NCT02203032

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab (CNTO 1959) in the treatment of participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis (scaly skin rash) who had inadequate response to ustekinumab.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
872

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2014

Geographic Reach
10 countries

85 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 25, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 29, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 7, 2014

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 25, 2015

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 24, 2016

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 17, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

September 12, 2017

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

July 25, 2014

Results QC Date

June 14, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 11, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

PsoriasisPlaque-type psoriasisGuselkumabUstekinumabCNTO 1959Monoclonal antibody

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Visits at Which Participants Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) and at Least a 2 Grade Improvement (From Week 16) From Week 28 Through Week 40

    The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).

    Week 28 through Week 40

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Number of Visits at Which Participants Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response From Week 28 Through Week 40

    Week 28 through Week 40

  • Number of Visits at Which Participants Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0) From Week 28 Through Week 40

    Week 28 through Week 40

  • Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) and at Least a 2 Grade Improvement (From Week 16) at Week 28

    Week 28

Study Arms (3)

Open-label ustekinumab

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Ustekinumab

Double-blind guselkumab

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: GuselkumabDrug: Placebo for ustekinumab

Double-blind ustekinumab

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: UstekinumabDrug: Placebo for guselkumab

Interventions

45 mg or 90 mg given by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0 and 4 for all participants. Participants with an IGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 16 will also receive ustekinumab every 12 weeks (q12w) from Week 16 to Week 40.

Double-blind ustekinumabOpen-label ustekinumab

100 mg given by subcutaneous injection at Weeks 16 and 20 and every 8 weeks (q8w) thereafter through Week 44.

Double-blind guselkumab

Subcutaneous injection at Weeks 16, 28, and 40 to maintain the blind for participants randomized to treatment with guselkumab.

Double-blind guselkumab

Subcutaneous injection at Weeks 16 and 20 and q8w thereafter through Week 44 to maintain the blind for participants randomized to treatment with ustekinumab.

Double-blind ustekinumab

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Have a diagnosis of plaque-type psoriasis (with or without psoriatic arthritis for at least 6 months before the first administration of study drug
  • Have a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) greater than or equal to (\>=) 12 at Screening and at Baseline
  • Have an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) \>=3 at Screening and at Baseline
  • Have an involved body surface area (BSA) \>= 10 percent (%) at Screening and at Baseline
  • Be a candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for psoriasis (either naïve or history of previous treatment)

You may not qualify if:

  • Has a history or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
  • Has unstable cardiovascular disease, defined as a recent clinical deterioration (example \[eg\], unstable angina, rapid atrial fibrillation) in the last 3 months or a cardiac hospitalization within the last 3 months
  • Currently has a malignancy or has a history of malignancy within 5 years before Screening (with the exception of a nonmelanoma skin cancer that has been adequately treated with no evidence of recurrence for at least 3 months before the first study drug administration, or cervical carcinoma in situ that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence for at least 3 months before the first study drug administration)
  • Has previously received guselkumab or ustekinumab

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (85)

Unknown Facility

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bakersfield, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Los Angeles, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Santa Monica, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Ocala, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Alpharetta, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Skokie, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Plainfield, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Troy, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Buffalo, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New York, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Portland, Oregon, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Johnston, Rhode Island, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Arlington, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Austin, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Dallas, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Webster, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Spokane, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fremantle, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Victoria Park, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Woden, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Woolloongabba, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Ajax, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Berlin, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Bonn, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Essen, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Gera, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Hamburg, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Leipzig, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Lübeck, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Mahlow, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Münster, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Witten, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Bialystok, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Bydgoszcz, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Gdansk, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Krakow, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Lodz, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Lublin, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Olsztyn, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Poznan, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Torun, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Warsaw, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Wroclaw, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Chelyabinsk, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Krasnodar, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Lipetsk, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Stavropol, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Ufa, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Yekaterinburg, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Anyang, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Incheon, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

A Coruña, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Alcorcón, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Alicante, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Barcelona, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Madrid, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Taichung, Taiwan

Location

Unknown Facility

Tainan, Taiwan

Location

Unknown Facility

Taipei, Taiwan

Location

Unknown Facility

Taoyuan District, Taiwan

Location

Unknown Facility

Dudley, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Dundee, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

London, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Salford, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Strober B, Coates LC, Lebwohl MG, Deodhar A, Leibowitz E, Rowland K, Kollmeier AP, Miller M, Wang Y, Li S, Chakravarty SD, Chan D, Shawi M, Yang YW, Thaҫi D, Rahman P. Long-Term Safety of Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Disease: An Integrated Analysis of Eleven Phase II/III Clinical Studies in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis. Drug Saf. 2024 Jan;47(1):39-57. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01361-w. Epub 2023 Oct 31.

  • Campbell K, Li K, Yang F, Branigan P, Elloso MM, Benson J, Orlovsky Y, Chen Y, Garcet S, Krueger JG. Guselkumab More Effectively Neutralizes Psoriasis-Associated Histologic, Transcriptomic, and Clinical Measures than Ustekinumab. Immunohorizons. 2023 Apr 1;7(4):273-285. doi: 10.4049/immunohorizons.2300003.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psoriasis

Interventions

Ustekinumabguselkumab

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin Diseases, PapulosquamousSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulins

Results Point of Contact

Title
Senior Director
Organization
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Study Officials

  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

    Janssen Research & Development, LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2014

First Posted

July 29, 2014

Study Start

October 7, 2014

Primary Completion

December 25, 2015

Study Completion

May 24, 2016

Last Updated

September 12, 2017

Results First Posted

July 17, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-08

Locations