A Study of Guselkumab in the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis With Randomized Withdrawal and Retreatment
VOYAGE 2
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active Comparator-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab for the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis With Randomized Withdrawal and Retreatment
3 other identifiers
interventional
992
9 countries
93
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of guselkumab (CNTO 1959) in the treatment of participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis (scaly skin rash).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Nov 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_3
93 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 3, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 6, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2020
CompletedJuly 22, 2021
June 1, 2021
11 months
July 31, 2014
August 4, 2017
June 29, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Placebo Group at Week 16
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants' psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Placebo Group at Week 16
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these area was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score.
Week 16
Secondary Outcomes (18)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 24
Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 24
Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 24
Week 24
Cumulative Maintenance Rate of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response in the Placebo Group Compared to the Guselkumab Group Through Week 48 to Evaluate Loss of a PASI 90 Response
Through Week 48
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 16 in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Placebo Group
Baseline, Week 16
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Group I
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive guselkumab 100 milligram (mg) at Weeks 0, 4, 12 and 20. Starting at Week 28, participants will receive guselkumab 100 mg or placebo through Week 72 depending upon randomized treatment group and PASI response. Placebo for guselkumab at Week 16, starting at Week 28, participants will continue to receive placebo for guselkumab through Week 72 depending upon randomized treatment group and PASI response. Placebo for adalimumab \[two 0.8 milliliter (mL) injections\] at Week 0 followed by one 0.8 mL injection at Weeks 1, 3, 5, and every 2 week (q2w) through Week 23 to maintain the blind. All participants will receive guselkumab q8w starting at Week 76 through Week 252.
Group II
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants will receive placebo for guselkumab at weeks 0, 4, 12 and starting at week 28 thereafter up to week 72 depending upon PASI response. Placebo for adalimumab (two 0.8 mL injections) at week 0, followed by one 0.8 mL injection at weeks 1, 3, and 5, and q2w through week 23. At week 16, placebo participants will cross over to receive guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16 and 20, starting at week 28, participants will continue to receive guselkumab 100 mg or placebo through week 72 depending upon PASI response. All participants will received guselkumab q8w starting at Week 76 through Week 252.
Group III
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive adalimumab 80 mg (two 40 mg \[0.8 mL\] injections) at Week 0 followed by adalimumab 40 mg at weeks 1, 3, 5, and q2w through week 23 and placebo for guselkumab at weeks 0, 4, 12, 16, and 20. Participants will receive guselkumab or placebo starting at week 28 through week 72 depending upon PASI response. All participants will received guselkumab q8w starting at Week 76 through Week 252.
Interventions
100 mg by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 4, 12, and 20. Starting at Week 28, participants will continue to receive guselkumab 100 mg through Week 72 depending upon randomized treatment group and PASI response (Group I). 100 mg by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 16 and 20. Starting at Week 28, participants will continue to receive guselkumab 100 mg through Week 72 depending upon PASI response (Group II). Starting at Week 28, participants will receive guselkumab 100 mg through Week 72 depending upon PASI response (Group III). All participants will receive guselkumab q8w starting at Week 76 through Week 252.
Placebo for guselkumab at Week 16, starting at Week 28, participants will continue to receive placebo for guselkumab through Week 72 depending on randomized treatment group and PASI response (Group I), at weeks 0, 4, 12 and starting at week 28 thereafter up to week 72 depending upon PASI response (Group II), at weeks 0, 4, 12, 16, and 20, starting at week 28 through week 72 depending upon PASI response (Group III).
80 mg by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, then 40 mg at Week 1 and every 2 weeks (q2w) thereafter through Week 23.
Placebo for adalimumab \[two 0.8 milliliter (mL) injections\] at week 0 followed by one 0.8 mL injection at weeks 1, 3, 5, and every 2 week (q2w) through Week 23 (Group I and II).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Have a diagnosis of plaque-type psoriasis (with or without psoriatic arthritis) at least 6 months before the first administration of study agent
- Have a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) greater than or equal to (\>=) 12 at Screening and at Baseline
- Have an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score \>=3 at Screening and at Baseline
- Have an involved body surface area (BSA) \>=10 percent (%) at Screening and at Baseline
- Must be a candidate for either systemic therapy or phototherapy for psoriasis
You may not qualify if:
- Participants with nonplaque forms of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular) or with current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
- Participants who have ever received guselkumab or adalimumab
- History or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
- Has any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation not be in the best interest (for example, compromise the well-being) of the participant or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments
- Is pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy (both men and women) within 5 months following the last administration of study drug
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (93)
Unknown Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Bakersfield, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Santa Monica, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Coral Gables, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Newnan, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Sandy Springs, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Rolling Meadows, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Skokie, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Plainfield, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Andover, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Gratiot, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Troy, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Gahanna, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Norman, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Johnston, Rhode Island, United States
Unknown Facility
Arlington, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Seattle, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Spokane, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Benowa, Australia
Unknown Facility
Hectorville, Australia
Unknown Facility
Melbourne, Australia
Unknown Facility
Parkville, Australia
Unknown Facility
Westmead, Australia
Unknown Facility
Woolloongabba, Australia
Unknown Facility
Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Jihlava, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Náchod, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Pardubice, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Pilsen, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Prague, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Ústí nad Labem, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Dresden, Germany
Unknown Facility
Gera, Germany
Unknown Facility
Hamburg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Kiel, Germany
Unknown Facility
Leipzig, Germany
Unknown Facility
Lübeck, Germany
Unknown Facility
Münster, Germany
Unknown Facility
Tübingen, Germany
Unknown Facility
Witten, Germany
Unknown Facility
Bialystok, Poland
Unknown Facility
Bydgoszcz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Gdansk, Poland
Unknown Facility
Krakow, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lodz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lublin, Poland
Unknown Facility
Olsztyn, Poland
Unknown Facility
Poznan, Poland
Unknown Facility
Torun, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Wroclaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Chelyabinsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Cherepovets, Russia
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
Rostov-on-Don, Russia
Unknown Facility
Ryazan, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Yaroslavl, Russia
Unknown Facility
Busan, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Daejeon, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Gwangju, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Incheon, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Seongnam, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Seoul, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Suwon, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Badalona, Spain
Unknown Facility
Barcelona, Spain
Unknown Facility
Bilbao Vizcaya, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, Spain
Unknown Facility
Murcia, Spain
Unknown Facility
Pontevedra, Spain
Unknown Facility
Valencia, Spain
Related Publications (10)
Strober B, Coates LC, Lebwohl MG, Deodhar A, Leibowitz E, Rowland K, Kollmeier AP, Miller M, Wang Y, Li S, Chakravarty SD, Chan D, Shawi M, Yang YW, Thaҫi D, Rahman P. Long-Term Safety of Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Disease: An Integrated Analysis of Eleven Phase II/III Clinical Studies in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. Drug Saf. 2024 Jan;47(1):39-57. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01361-w. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
PMID: 37906417DERIVEDKim BS, Jo SJ, Youn S, Reich K, Saadoun C, Chang CL, Yang YW, Huang YH, Tsai TF. Five-year Maintenance of Clinical Response and Consistent Safety Profile for Guselkumab in Asian patients with Psoriasis from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Nov;13(11):2721-2737. doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-01026-7. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
PMID: 37750995DERIVEDTillett W, Egeberg A, Sonkoly E, Gorecki P, Tjarnlund A, Buyze J, Wegner S, McGonagle D. Nail psoriasis dynamics during biologic treatment and withdrawal in patients with psoriasis who may be at high risk of developing psoriatic arthritis: a post hoc analysis of the VOYAGE 2 randomized trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2023 Sep 15;25(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03138-z.
PMID: 37715294DERIVEDOrbai AM, Chakravarty SD, You Y, Shawi M, Yang YW, Merola JF. Efficacy of Guselkumab in Treating Nails, Scalp, Hands, and Feet in Patients with Psoriasis and Self-reported Psoriatic Arthritis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Nov;13(11):2859-2868. doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-01012-z. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
PMID: 37713133DERIVEDReich K, Gordon KB, Strober BE, Armstrong AW, Miller M, Shen YK, You Y, Han C, Yang YW, Foley P, Griffiths CEM. Five-year maintenance of clinical response and health-related quality of life improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with guselkumab: results from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2. Br J Dermatol. 2021 Dec;185(6):1146-1159. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20568. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
PMID: 34105767DERIVEDReich K, Armstrong AW, Foley P, Song M, Miller M, Shen YK, You Y, Han C, Gordon KB. Maintenance of Response Through up to 4 Years of Continuous Guselkumab Treatment of Psoriasis in the VOYAGE 2 Phase 3 Study. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020 Dec;21(6):881-890. doi: 10.1007/s40257-020-00555-7.
PMID: 32910434DERIVEDGordon KB, Armstrong AW, Foley P, Song M, Shen YK, Li S, Munoz-Elias EJ, Branigan P, Liu X, Reich K. Guselkumab Efficacy after Withdrawal Is Associated with Suppression of Serum IL-23-Regulated IL-17 and IL-22 in Psoriasis: VOYAGE 2 Study. J Invest Dermatol. 2019 Dec;139(12):2437-2446.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
PMID: 31207232DERIVEDReich K, Papp KA, Armstrong AW, Wasfi Y, Li S, Shen YK, Randazzo B, Song M, Kimball AB. Safety of guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated through 100 weeks: a pooled analysis from the randomized VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 studies. Br J Dermatol. 2019 May;180(5):1039-1049. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17454.
PMID: 30485400DERIVEDArmstrong AW, Reich K, Foley P, Han C, Song M, Shen YK, You Y, Papp KA. Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes (Dermatology Life Quality Index and the Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary) with Guselkumab in Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Results from the Phase III VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019 Feb;20(1):155-164. doi: 10.1007/s40257-018-0396-z.
PMID: 30417277DERIVEDFoley P, Gordon K, Griffiths CEM, Wasfi Y, Randazzo B, Song M, Li S, Shen YK, Blauvelt A. Efficacy of Guselkumab Compared With Adalimumab and Placebo for Psoriasis in Specific Body Regions: A Secondary Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Jun 1;154(6):676-683. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.0793.
PMID: 29799960DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
All participants were on guselkumab after Week 76; therefore, there was no concurrent control group within the study after Week 76.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Director
- Organization
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2014
First Posted
August 4, 2014
Study Start
November 3, 2014
Primary Completion
October 1, 2015
Study Completion
July 1, 2020
Last Updated
July 22, 2021
Results First Posted
November 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2021-06