Satisfactory Analgesia Minimal Emesis in Day Surgeries
SAME-Day
Most Effective Opioid Analgesia in Ambulatory Surgeries: a Randomized Control, Investigator Blinded, Parallel Group With Superiority Design Study of Morphine Versus Hydromorphone
2 other identifiers
interventional
402
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Currently nearly 70% or more surgeries are being done as ambulatory (day care) procedures as they offer significant benefit to the patients as well as to the hospitals. Inadequate pain relief (30%-40%) and nausea-vomiting form the leading factors affecting the quality of care and hence its efficiency. Opioids form the primary modality to treat moderate to severe pain, but can also cause significant nausea-vomiting and other side effects. Although hydromorphone is five times more potent than morphine, in equianalgesic doses they both could provide similar pain relief. They both exert no ceiling effect for their analgesia, and hence incomplete or inadequate analgesia is related to the appearance of side effects. In this study the investigators shall assess the proportion of patients who satisfy the outcome of 'satisfactory analgesia with minimal nausea-vomiting' in ambulatory surgeries, assessed at 2 hours after surgery. Patients would be randomized to receive either morphine or hydromorphone in the surgical recovery area. All personnel involved with the study would be blinded. The investigators will also look to assess the time to discharge and other side effects. This will help to choose the better drug, thereby improving pain relief and side effects, and also the efficiency of health care delivery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable pain
Started Jan 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable pain
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 11, 2023
CompletedDecember 11, 2023
March 1, 2023
4.2 years
August 19, 2014
April 14, 2020
March 14, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Our Combined Primary Outcome Will be Number of Patients With Same Analgesia Minimal Emesis, as Compared Between the 2 Groups.
Our combined primary outcome will be number of patients with SAME, as compared between the 2 groups. Analgesia will be based on Numerical Analogue Scale for Pain 0-10 (appendix 3), and Post-operative nausea and vomiting will be based on Verbal Descriptive Scale 0-5 (appendix 3). These observations will be made at the end of 2 hrs or before (corresponding to the time of discharge from PACU), by the PACU nurse.
At 2hrs or at the time of discharge from PACU
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Number of Patients With Severe Itching
At 2hrs or at the time of discharge from PACU
Severe Sedation
At 2hrs or at the time of discharge from PACU
Severe Respiratory Depression
At 2hrs or at the time of discharge from PACU
Patients Requesting Oral Analgesia in the Day Surgery Unit
At 2hrs or at the time of discharge from PACU
Mean Dose of Analgesic Used
5 hours post-admit to hospital
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Morphine
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnalgesia with equipotent doses of Morphine and Hydromorphone will be administered in titrated doses. Doses are 1ml=1mg of morphine or 0.2 mg of hydromorphone. Potency ratio of 1:5 (M: HM). 0.05mg/kg morphine units (rounding off to the nearest 1 ml or 0.5 ml)
Hydromorphone
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnalgesia with equipotent doses of Morphine and Hydromorphone will be administered in titrated doses. Doses are 1ml=1mg of morphine or 0.2 mg of hydromorphone. Potency ratio of 1:5 (M: HM). 0.05mg/kg morphine units (rounding off to the nearest 1 ml or 0.5 ml)
Interventions
1st dose: syringe of 0.04mg/kg morphine units (rounding off to the nearest 1 ml or 0.5 ml); with a maximum of 3 mg of morphine equivalents is administered. Repeat doses: 0.02 mg/kg morphine units every 5-10 minutes to titrate for analgesia and side effects (rounding off to the nearest 1 ml or 0.5 ml)
1st dose: syringe of 0.04mg/kg morphine units (rounding off to the nearest 1 ml or 0.5 ml); with a maximum of 3 mg of morphine equivalents is administered. Repeat doses: 0.02 mg/kg morphine units every 5-10 minutes to titrate for analgesia and side effects (rounding off to the nearest 1 ml or 0.5 ml)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ambulatory surgeries producing at least moderate pain-such as cholecystectomy, appendicectomy, ovarian cystectomy, inguinal hernia repair, abdominal wall hernias
- ability to communicate in English.
You may not qualify if:
- allergy to M or HM
- patient on regular chronic opioid medication
- patient uncontrolled systemic disease
- severe obesity with a BMI \>35
- significant psychological impairment
- history of drug addiction or dependence
- any planned regional or nerve block other than local anesthesia infiltration patients with confirmed sleep apnea
- emergency surgeries and urological surgeries
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 2X2, Canada
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada
Related Publications (10)
Sarin P, Philip BK, Mitani A, Eappen S, Urman RD. Specialized ambulatory anesthesia teams contribute to decreased ambulatory surgery recovery room length of stay. Ochsner J. 2012 Summer;12(2):94-100.
PMID: 22778673BACKGROUNDTroy AM, Cunningham AJ. Ambulatory surgery: an overview. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2002 Dec;15(6):647-57. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200212000-00008.
PMID: 17019266BACKGROUNDShnaider I, Chung F. Outcomes in day surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Dec;19(6):622-9. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328010107e.
PMID: 17093366BACKGROUNDMacario A, Weinger M, Carney S, Kim A. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. Anesth Analg. 1999 Sep;89(3):652-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199909000-00022.
PMID: 10475299BACKGROUNDChatterjee S, Rudra A, Sengupta S. Current concepts in the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:748031. doi: 10.1155/2011/748031. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
PMID: 22110499BACKGROUNDWhite PF. Pain management after ambulatory surgery - where is the disconnect? Can J Anaesth. 2008 Apr;55(4):201-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03021503. No abstract available. English, French.
PMID: 18378964BACKGROUNDFelden L, Walter C, Harder S, Treede RD, Kayser H, Drover D, Geisslinger G, Lotsch J. Comparative clinical effects of hydromorphone and morphine: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;107(3):319-28. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer232. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
PMID: 21841049BACKGROUNDShanthanna H, Khaled MATM, Diaz A, Farsinejad P, Clements S. Low-dose remifentanil as an adjunct analgesic is not associated with clinically important opioid-induced hyperalgesia: secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Apr 24:rapm-2025-106483. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2025-106483. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 40274406DERIVEDShanthanna H, Paul J, Lovrics P, Vanniyasingam T, Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Thabane L. Satisfactory analgesia with minimal emesis in day surgeries: a randomised controlled trial of morphine versus hydromorphone. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jun;122(6):e107-e113. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.036. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
PMID: 31027915DERIVEDShanthanna H, Paul J, Lovrics P, Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Thabane L. Satisfactory Analgesia with Minimal Emesis in Day Surgeries (SAME DayS): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial of morphine versus hydromorphone. BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 22;8(6):e022504. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022504.
PMID: 29934395DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Thuvaraha Vanniyasingam
- Organization
- Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Canada
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Harsha Shanthanna, MD
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton/McMaster University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James Paul, MD
Hamilton Health Sciences/McMaster University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2014
First Posted
August 22, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2019
Study Completion
March 1, 2019
Last Updated
December 11, 2023
Results First Posted
December 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03