Comparison of Aprepitant Versus Aprepitant and Transdermal Scopolamine for Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
A Randomized, Double-blind Comparison of Oral Aprepitant Alone vs Oral Aprepitant and Transdermal Scopolamine for Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
1 other identifier
interventional
115
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of nausea, vomiting, need for rescue medication, prolonged PACU time, and unplanned hospital admission in patients with high risk for post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) treated with oral aprepitant with or without transdermal scopolamine preoperatively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2008
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 15, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 16, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 29, 2014
CompletedMay 20, 2014
September 1, 2013
2.1 years
July 15, 2008
March 5, 2014
May 1, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Nausea and Vomiting
24 hours postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of Participants With Nausea and Vomiting in PACU
Postoperatively, up to 2 hours
Total Vomiting
24 hours postoperatively
Need for Antiemetic Medication
24 hours postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Aprepitant and Scopolamine group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive aprepitant and scopolamine for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting then were followed through the post operative period looking for nausea, vomiting, composite, and rescue medication utilization. This was compared to patients receiving aprepitant and scopolamine placebo looking for a difference in incidence of events.
Aprepitant and Scopolamine Placebo Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients receiving aprepitant and placebo scopolamine for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting then followed through the post operative period looking for signs of nausea, vomiting, composite, and rescue medication utilization. This was compared to patients receiving aprepitant and scopolamine looking for a difference in incidence of events.
Interventions
Aprepitant 40mg PO one time at least one hour prior to induction of anesthesia
Scopolamine transdermal applied to skin behind the ear one hour prior to surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Between 18 and 65 years of age
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status 1-3
- If on oral contraceptive, must be willing to use back up method for 1 month
- Must have 2 risk factors for PONV
You may not qualify if:
- History of vomiting due to middle ear infection, nervous system disorder, or other condition
- Procedure less than 1 hour
- Pregnant or breast feeding
- Antiemetic medication in previous 24 hours
- Narrow-angle glaucoma
- Allergic to belladonna alkaloids
- Hypersensitive to barbiturates
- Prostate hypertrophy
- Severe hepatic disease
- On chemotherapy taking aprepitant
- Fever
- Sepsis
- Taking any of the following medications: Orap, Seldane, Hismanal, Propulsid, Phenytoin, Phenothiazines, Tricyclic antidepressants, Meperidine, Tolbutamide, Aluminum and Magnesium containing Antacids, Anti-cholinergics, Coumadin
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Drexel Universitylead
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hahnemann University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michael Green, DO
- Organization
- Drexel University College of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael S Green, DO
Drexel University College of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2008
First Posted
July 16, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion
March 1, 2010
Study Completion
March 1, 2010
Last Updated
May 20, 2014
Results First Posted
April 29, 2014
Record last verified: 2013-09