Patient-Reported Preferences Affecting Revascularization Decisions
PREPARED
1 other identifier
interventional
203
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Selection of a treatment strategy for patients with symptoms due to coronary artery disease requires consideration of patient preferences. In current clinical practice, patient preferences for treatment may not be known prior to diagnostic coronary angiography. The investigators will test an internet-based shared decision-making tool which will provide education and solicit preference information prior to angiography. The investigators seek to determine if this tool can accurately assess patient preferences, and if these preferences will lead to a change in clinical management.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Nov 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 20, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedAugust 3, 2016
August 1, 2016
1.6 years
October 20, 2014
August 2, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Concordance of patient preference with delivered treatment
Among patients with significant coronary artery disease on diagnostic angiography, the percentage of subjects with delivered therapy (medical management, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft) identical to preferences expressed prior to angiography.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Knowledge
Within 2 hours of angiography
Knowledge
3 months
Decisional conflict
Within 2 hours of angiography
Patient satisfaction
Within 2 hours of angiography
Patient satisfaction
3 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Preferences Not Provided
NO INTERVENTIONSubjects will complete a shared decision-making tool and express preferences regarding treatment for coronary artery disease, but these preferences will NOT be shared with the treating clinicians.
Preferences Provided
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will complete a shared decision-making tool and express preferences regarding treatment for coronary artery disease, and these preferences WILL be shared with the treating clinicians.
Interventions
A brief internet-based tool will provide education about coronary artery disease and assess patient preferences regarding treatment options (medical management, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass graft). This information will be provided to the treating interventional cardiologist at the time of coronary angiography in the treatment group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients referred to the catheterization laboratory for diagnostic coronary angiography with a reasonable expectation of coronary artery disease, defined as chronic stable angina, chest pain with a positive functional study, unstable angina, or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to provide informed consent
- Unable to speak or read English
- Critical illness
- When a delay in angiography to administer the decision aid could lead to adverse clinical outcome
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
- Gilead Sciencescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Duke University Hospital
Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States
Related Publications (1)
Doll JA, Jones WS, Lokhnygina Y, Culpepper S, Parks RL, Calhoun C, Au DH, Patel MR. PREPARED Study: A Study of Shared Decision-Making for Coronary Artery Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Feb;12(2):e005244. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005244.
PMID: 30764651DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Manesh Patel
Duke University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 20, 2014
First Posted
October 22, 2014
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 3, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08