Eribulin Plus Gemcitabine (EG) vs Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (PG) in HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
EG_PG
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Eribulin Plus Gemcitabine (EG) vs.Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine (PG) in Patients With HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer as First -Line Chemotherapy
1 other identifier
interventional
118
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is an incurable disease and is needed to improve effective chemotherapy. Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine (PG) combination chemotherapy is one of the preferred chemotherapeutic regimens for patients with MBC, and was found to be proper as a maintenance chemotherapy regimen with survival benefit and feasible toxicity profile as shown in a large phase III KCSG (Korean Cancer Study Group) study (Park Y et al. J Clin Oncol 31(14):1732, 2013). Eribulin mesylate is a microtubule-targeting agent that showed improved overall survival benefit as monotherapy for MBC patients as a new chemotherapeutic agent after failure of anthracycline and taxane in EMBRACE study (Cortes J et. al. Lancet 377:914-923, 2011). Eribulin was also reported its promising efficacy in another randomized phase III study that demonstrated eribulin as efficacious as capecitabine (Kaufman P et. al. Abstr# S6-6, SABCS 2012). Both study results showed potential clinical benefit in patients with triple negative MBC (TNBC). Thus, eribulin combined with gemcitabine may be a new potential regimen for early line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Furthermore, eribulin may have rational benefit compared with paclitaxel in terms of neurotoxicity. Although there is no direct evidence that eribulin has better neurotoxicity profile than taxane, eribulin tended to show less neurotoxicity compared with ixabepilone in a phase II trial (Vahdat, L et al. 2011 SABCS). Eribulin has no worsen toxicity as compared to paclitaxel. Therefore, EG may have less neurotoxicity comparing to PG. In phase I trial, eribulin in combination with gemcitabine was feasible in patients with advanced solid tumor treated with chemotherapy (\< 3 lines) (Goel R, et al, 2009 ASCO). Based on this rationale, the investigators are to conduct randomized phase II study comparing EG chemotherapy with PG chemotherapy for patients with HER-2 negative MBC as first-line chemotherapy. A total of 118 patients will be recruited. Patients will be randomized to a treatment arm by permutated method. The randomization ratio is 1:1. This study is multi-center, randomized, open label study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Dec 2014
Typical duration for phase_2
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 6, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 13, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 19, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 11, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 17, 2019
CompletedJuly 14, 2020
July 1, 2020
2.4 years
October 6, 2014
July 12, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Progression free survival
To demonstrate that EG is not inferior to PG group in terms of PFS in patients with metastatic or recurrent breast cancer as first-line treatment.
48months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
overall survival
48months
neuropathic scale
expected at 9week , expected at 24week
toxicity of study drugs
from first administration until 28 days after the last dose administration
duration of response
48months
objective response rate
48months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Paclitaxel & Gemcitabine(PG)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPaclitaxel 175mg/m2 IV , Day1,every 3weeks Gemcitabine 1250mg/m2 IV ,Day1\& Day8 every 3weeks
Eribulin & Gemcitabine(EG)
EXPERIMENTALEribulin 1.0 mg/m2, 2-5min iv ,Day1\& Day8 every 3weeks Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 ,Day1\& Day8 every 3weeks
Interventions
175mg/m2 + D5W 500mL MIV over 3hrs before gemcitabine administration
1.0 mg/m2, 2-5min iv before gemcitabine (or miv with NS 100ml in max.)
PG:1250mg/m2 + NS 100ml MIV over 30mins EG:1000mg/m2 + NS 100ml MIV over 30mins
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologically confirmed metastatic, or recurrent breast cancer
- HER2-negative breast cancer
- age \> 18 years
- ECOG performance status 0 - 2
- Pre- or postmenopausal breast cancer patients with measurable or non-measurable lesions, who are candidates for chemotherapy
- Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
- No prior history of chemotherapy for metastatic, recurrent breast cancer
- Patients may have received prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant taxane regimen as long as it has been 12 months since completion of regimen.
- Patients either may or may not have a prior anthracycline containing regimen.
- Prior hormonal therapy as a treatment of metastatic disease is allowed. But antitumoral hormonal therapy must be terminated prior to enrollment(up to the date of randomization)
- Prior radiation therapy allowed as long as \< 25% of the bone marrow has been treated, and the patients must have recovered from the acute toxic effects of the treatment prior to study enrollment. Prior radiation to the whole pelvis is not allowed. Prior radiotherapy must be completed 2 weeks before study entry.
- Bisphosphonates for the treatment of bone metastases should not be initiated following the first dose of randomized therapy. It must be initiated prior to day of treatment (cycle 1, day 1). Patients may continue on bisphosphonates who already established on bisphosphonate therapy for bone metastases
- Adequate bone marrow function (≥ ANC 1,500/ul, ≥ platelet 100,000/ul, ≥ Hemoglobin 9.0 g/dl)
- Adequate renal function (≤ serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dl or CCr ≥ 50 ml/min)
- Adequate liver function (≤ serum bilirubin 1.5 mg/dl, ≤ AST \& ALTX3 upper normal limit or AST and ALT ≤ 5.0XULN if judged by the investigator to be related to liver metastases)
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Serious uncontrolled intercurrent infections
- Serious intercurrent medical or psychiatric illness, including active cardiac disease
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
- Second primary malignancy(except in situ carcinoma of the cervix or adequately treated nonmelanomatous carcinoma of the skin or other malignancy treated at least 5 years previously with no evidence of recurrence)
- Documented parenchymal or leptomeningeal brain metastasis
- Peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 2
- Prior treatment with gemcitabine will not be allowed.
- HER-2 overexpressing breast cancer and concomitant trastuzumab treatment is not allowed
- Women of childbearing potential, unwilling to use a medically acceptable method of contraception during the trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Asan Medical Centerlead
- Eisai Inc.collaborator
- Dong-A ST Co., Ltd.collaborator
- Samyang Biopharmaceuticals Corporationcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 135-710, South Korea
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 138-736, South Korea
Related Publications (2)
Kim JY, Lee E, Park K, Im SA, Sohn J, Lee KS, Chae YS, Kim JH, Kim TY, Jung KH, Park YH; Breast Cancer Committee of the Korean Cancer Study Group. Exploratory biomarker analysis from a phase II clinical trial of eribulin plus gemcitabine versus paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients (KCSG BR13-11). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Nov;178(2):367-377. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05400-y. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
PMID: 31407230DERIVEDPark YH, Im SA, Kim SB, Sohn JH, Lee KS, Chae YS, Lee KH, Kim JH, Im YH, Kim JY, Kim TY, Lee KH, Ahn JH, Kim GM, Park IH, Lee SJ, Han HS, Kim SH, Jung KH; Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG). Phase II, multicentre, randomised trial of eribulin plus gemcitabine versus paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:385-393. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
PMID: 29100193DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kyung Hae Jung, Dr
Asan Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 6, 2014
First Posted
October 13, 2014
Study Start
December 19, 2014
Primary Completion
May 11, 2017
Study Completion
June 17, 2019
Last Updated
July 14, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07