Spinal Morphine vs. Hydromorphone for Pain Control After Cesarean Delivery
Intrathecal Morphine Versus Intrathecal Hydromorphone for Analgesia Following Cesarean Delivery
1 other identifier
interventional
134
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Intrathecal (IT) opioids are commonly administered with local anesthetic during spinal anesthesia for post-Cesarean delivery analgesia. Traditionally, IT morphine has been used but the use of IT hydromorphone is growing. A previous study has shown that the effective dose for postoperative analgesia in 90% patients (ED90) for both IT hydromorphone and IT morphine (NCT02009722). These doses were found to be 75 mcg for hydromorphone and 150 mcg for morphine. The current proposed study would compare the duration of analgesia of IT morphine vs IT hydromorphone after elective cesarean delivery. Additionally, the investigators will compare each drug with respect the incidence of nausea and pruritus.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 31, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 15, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 25, 2019
CompletedApril 25, 2019
March 1, 2019
1.3 years
May 31, 2016
March 29, 2019
April 24, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
NRS Score for Pain (0-10) With Movement 24 Hours After Spinal Administration
Each patient will be interviewed by a member of the study team 24 hours after receiving their spinal anesthetic. Patients will be asked to rate their current level of pain on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
24 hours after administration of spinal anesthesia
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Nausea
24 hours after administration of spinal anesthesia
Pruritus
24 hours after administration of spinal anesthesia
Study Arms (2)
Intrathecal hydromorphone
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be randomized to receive a one time dose of 75 mcg intrathecal hydromorphone as part of their spinal anesthesia.
Intrathecal morphine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be randomized to receive a one time dose of 150 mcg intrathecal morphine as part of their spinal anesthesia.
Interventions
Morphine is administered as part of spinal anesthesia for post-operative pain relief.
Hydromorphone is administered as part of spinal anesthesia for post-operative pain relief.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II-III women presenting for elective cesarean delivery
- Term gestation (37-42 weeks)
- Desire to have a spinal anesthesia technique for cesarean delivery
You may not qualify if:
- Any contraindication to the administration of a spinal technique for anesthesia
- History of intolerance or adverse reaction to opioid medications
- Chronic pain syndrome or current opioid use \>30 oral morphine equivalents/day
- Allergy or intolerance to acetaminophen, ketorolac, ibuprofen, or oxycodone
- Current BMI \> 50
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Related Publications (9)
Bucklin BA, Hawkins JL, Anderson JR, Ullrich FA. Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey: twenty-year update. Anesthesiology. 2005 Sep;103(3):645-53. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200509000-00030. No abstract available.
PMID: 16129992BACKGROUNDSviggum HP, Arendt KW, Jacob AK, Niesen AD, Johnson RL, Schroeder DR, Tien M, Mantilla CB. Intrathecal Hydromorphone and Morphine for Postcesarean Delivery Analgesia: Determination of the ED90 Using a Sequential Allocation Biased-Coin Method. Anesth Analg. 2016 Sep;123(3):690-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001229.
PMID: 26974022BACKGROUNDGehling M, Tryba M. Risks and side-effects of intrathecal morphine combined with spinal anaesthesia: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2009 Jun;64(6):643-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05817.x.
PMID: 19462494BACKGROUNDPalmer CM, Emerson S, Volgoropolous D, Alves D. Dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1999 Feb;90(2):437-44. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199902000-00018.
PMID: 9952150BACKGROUNDTerajima K, Onodera H, Kobayashi M, Yamanaka H, Ohno T, Konuma S, Ogawa R. Efficacy of intrathecal morphine for analgesia following elective cesarean section: comparison with previous delivery. J Nippon Med Sch. 2003 Aug;70(4):327-33. doi: 10.1272/jnms.70.327.
PMID: 12928713BACKGROUNDBeatty NC, Arendt KW, Niesen AD, Wittwer ED, Jacob AK. Analgesia after Cesarean delivery: a retrospective comparison of intrathecal hydromorphone and morphine. J Clin Anesth. 2013 Aug;25(5):379-383. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.01.014. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
PMID: 23965210BACKGROUNDRauch E. Intrathecal hydromorphone for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery: a retrospective study. AANA J. 2012 Aug;80(4 Suppl):S25-32.
PMID: 23248827BACKGROUNDRauch E. Intrathecal hydromorphone for cesarean delivery: in search of improved postoperative pain management: a case report. AANA J. 2011 Oct;79(5):427-32.
PMID: 23256273BACKGROUNDNortcliffe SA, Shah J, Buggy DJ. Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after spinal morphine for Caesarean section: comparison of cyclizine, dexamethasone and placebo. Br J Anaesth. 2003 May;90(5):665-70. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg120.
PMID: 12697596BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Hans P. Sviggum
- Organization
- Mayo Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hans P Sviggum
Mayo Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PI
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 31, 2016
First Posted
June 3, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
September 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 15, 2018
Last Updated
April 25, 2019
Results First Posted
April 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share