Vaginal vs. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Vaginal Hysterectomy Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: A Randomized Controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
100
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Hysterectomy for benign indication is one of the most common surgical procedures in women. Numerous reviews and guidelines recommend the vaginal approach for benign hysterectomy, but the proportion of laparoscopic (and robotic) hysterectomies is increasing. This study will compare a range of clinical and subjective outcomes of vaginal vs. total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Outcomes include operating time, postoperative recovery, return to work as well as cosmesis, quality of life and sexual health.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2017
CompletedApril 17, 2018
April 1, 2018
2.6 years
February 10, 2014
April 16, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Operating time (min.)
Operating time (min.)
Surgery
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Complications
6 weeks
Anesthesia time (min.)
surgery
Quality of life
12 months
Sexual health
12 months
Return to work
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Vaginal hysterectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORVaginal hysterectomy
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaparoscopic hysterectomy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- benign indication for vaginal hysterectomy (e.g., abnormal uterine bleeding, fibroids, atypical endometrial hyperplasia)
- clinical exam indicates vaginal hysterectomy is feasible
- no major concomitant surgery
- able to complete questionnaires in German
You may not qualify if:
- uterine malignancy
- major concomitant surgery (e.g., for incontinence or prolapse)
- clinical exam indicating vaginal hysterectomy not feasible
- contraindication for surgery or laparoscopy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Abteilung Gynäkologie
Graz, 8020, Austria
Medical University of Graz/Dept. OB/GYN
Graz, 8036, Austria
LKH Leoben/Abteilung Gynäkologie
Leoben, 8700, Austria
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Karl F Tamussino, MD
Medical University of Graz
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rene W Laky, MD
Medical University of Graz
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2014
First Posted
February 11, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
August 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 17, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04