The Use of EEG in Alzheimer's Disease, With and Without Scopolamine - A Pilot Study
Development of a Diagnostic Tool for Alzheimer's Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
29
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the electroencephalography (EEG) responses of three distinct groups of individuals to scopolamine: 1) a group of Alzheimer Dementia (AD) patients, 2) a group of individuals suffering from Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and 3) a group of controls. The main purpose of this comparison is to discover ways to use these responses to distinguish between the group of AD patients and controls in order to develop a diagnostic tool for AD. The purpose of including the MCI group is to investigate whether this diagnostic tool can predict which member of the MCI group will develop AD later in life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2004
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2004
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 24, 2014
CompletedOctober 24, 2014
October 1, 2014
6 months
September 29, 2014
October 22, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in EEG as a result of scopolamine administration
The EEG is recorded before, during and after scopolamine administration in order to monitor the effects scopolamine has on the brain as measured by EEG.
1 hr after scopolamine administration
Study Arms (3)
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORScopolamine
MCI
ACTIVE COMPARATORScopolamine
AD
ACTIVE COMPARATORScopolamine
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy subjects:
- Between 60-80 years of age.
- Volunteers will have to be in good general health as determined by standard physical examination.
- Normal Electrocardiograph (ECG)
- MCI subjects:
- Diagnosed with MCI at the Memory Clinic at the Landspitali University Hospital using F 06,7 according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD) - 10.
- Between 60-80 years of age.
- Subjects need to score between 2 and 3 on the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS).
- Normal ECG
- Alzheimer's patients:
- Diagnosed with AD according to ICD - 10 in Follow up at the Memory Clinic at the Landspitali University Hospital.
- Between 60-80 years of age.
- Subjects need to score between 3-5 on the GDS.
- Normal ECG
- Treated with Reminyl® for the Alzheimer disease.
You may not qualify if:
- Smoking or any other use of tobacco.
- Taking neuroleptics or benzodiazepines (allowed to take oxazepam ad vesp).
- Neurological-, cardiovascular-, gastrointestinal- or genitourinary disorders of medical importance.
- Glaucoma or history of possibly raised intraocular pressure.
- Impaired liver- or kidney function.
- Hypersensitivity to Scopolamine or any component in the formulation.
- Any indication of drug, alcohol or medicine abuse.
- Participation in another investigational study at the same time.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mentis Curalead
- Landspitali University Hospitalcollaborator
Related Publications (2)
Gudmundsson S, Runarsson TP, Sigurdsson S, Eiriksdottir G, Johnsen K. Reliability of quantitative EEG features. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;118(10):2162-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.06.018. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
PMID: 17765604BACKGROUNDSnaedal J, Johannesson GH, Gudmundsson TE, Gudmundsson S, Pajdak TH, Johnsen K. The use of EEG in Alzheimer's disease, with and without scopolamine - a pilot study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Jun;121(6):836-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.01.008. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
PMID: 20153691RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jón Snædal, MD
Landspitali University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2014
First Posted
October 24, 2014
Study Start
April 1, 2004
Primary Completion
October 1, 2004
Study Completion
January 1, 2010
Last Updated
October 24, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-10