Efficacy Study of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Dysfunction in Adult Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
FOCUS
Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Fixed Dose Study on the Efficacy of [Vortioxetine] Lu AA21004 on Cognitive Dysfunction in Adult Patients With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
2 other identifiers
interventional
598
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a severe and common psychiatric disorder. Although MDD primarily involves mood disturbances, patients also usually present alterations in cognitive function (attention, memory, executive functioning and psychomotor speed). Even though antidepressants are suggested in the literature to potentially improve cognitive dysfunction in patients with MDD to some degree, there is a lack of adequate and well-controlled studies to investigate this effect. This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a new antidepressant Vortioxetine versus placebo on cognitive dysfunction in adult patients with MDD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 major-depressive-disorder
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 23, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 5, 2014
CompletedAugust 5, 2014
July 1, 2014
1.4 years
August 22, 2011
May 14, 2014
July 8, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in DSST (Number of Correct Symbols) and RAVLT (Acquisition and Delayed Recall) Using the Composite Z-score Defined as the Weighted Sum of the Individual Patient Z-scores
DSST assesses psychomotor speed of performance requiring visual perception, spatial decision-making, and motor skills. It consists of 133 digits and requires the patient to substitute each digit with a simple symbol in a 90-s period. Each correct symbol is counted, and the total score ranges from 0 (\< normal functioning) to 133 (\> normal functioning). RAVLT assesses verbal learning and memory, including immediate memory, efficiency of learning, retroactive and proactive interference effects, and encoding versus retrieval. It consists of a number of tasks, including immediate recall and delayed recall. The number of words correctly recalled on each task is recorded. The scores are standardized by subtracting the overall mean change from baseline from the individual change from baseline and dividing by the standard deviation estimate of the change from baseline. The 2 tests, DSST and RAVLT are each assigned a weight of 0.5, the 2 subtests of RAVLT are each assigned a weight of 0.25.
Baseline and Week 8
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in DSST (Number of Correct Symbols)
Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in RAVLT (Acquisition)
Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in RAVLT (Delayed Recall)
Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the TMT A (Speed of Processing)
Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the TMT B (Executive Function)
Baseline and Week 8
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORVortioxetine 10 mg
EXPERIMENTALVortioxetine 20 mg
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
encapsulated tablets; daily; orally
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient is an inpatient in a psychiatric hospital or an outpatient at a psychiatric setting at the time of the study entry.
- The patient is diagnosed with recurrent MDD according to DSM-IV-TR™ criteria (classification code 296.3x). The current Major Depressive Episode (MDE) should be confirmed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI).
- The patient has received prescribed treatment for a previous episode of depression.
- The patient has a MADRS total score ≥26.
- The reported duration of the current MDE is at least 3 months.
You may not qualify if:
- The patient has a score ≥70 on the DSST (number of correct symbols), or ≥42 on the RAVLT (learning) or ≥14 on the RAVLT (memory) at the Baseline Visit.
- The patient has any current Axis I disorder (DSM-IV-TR™ criteria) other than MDD, confirmed using the MINI.
- The patient has a current diagnosis or history of manic or hypomanic episode, schizophrenia or any other psychotic disorder, including major depression with psychotic features.
- The patient suffers from personality disorders, mental retardation, pervasive development disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, organic mental disorders, or mental disorders due to a general medical condition (DSM-IV-TR™ criteria).
- The patient has physical, cognitive, or language impairment of such severity as to adversely affect the validity of the data derived from the neuropsychological tests.
- The patient is diagnosed with reading disability (dyslexia).
- The patient is at significant risk of suicide or has a score ≥5 on Item 10 (suicidal thoughts) of the MADRS, or has attempted suicide \<6 months prior to the Screening Visit.
- The patient has received electroconvulsive therapy \<6 months prior to the Screening Visit.
- The current depressive symptoms are considered by the investigator to have been resistant to 2 adequate antidepressant treatments of at least 6 weeks duration each at the recommended dose.
- The patient has a history of moderate or severe head trauma (for example, loss of consciousness for more than 1 hour) or other neurological disorders or systemic medical diseases that are, in the opinion of the investigator, likely to affect central nervous system functioning.
- The patient has a history of cancer, other than basal cell or Stage 1 squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, that has not been in remission for \>5 years prior to the first drug dose.
- The patient has a clinically significant unstable illness, for example:
- cardiovascular disease
- seizure disorder or encephalopathy
- congestive heart failure
- +16 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- H. Lundbeck A/Slead
Related Publications (3)
Nohr AK, Lindow M, Forsingdal A, Demharter S, Nielsen T, Buller R, Moltke I, Vitezic M, Albrechtsen A. A large-scale genome-wide gene expression analysis in peripheral blood identifies very few differentially expressed genes related to antidepressant treatment and response in patients with major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Jun;46(7):1324-1332. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01002-9. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
PMID: 33833401DERIVEDMcIntyre RS, Florea I, Tonnoir B, Loft H, Lam RW, Christensen MC. Efficacy of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Functioning in Working Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;78(1):115-121. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16m10744.
PMID: 27780334DERIVEDMcIntyre RS, Lophaven S, Olsen CK. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of vortioxetine on cognitive function in depressed adults. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Oct;17(10):1557-67. doi: 10.1017/S1461145714000546. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
PMID: 24787143DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- H. Lundbeck A/S
- Organization
- H. Lundbeck A/S
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Email contact via H. Lundbeck A/S
LundbeckClinicalTrials@lundbeck.com
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2011
First Posted
August 23, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
August 5, 2014
Results First Posted
August 5, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-07