NCT01312844

Brief Summary

The primary purpose of this study is to assess the ability of scopolamine to improve the antidepressant effects of ECT and to determine whether scopolamine will shorten the time to response and remission for patients receiving ECT. The hypothesis are:

  1. 1.Patients receiving ECT plus scopolamine will have greater improvement in depression symptoms than those receiving ECT plus placebo.
  2. 2.Patients receiving scopolamine in addition to ECT will require fewer ECT treatments to obtain response/remission compared to the group receiving ECT plus placebo.
  3. 3.Time to response and to remission in the scopolamine group will be significantly shorter compared to ECT alone.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
7

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2 depression

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2010

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 4, 2010

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 11, 2011

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2012

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 18, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

May 30, 2017

Status Verified

April 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

May 4, 2010

Results QC Date

February 8, 2017

Last Update Submit

April 27, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in Ham D 17 Scores

    Change in Ham D 17 scores measured by the difference between baseline HAM D score and HAM D score at last ECT administration. The HAM D 17 measures severity of depression with 52 being most severe and 0 being no depression. A negative change score refers to a decrease in HAM D score, while a positive change score would refer to an increase in HAM D score.

    At the time of ECT completion (about 2 weeks)

  • Time to Response for Patients Receiving ECT

    The number of days between baseline HAM D score and HAM D score showing response (defined as a HAM D score less than half of baseline). If patients HAM D score rose above this marker at any point in the study, they were not considered as responding.The HAM D 17 measures severity of depression with 52 being most severe and 0 being no depression. .

    Duration of ECT treatment (usually 2 weeks)

  • Number of ECT Treatments Received to Achieve Response/Remission

    The number of ECT treatments needed to achieve response (defined as a HAM D score less than half of baseline) and remission (defined as a HAM D score of less than 8). If patients HAM D score rose above these markers at any point in the study, they were not considered as responding or remitting.The HAM D 17 measures severity of depression with 52 being most severe and 0 being no depression.

    Duration of ECTtreatment (usually 2 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Number of ECT Treatments Withheld Due to Cognitive Impairment

    Duration of ECT treatment (usually 2 weeks)

  • The Mean Number of Moderate to Severe Side Effects

    Duration of ECT treatment (usually 2 weeks)

  • The Mean Levels of Physiological Measures of ECT (Blood Pressure)

    Duration of ECT treatment (usually 2 weeks)

  • The Mean Levels of Physiological Measures of ECT (Heart Rate)

    Duration of ECT treatment (usually 2 weeks)

  • The Mean Levels of Physiological Measures of ECT (Seizure Duration)

    Duration of ECT treatment (usually 2 weeks)

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Scopolamine

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients receiving IV scopolamine at ECT treatment

Drug: Scopolamine

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Patients receiving IV placebo at ECT treatment

Drug: Scopolamine

Interventions

Those receiving active drug will receive scopolamine 4mcg/kg IV with each treatment, until completion of ECT

PlaceboScopolamine

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Males and females between the ages of 18-50 (inclusive)
  • DSM-IV diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), without psychotic features, and a HAM-D-17 score of 18 or higher
  • Female subjects must be postmenopausal, surgically sterile, or, if of child-bearing age, using double-barrier contraceptive method or prescription oral contraceptives (e.g. estrogen-progestin combinations), contraceptive implants (e.g. NorplantTM, DepoProveraTM, or transdermally delivered contraceptives (Ortho EvraTM) before entry and throughout the study; and have a negative urine b-HCG pregnancy test at screening.

You may not qualify if:

  • Substance use disorder active use within the last 6 months (per assessment using SCID)
  • Organic mental disorders
  • Seizure disorders
  • Unstable physical disorder or physical disorder judged to significantly affect the central nervous system function
  • Heart block
  • Pre-existing sick-sinus
  • Chronic treatment with beta blockers
  • Any cardiac arrhythmia
  • Hypotension
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Liver and renal function impairment
  • Urge incontinence or prostatic hypertrophy
  • Colitis
  • Crohn's disease
  • GI motility disorders
  • +9 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02144, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depression

Interventions

Scopolamine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Scopolamine DerivativesTropanesAzabicyclo CompoundsAza CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsBelladonna AlkaloidsSolanaceous AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-Ring

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. John Matthews
Organization
Massachusetts General Hospital

Study Officials

  • John D Matthews, MD

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • David Abramson, MD

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Maurizio Fava, MD

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2010

First Posted

March 11, 2011

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion

July 1, 2012

Study Completion

July 1, 2012

Last Updated

May 30, 2017

Results First Posted

April 18, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations