NCT02138305

Brief Summary

Visual assessment of a coronary artery narrowing (called stenosis) seen on angiography is conventionally used to infer how likely the stenosis will limit blood flow (called ischemia) under conditions of increased demand (e.g exercise). This is based on animal work and data from humans with simple single vessel disease with no co-existing conditions. These data have been extrapolated to more complex patients/ complex disease but clearly over-simplifies the situation in the majority of patients cardiologists treat. Pivotal work by DeBruyne, Pils and colleagues in the 90's convincingly showed that pressure derived measurements, called FFR, from the coronary artery during a cardiac catheterization, more accurately identify stenoses that would cause ischemia compared to visual assessment alone. A strategy of FFR guided coronary stenting with drug eluting stents significantly improved outcomes and reduced costs compared to visual assessment alone (FAME trial). Deferring treatment based on FFR has been shown to be safe (DEFER Trial). FFR has excellent sensitivity and specificity. A FFR of \<=0.80 was used as this identified ischemia causing lesions 90% of the time. Therefore, the concept of FFR guided percutaneous revascularisation and treatment deferral has a robust evidence base to support it. Coronary bypass grafting (CABG) is traditionally based solely on a visual assessment of angiography images. SPY® Infrared Fluorescence Angiography (NIRF, FDA approved 2005) is used by some cardiac surgeons to assess the patency of bypass grafts in real-time in the operating room, as a surrogate for immediate traditional coronary angiography. Dr. Ferguson observed that regional myocardial perfusion (RMP) image data was also captured in these video sequences. Study Hypotheses:

  1. 1.In patients who are likely CABG candidates, target vessel epicardial coronary arteries (TVECAs) with FFR \> 0.80 will not demonstrate an increase in RMP despite an anatomically patent bypass conduit during SPY® imaging.
  2. 2.In TVECAs with an increase in RMP during SPY® imaging, cardiac catheter laboratory measures of coronary physiology from that TVECA, namely one or a combination of FFR, CFR, HSR and HMR, will correlate with the SPY® data on myocardial perfusion, and suggest a potential mechanism for this physiologic response to TVECA grafting.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 12, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 14, 2014

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2014

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 30, 2018

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 30, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

August 28, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

May 12, 2014

Last Update Submit

August 23, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)Instantaneous Wave Free Ratio (iFR)Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR)Hyperemic Stenosis Resistance Index (HSR)Hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR)Wave intensity analysis (WIA)Myocardial PerfusionSPY NIRF Regional Myocardial Perfusion Analysis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Correlation Analysis

    Correlation between anatomy, functional anatomy, FFR, SPY® RMP change, and the presence or absence of imaged competitive flow

    18 months

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Correlation Analysis

    18 months

  • Instantaneous Wave Free Ratio (iFR)

    18 months

  • Wave Intensity Analysis (WIA)

    18 months

Study Arms (1)

Patients referred for CABG

OTHER

* Patients who after undergoing standard of care diagnostic coronary angiography will be referred for CABG * ComboMap XT Guidewire * 'SPY' NIRF During CABG

Device: ComboMap XT GuidewireProcedure: 'SPY' NIRF During CABG

Interventions

Intracoronary pressure and flow measurements

Patients referred for CABG

FDA approved use of injection of indocyanine green for the purposes of performing pre and post coronary grafting graft patency and perfusion assessment with the SPY near infra red fluorescence system

Patients referred for CABG

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age \>18\<80
  • Patients with stable angina or NSTEMI with total CK rise of \<1000 U/litre who after planned coronary angiography are going to be referred for CABG and have at least one vessel with a visual 40-80% stenosis that is interrogated with intracoronary physiology

You may not qualify if:

  • Emergent status, or Cardiogenic shock
  • LVEF \<40%
  • History of actively malignant disease
  • Patient needing concomitant valvular surgery or other cardiac structural reconstructive surgery
  • As is standard of care, those vessels that are extremely tortuous, very small caliber and/or heavily calcified would not have such wires passed down them. Furthermore, those vessels that are 80-90+% stenosed, with \<TIMI 3 flow, which we would not normally pass a diagnostic physiology pressure wire, would not be studied with ComboXT wire.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

East Carolina Heart Institute at Vidant Medical Center

Greenville, North Carolina, 27834, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Ashesh N Buch, MBChB, MD

    East Carolina University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • T. Bruce Ferguson, MD

    East Carolina University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Controlled prospective observational study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor Cardiovascular Sciences (Interventional Cardiology)

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2014

First Posted

May 14, 2014

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion

March 30, 2018

Study Completion

March 30, 2019

Last Updated

August 28, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-08

Locations