Memantine for Neuroprotection and Cognitive Enhancement Following Traumatic Brain Injury
1 other identifier
interventional
11
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if memantine can improve cognitive and neuropsychiatric outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 30, 2017
CompletedAugust 30, 2017
August 1, 2017
1.3 years
September 11, 2014
May 4, 2017
August 28, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
California Verbal Learning Test - Second Edition (CVLT-II) - Long Delay Free Recall
Neuropsychological test used to assess an individual's verbal memory abilities. The California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) Long Delay Free Recall measures total word list items recalled after a 20-minute delay. The raw score is converted to a Z-score (Mean=0; SD=1) which was used for statistical analysis. Higher scores reflect worse performance (i.e., more recall errors) on this variable.
Week 24
Secondary Outcomes (7)
CVLT-II Trials 1-5 Free Recall Total
Week 24
Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) Delayed Recall
Week 24
BVMT-R Learning
Week 24
Trail Making Part B
Week 24
Stroop Interference
Week 24
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Memantine
EXPERIMENTAL24 weeks of memantine with accelerated titration, beginning within 48 hours of injury.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOR24 weeks of placebo matched to memantine formulation, beginning within 48 hours of injury.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old of age at time of enrollment
- Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI)
- Feeding access (e.g., orogastric (OG), nasogastric (NG), or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube) permitting delivery of memantine or placebo
- Availability of legally-authorized representative (LAR) to provide consent and participate in some study activities (e.g., monitoring for side effects, providing information about the patient)
You may not qualify if:
- Pre-existing history of serious neurological disorder
- Pre-existing history of serious psychiatric disorder (e.g., schizophrenia)
- Anticipated poor prognosis, based on the presence of bilaterally fixed and dilated pupils, severe hemodynamic instability, severe elevations in intracranial pressure refractory to interventions, or other factors leading to a determination of a probable non-survivable injury
- Primarily penetrating mechanism of injury (e.g., gunshot wound to the head)
- Isolated epidural hematoma with anticipated good prognosis
- Low probability of participant being compliant or being able to finish study procedures (e.g., present for outcome rating) in the judgment of the investigator
- Not English speaking (due to inability to complete outcome measure)
- Medical contraindications to memantine: Severe hepatic impairment (defined as albumin \> 15gm/dL, Alk Phos \> 375 U/L, ALT \> 150 U/L, AST \> 120 U/L or bilirubin \> 3mg/dL). Moderate-to-Severe renal impairment (defined as creatinine clearance \< 60)
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Indiana University Health Facilities
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Small sample size.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Flora Hammond, MD
- Organization
- Indiana University School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Flora Hammond, MD
Indiana University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Covalt Professor & Chair
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2014
First Posted
September 15, 2014
Study Start
December 1, 2014
Primary Completion
April 1, 2016
Study Completion
April 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 30, 2017
Results First Posted
August 30, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share