NCT02207244

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of guselkumab (CNTO 1959) in the treatment of participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis (scaly skin rash).

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
992

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2014

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
9 countries

93 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 31, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 4, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 3, 2014

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2015

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 6, 2017

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

July 22, 2021

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

July 31, 2014

Results QC Date

August 4, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 29, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

PsoriasisPlaque-type psoriasisGuselkumabAdalimumabCNTO 1959Monoclonal antibody

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Placebo Group at Week 16

    The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants' psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

    Week 16

  • Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Placebo Group at Week 16

    The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these area was assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score.

    Week 16

Secondary Outcomes (18)

  • Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 24

    Week 24

  • Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 24

    Week 24

  • Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Adalimumab Group at Week 24

    Week 24

  • Cumulative Maintenance Rate of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response in the Placebo Group Compared to the Guselkumab Group Through Week 48 to Evaluate Loss of a PASI 90 Response

    Through Week 48

  • Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 16 in the Guselkumab Group Compared to the Placebo Group

    Baseline, Week 16

  • +13 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Group I

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive guselkumab 100 milligram (mg) at Weeks 0, 4, 12 and 20. Starting at Week 28, participants will receive guselkumab 100 mg or placebo through Week 72 depending upon randomized treatment group and PASI response. Placebo for guselkumab at Week 16, starting at Week 28, participants will continue to receive placebo for guselkumab through Week 72 depending upon randomized treatment group and PASI response. Placebo for adalimumab \[two 0.8 milliliter (mL) injections\] at Week 0 followed by one 0.8 mL injection at Weeks 1, 3, 5, and every 2 week (q2w) through Week 23 to maintain the blind. All participants will receive guselkumab q8w starting at Week 76 through Week 252.

Drug: Guselkumab 100 mgDrug: Placebo for guselkumabDrug: Placebo for adalimumab

Group II

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants will receive placebo for guselkumab at weeks 0, 4, 12 and starting at week 28 thereafter up to week 72 depending upon PASI response. Placebo for adalimumab (two 0.8 mL injections) at week 0, followed by one 0.8 mL injection at weeks 1, 3, and 5, and q2w through week 23. At week 16, placebo participants will cross over to receive guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16 and 20, starting at week 28, participants will continue to receive guselkumab 100 mg or placebo through week 72 depending upon PASI response. All participants will received guselkumab q8w starting at Week 76 through Week 252.

Drug: Guselkumab 100 mgDrug: Placebo for guselkumabDrug: Placebo for adalimumab

Group III

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will receive adalimumab 80 mg (two 40 mg \[0.8 mL\] injections) at Week 0 followed by adalimumab 40 mg at weeks 1, 3, 5, and q2w through week 23 and placebo for guselkumab at weeks 0, 4, 12, 16, and 20. Participants will receive guselkumab or placebo starting at week 28 through week 72 depending upon PASI response. All participants will received guselkumab q8w starting at Week 76 through Week 252.

Drug: Guselkumab 100 mgDrug: Placebo for guselkumabDrug: Adalimumab

Interventions

100 mg by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 4, 12, and 20. Starting at Week 28, participants will continue to receive guselkumab 100 mg through Week 72 depending upon randomized treatment group and PASI response (Group I). 100 mg by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 16 and 20. Starting at Week 28, participants will continue to receive guselkumab 100 mg through Week 72 depending upon PASI response (Group II). Starting at Week 28, participants will receive guselkumab 100 mg through Week 72 depending upon PASI response (Group III). All participants will receive guselkumab q8w starting at Week 76 through Week 252.

Also known as: CNTO 1959
Group IGroup IIGroup III

Placebo for guselkumab at Week 16, starting at Week 28, participants will continue to receive placebo for guselkumab through Week 72 depending on randomized treatment group and PASI response (Group I), at weeks 0, 4, 12 and starting at week 28 thereafter up to week 72 depending upon PASI response (Group II), at weeks 0, 4, 12, 16, and 20, starting at week 28 through week 72 depending upon PASI response (Group III).

Group IGroup IIGroup III

80 mg by subcutaneous injection at Week 0, then 40 mg at Week 1 and every 2 weeks (q2w) thereafter through Week 23.

Also known as: HUMIRA®
Group III

Placebo for adalimumab \[two 0.8 milliliter (mL) injections\] at week 0 followed by one 0.8 mL injection at weeks 1, 3, 5, and every 2 week (q2w) through Week 23 (Group I and II).

Group IGroup II

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Have a diagnosis of plaque-type psoriasis (with or without psoriatic arthritis) at least 6 months before the first administration of study agent
  • Have a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) greater than or equal to (\>=) 12 at Screening and at Baseline
  • Have an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score \>=3 at Screening and at Baseline
  • Have an involved body surface area (BSA) \>=10 percent (%) at Screening and at Baseline
  • Must be a candidate for either systemic therapy or phototherapy for psoriasis

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants with nonplaque forms of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular) or with current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
  • Participants who have ever received guselkumab or adalimumab
  • History or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
  • Has any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation not be in the best interest (for example, compromise the well-being) of the participant or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments
  • Is pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy (both men and women) within 5 months following the last administration of study drug

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (93)

Unknown Facility

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bakersfield, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Los Angeles, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Diego, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Santa Monica, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tampa, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Newnan, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sandy Springs, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rolling Meadows, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Skokie, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Plainfield, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Andover, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fort Gratiot, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Troy, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New York, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Gahanna, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Norman, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Portland, Oregon, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Johnston, Rhode Island, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Arlington, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Seattle, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Spokane, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Benowa, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Hectorville, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Melbourne, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Parkville, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Westmead, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Woolloongabba, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Barrie, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Jihlava, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Náchod, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Pardubice, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Pilsen, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Prague, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Ústí nad Labem, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Dresden, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Gera, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Hamburg, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Kiel, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Leipzig, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Lübeck, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Münster, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Tübingen, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Witten, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Bialystok, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Bydgoszcz, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Gdansk, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Krakow, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Lodz, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Lublin, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Olsztyn, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Poznan, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Torun, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Warsaw, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Wroclaw, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Chelyabinsk, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Cherepovets, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Moscow, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Ryazan, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Yaroslavl, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Busan, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Daejeon, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Gwangju, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Incheon, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Seongnam, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Suwon, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Badalona, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Barcelona, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Bilbao Vizcaya, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Madrid, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Murcia, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Pontevedra, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Valencia, Spain

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Strober B, Coates LC, Lebwohl MG, Deodhar A, Leibowitz E, Rowland K, Kollmeier AP, Miller M, Wang Y, Li S, Chakravarty SD, Chan D, Shawi M, Yang YW, Thaҫi D, Rahman P. Long-Term Safety of Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Disease: An Integrated Analysis of Eleven Phase II/III Clinical Studies in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. Drug Saf. 2024 Jan;47(1):39-57. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01361-w. Epub 2023 Oct 31.

  • Kim BS, Jo SJ, Youn S, Reich K, Saadoun C, Chang CL, Yang YW, Huang YH, Tsai TF. Five-year Maintenance of Clinical Response and Consistent Safety Profile for Guselkumab in Asian patients with Psoriasis from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Nov;13(11):2721-2737. doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-01026-7. Epub 2023 Sep 26.

  • Tillett W, Egeberg A, Sonkoly E, Gorecki P, Tjarnlund A, Buyze J, Wegner S, McGonagle D. Nail psoriasis dynamics during biologic treatment and withdrawal in patients with psoriasis who may be at high risk of developing psoriatic arthritis: a post hoc analysis of the VOYAGE 2 randomized trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2023 Sep 15;25(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03138-z.

  • Orbai AM, Chakravarty SD, You Y, Shawi M, Yang YW, Merola JF. Efficacy of Guselkumab in Treating Nails, Scalp, Hands, and Feet in Patients with Psoriasis and Self-reported Psoriatic Arthritis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Nov;13(11):2859-2868. doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-01012-z. Epub 2023 Sep 15.

  • Reich K, Gordon KB, Strober BE, Armstrong AW, Miller M, Shen YK, You Y, Han C, Yang YW, Foley P, Griffiths CEM. Five-year maintenance of clinical response and health-related quality of life improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with guselkumab: results from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2. Br J Dermatol. 2021 Dec;185(6):1146-1159. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20568. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

  • Reich K, Armstrong AW, Foley P, Song M, Miller M, Shen YK, You Y, Han C, Gordon KB. Maintenance of Response Through up to 4 Years of Continuous Guselkumab Treatment of Psoriasis in the VOYAGE 2 Phase 3 Study. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020 Dec;21(6):881-890. doi: 10.1007/s40257-020-00555-7.

  • Gordon KB, Armstrong AW, Foley P, Song M, Shen YK, Li S, Munoz-Elias EJ, Branigan P, Liu X, Reich K. Guselkumab Efficacy after Withdrawal Is Associated with Suppression of Serum IL-23-Regulated IL-17 and IL-22 in Psoriasis: VOYAGE 2 Study. J Invest Dermatol. 2019 Dec;139(12):2437-2446.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 Jun 15.

  • Reich K, Papp KA, Armstrong AW, Wasfi Y, Li S, Shen YK, Randazzo B, Song M, Kimball AB. Safety of guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated through 100 weeks: a pooled analysis from the randomized VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 studies. Br J Dermatol. 2019 May;180(5):1039-1049. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17454.

  • Armstrong AW, Reich K, Foley P, Han C, Song M, Shen YK, You Y, Papp KA. Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes (Dermatology Life Quality Index and the Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary) with Guselkumab in Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Results from the Phase III VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 Studies. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019 Feb;20(1):155-164. doi: 10.1007/s40257-018-0396-z.

  • Foley P, Gordon K, Griffiths CEM, Wasfi Y, Randazzo B, Song M, Li S, Shen YK, Blauvelt A. Efficacy of Guselkumab Compared With Adalimumab and Placebo for Psoriasis in Specific Body Regions: A Secondary Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Jun 1;154(6):676-683. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.0793.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psoriasis

Interventions

guselkumabAdalimumab

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin Diseases, PapulosquamousSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulins

Limitations and Caveats

All participants were on guselkumab after Week 76; therefore, there was no concurrent control group within the study after Week 76.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Senior Director
Organization
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Study Officials

  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

    Janssen Research & Development, LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2014

First Posted

August 4, 2014

Study Start

November 3, 2014

Primary Completion

October 1, 2015

Study Completion

July 1, 2020

Last Updated

July 22, 2021

Results First Posted

November 6, 2017

Record last verified: 2021-06

Locations