Efficacy of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Dysfunction in Working Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
An Interventional, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Active-referenced (Paroxetine), Fixed-dose Study on the Efficacy of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Dysfunction in Working Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
2 other identifiers
interventional
152
4 countries
18
Brief Summary
To assess the efficacy of acute treatment with 10 mg/day vortioxetine versus placebo on cognitive performance (focusing on the aspect concerning speed of processing, executive functioning, attention) in working patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 major-depressive-disorder
Started Oct 2014
18 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 31, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2016
CompletedFebruary 28, 2017
February 1, 2017
1.3 years
October 21, 2014
February 27, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST): number of correct symbols
Baseline to Week 8
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Change in Trail Making Test (TMT) score: TMT-A; speed of processing
Baseline to Week 8
Change in TMT-B; executive functioning
Baseline to Week 8
Change in reaction time score: Choice Reaction Time (CRT); attention
Baseline to Week 8
Change in reaction time score: Simple Reaction Time (SRT); psychomotor speed)
Baseline to Week 8
Change in Stroop Colour Naming Test (STROOP): incongruent score; executive functioning
Baseline to Week 8
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Vortioxetine 10 mg
EXPERIMENTALdaily, encapsulated, orally
Paroxetine 20 mg (active reference)
OTHERdaily, encapsulated, orally
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORcapsules, orally
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient has MDD, diagnosed according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR™) recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD) (classification 296.3x).
- The patient has a MADRS total score ≥26.
- The patient has had the current major depressive episode (MDE) for ≥3 months.
- The patient is aged ≥18 and ≤65 years.
- The patient is employed full or part-time (defined as minimum 50% full time working hours per week). Part time work should not be due to a medical or mental illness other than MDD.
- The patient has been in the current job/position for at least 3 months.
- The patient has no plans to change jobs or retire within treatment period.
- The patient is not on a sick leave, and at the Screening and Randomisation Visits, there are no plans to send the patient on a sick leave.
- The patient is not receiving disability benefits.
You may not qualify if:
- The patient has a score ≥70 on the DSST (number of correct symbols) at the Baseline Visit.
- The patient is, in the opinion of the investigator, not able to complete the neuropsychological tests validly at the Baseline Visit.
- The patient has physical, cognitive, or language impairment of such severity as to adversely affect the validity of the data derived from the neuropsychological tests.
- The patient is diagnosed with reading disability (dyslexia).
- The patient has a history of lack of response to previous adequate treatment with vortioxetine or paroxetine.
- The patient has any current psychiatric disorder or Axis I disorder (according to DSM-IV-TR™ criteria) other than MDD, as assessed using MINI.
- The patient has a current or has had a diagnosis of dysthymic disorder within 3 months preceding the onset of current episode (DSM-IV-TR™ criteria).
- The patient has borderline, schizotypal, schizoid, paranoid, or histrionic, antisocial personality disorders (axis II) as comorbid or primary diagnosis (DSM-IV-TR™ criteria).
- The patient suffers from personality disorders, mental retardation, pervasive development disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, organic mental disorders, or mental disorders due to a general medical condition (DSM-IV-TR™ criteria).
- The patient has a current diagnosis or history of manic or hypomanic episode, schizophrenia or any other psychotic disorder, including major depression with psychotic features (DSM-IV-TR™ criteria).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- H. Lundbeck A/Slead
Study Sites (18)
EE001
Tallinn, Estonia
EE002
Tallinn, Estonia
EE004
Võru, Estonia
FI002
Helsinki, Finland
FI003
Helsinki, Finland
FI001
Kuopio, Finland
FI008
Oulu, Finland
FI007
Tampere, Finland
DE002
Berlin, Germany
DE001
Bielefeld, Germany
DE003
Frankfurt, Germany
DE007
Frankfurt, Germany
DE008
Schwerin, Germany
LT002
Kaunas, Lithuania
LT006
Palanga, Lithuania
LT003
Šilutė, Lithuania
LT001
Vilnius, Lithuania
LT005
Vilnius, Lithuania
Related Publications (1)
Christensen MC, Sluth LB, McIntyre RS. Validation of the University of California San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA) in major depressive disorder: Replication and extension of initial findings. J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 15;245:508-516. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.034. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
PMID: 30439678DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Email contact via H. Lundbeck A/S
LundbeckClinicalTrials@lundbeck.com
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2014
First Posted
October 31, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 28, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02