The Effectiveness of Hand Massage on the Pain of Cardiac Surgery Critically Ill
1 other identifier
interventional
76
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Postoperative pain is a common phenomenon in the intensive care unit (ICU) despite the multitude of efforts dedicated to promote its effective relief. Mounting evidence shows that cardiac surgery ICU patients experience moderate to severe pain reaching proportions as high as 74% despite the use of analgesics. The highest pain intensity is experienced in the first 24 hours post surgery when patients are still in the ICU, and represents a strong predictor for the presence and severity of persistent postoperative pain. To maximize pain relief, massage has been suggested in the recent clinical practice guidelines of the Society of Critical-Care Medicine as a complementary non-pharmacological therapy in the ICU given its opioid-sparing and analgesia-enhancing potential. Some randomized controlled trials showed promising pain relief effects of massage when administered to cardiac surgery patients in acute care units, however, its effects on pain relief while patients are still in the ICU and when pain severity is highest remain unknown. This study aims to compare the effect of three 20-minute hand massage administrations within 24 hours postop on the pain intensity (primary outcome), pain unpleasantness, pain interference, muscle tension, anxiety and vital signs (blood pressure, heart and respiratory rates) of adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients post cardiac surgery versus hand holding (i.e., simple touch) and standard care. Other objectives are to describe the location and quality of pain of cardiac surgery ICU patients. Hypothesis: Patients receiving 3 hand massages within 24 hours postop will have lower pain intensity, unpleasantness and interference, muscle tension, anxiety and vital signs compared to patients receiving hand holding and to those in the standard care group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pain
Started Apr 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 10, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2017
CompletedApril 27, 2016
April 1, 2016
1 year
February 3, 2016
April 25, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
change in pain intensity from pre- to post-intervention as assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale
Pain intensity will be captured using the 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale score, and the analysis metric will be the change in pain intensity from baseline (pre-intervention) to immediately after each intervention. For each study group, means and standard deviations of patients' pain intensity levels will be reported. Change in pain intensity levels will be assessed for each of the three interventions administered within 24 hours postop.
before and immediately after each intervention within 24 hours postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (14)
change in pain unpleasantness from pre- to post-intervention as assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale
before and immediately after each intervention within 24 hours postop
change in muscle tension from pre- to post-intervention by performing passive flexion and extension of patient's arm, and scoring 0 (relaxed), 1 (tense) or 2 (very tense/rigid)
before and immediately after each intervention within 24 hours postop
change in anxiety from pre- to post-intervention as assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale
before and immediately after each intervention within 24 hours postop
changes in 1-minute blood pressure average from pre- to post-intervention as assessed using a data collection computer connected to patient's bedside monitor
before and immediately after each intervention within 24 hours postop
changes in 1-minute heart rate average from pre- to post-intervention as assessed using a data collection computer connected to patient's bedside monitor
before and immediately after each intervention within 24 hours postop
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
hand massage
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive a 20 minute hand massage by a trained nurse in addition to the standard ICU care. Before administering the massage, a favorable environment will be created that promotes calmness such as dampening the light, reducing the alarm intensity, closing the curtains and the door and posting the notice "do not disturb", and a comfortable positioning of the patient will be ensured. The interventionist will hold each hand for 5-10 seconds, and apply 5-10 ml of unscented hypoallergenic cream to both hands and wrists. Then, she will perform massage using moderate pressure, and the stroking and kneading techniques during ten minutes on the palm and back of each hand.
hand holding
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe active control group will receive hand holding by the same trained nurse in addition to standard ICU care. The same hand hygiene and environmental adjustments will be made as for those receiving massage. Patients will have their hands held for 5-10 seconds and unscented hypoallergenic cream applied to both hands. Then, the interventionist will hold each of the patients' hand in her hand for ten minutes without performing any tissue manipulation. The hand holding procedure will last for a total of 20 minutes.
rest group
OTHERThe passive control group will have a 20 minutes rest period including the same environmental adjustments as the massage and hand holding groups in addition to the standard care administered in the ICU. The standard care includes the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments used to promote recovery and symptom relief. In the study ICU, cardiac surgery patients are automatically prescribed a pain management protocol that includes the regular administration of morphine, unless extraordinary patient circumstances require different prescriptions. Patients might equally receive breakthrough doses of analgesia in addition to regular opioids. Of the existing non-pharmacological interventions, repositioning and back rubs are commonly employed in the study ICU to provide patient comfort.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- able to speak French or English
- elective cardiac surgery requiring sternal incision (e.g., coronary artery bypass graft, valve replacement)
- able to answer questions and self-report symptoms
You may not qualify if:
- previous cardiac surgery
- diagnostic of cognitive or psychiatric disorder
- pulmonary artery pressure \>50 mmHg
- right ventricular failure
- systolic left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction 35% or less)
- body mass index \> 30
- prolonged bleeding from the chest drainage tubes (i.e., \>200 ml/h)
- having mechanical blood pressure support (e.g., intra-aortic balloon pump)
- receiving cardiac pacing with complete control of HR
- peripheral intravenous line in the hands
- suppurating/infective/inflammatory skin condition of the hands
- hypersensitivity to touch.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada
Related Publications (4)
Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, Ely EW, Gelinas C, Dasta JF, Davidson JE, Devlin JW, Kress JP, Joffe AM, Coursin DB, Herr DL, Tung A, Robinson BR, Fontaine DK, Ramsay MA, Riker RR, Sessler CN, Pun B, Skrobik Y, Jaeschke R; American College of Critical Care Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):263-306. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72.
PMID: 23269131BACKGROUNDBauer BA, Cutshall SM, Wentworth LJ, Engen D, Messner PK, Wood CM, Brekke KM, Kelly RF, Sundt TM 3rd. Effect of massage therapy on pain, anxiety, and tension after cardiac surgery: a randomized study. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2010 May;16(2):70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2009.06.012. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
PMID: 20347836BACKGROUNDBraun LA, Stanguts C, Casanelia L, Spitzer O, Paul E, Vardaxis NJ, Rosenfeldt F. Massage therapy for cardiac surgery patients--a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Dec;144(6):1453-9, 1459.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.04.027. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
PMID: 22964355BACKGROUNDBoitor M, Martorella G, Laizner AM, Maheu C, Gelinas C. The Effectiveness of Hand Massage on Pain in Critically Ill Patients After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Nov 7;5(4):e203. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6277.
PMID: 27821384DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Celine Gelinas, PhD
McGill University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2016
First Posted
February 10, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 1, 2017
Study Completion
April 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 27, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04