NCT02201251

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of topiramate monotherapy compared with levetiracetam another standard antiepileptic drug (AED), as monotherapy for new-onset or recent-onset epilepsy (seizure disorder) on pediatric growth and maturation, bone mineralization, and kidney stone formation in children aged 2 to 15 years.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
63

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2014

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
13 countries

40 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 24, 2014

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 28, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 6, 2014

Completed
5.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2020

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 17, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

April 29, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5.6 years

First QC Date

July 24, 2014

Results QC Date

April 23, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 25, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

EpilepsyTopiramateLevetiracetamPediatric

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (14)

  • Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score up to Month 1

    The Z-Score indicates how many standard deviations (SD) a participant has from the population normal values. The body weight z-scores were designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that was expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. Body weight data were converted to Z-scores using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) programs provided by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for the calculation of the 2000 CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 1 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.

    Baseline up to Month 1

  • Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score up to Month 3

    The Z-Score indicates how many SD a participant has from the population normal values. The body weight z-scores were designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that was expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. Body weight data were converted to Z-scores using the SAS programs provided by the CDC for the calculation of the 2000 CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 3 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.

    Baseline up to Month 3

  • Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score up to Month 6

    The Z-Score indicates how many SD a participant has from the population normal values. The body weight z-scores were designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that was expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. Body weight data were converted to Z-scores using the SAS programs provided by the CDC for the calculation of the 2000 CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 6 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.

    Baseline up to Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score up to Month 9

    The Z-Score indicates how many SD a participant has from the population normal values. The body weight z-scores were designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that was expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. Body weight data were converted to Z-scores using the SAS programs provided by the CDC for the calculation of the 2000 CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up yo Month 9 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.

    Baseline up to Month 9

  • Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score up to Month 12

    The Z-Score indicates how many SD a participant has from the population normal values. The body weight z-scores were designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that was expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. Body weight data were converted to Z-scores using the SAS programs provided by the CDC for the calculation of the 2000 CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline to Month 12 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.

    Baseline up to Month 12

  • Change From Baseline in Height Z-score up to Month 1

    Z-Score was a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It described whether a mean was above or below the standard and how unusual the measurement is with range from minus (-) 3 to plus (+) 3; 0 equal to (=) same mean, greater than (\>) 0 a greater mean, and less than (\<) 0 a lesser mean than the standard. Growth parameters were compared to a standard defined by CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 1 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.

    Baseline up to Month 1

  • Change From Baseline in Height Z-score up to Month 3

    Z-Score was a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It described whether a mean was above or below the standard and how unusual the measurement is with range from -3 to +3; 0 =same mean, \>0 a greater mean, and \<0 a lesser mean than the standard. Growth parameters were compared to a standard defined by CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 3 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.

    Baseline up to Month 3

  • Change From Baseline in Height Z-score up to Month 6

    Z-Score was a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It described whether a mean was above or below the standard and how unusual the measurement is with range from -3 to +3; 0 =same mean, \>0 a greater mean, and \<0 a lesser mean than the standard. Growth parameters were compared to a standard defined by CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 6 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented.

    Baseline up to Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in Height Z-score up to Month 9

    Z-Score was a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It described whether a mean was above or below the standard and how unusual the measurement is with range from -3 to +3; 0 =same mean, \>0 a greater mean, and \<0 a lesser mean than the standard. Growth parameters were compared to a standard defined by CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 9 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.

    Baseline up to Month 9

  • Change From Baseline in Height Z-score up to Month 12

    Z-Score was a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It described whether a mean was above or below the standard and how unusual the measurement is with range from -3 to +3; 0 =same mean, \>0 a greater mean, and \<0 a lesser mean than the standard. Growth parameters were compared to a standard defined by CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 12 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.

    Baseline up to Month 12

  • Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Z-score up to Month 6

    The BMD was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) for the posterior-anterior lumbar spine (L1\_L4) and total body less head area. The Z-Score is the number of standard deviations a participant's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values". Positive changes from baseline indicated an improvement in condition.

    Baseline up to Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in BMD Z-score up to Month 12

    The BMD was measured by DEXA for the posterior-anterior lumbar spine (L1\_L4) and total body less head area. The Z-Score is the number of standard deviations a participant's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values". Positive changes from baseline indicated an improvement in condition.

    Baseline up to Month 12

  • Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Content (BMC)-Z Score up to Month 6

    The BMC is an estimate of the amount of mineral (such as calcium) in the bone, which was assessed by DEXA scan for the posterior-anterior lumbar spine (L1\_L4) and total body less head area. Positive changes from baseline indicated an improvement in condition.

    Baseline up to Month 6

  • Change From Baseline in BMC-Z Score up to Month 12

    The BMC is an estimate of the amount of mineral (such as calcium) in the bone, which was assessed by DEXA scan for the posterior-anterior lumbar spine (L1\_L4) and total body less head area. Positive changes from baseline indicated an improvement in condition.

    Baseline up to Month 12

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

    Up to Day 390

  • Percentage of Participants With Kidney Stones

    Up to Day 390

Study Arms (2)

Topiramate

EXPERIMENTAL

Topiramate weight based dosing for participants 2 to less than (\<) 10 years of age not to exceed 350 mg/day (milligram per day), as tolerated; not to exceed 400 mg/day in participants 10-15 years of age, as tolerated.

Drug: Topiramate

Levetiracetam

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Levetiracetam weight based dosing for all participants 2-15 years of age, not to exceed 60 milligram per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day), as tolerated. The maximum recommended daily dosage is 3,000 milligram (mg).

Drug: Levetiracetam

Interventions

Topiramate weight based dosing for participants 2 to \<10 years of age not to exceed 350 mg/day, as tolerated; not to exceed 400 mg/day in participants 10-15 years of age, as tolerated.

Topiramate

Levetiracetam weight based dosing for all participants 2-15 years of age, not to exceed 60 mg/kg/day, as tolerated. The maximum recommended daily dosage is 3,000 mg.

Levetiracetam

Eligibility Criteria

Age2 Years - 15 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Participant with a clinical diagnosis of new-onset or recent-onset epilepsy characterized by partial-onset seizures (POS) (with or without secondary generalization) or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) in accordance with criteria of the International League Against Epilepsy. The epilepsy diagnosis must be within the previous 2 years before screening
  • Caregivers (parents or legally acceptable representatives) of the participant must be able to accurately maintain the participant take-home record and seizure diary
  • At screening, participant must have weight and height values within the 5th to 95th percentile for chronological age (based on standard Child Height and Weight Charts from the Centers for Disease Control \[CDC\])
  • Participant must never have been treated for epilepsy (treatment-naïve) or have been treated with no more than 1 standard antiepileptic drug (AED) if temporary or urgent AED use was necessary. Previous AED exposure must not exceed either of the following: 1.)Thirty-one days immediately preceding enrollment, or 2.)A total of 6 months of previous AED exposure in the past if the AED has been discontinued for at least 1 year prior to enrollment
  • Parents (or legally acceptable representatives) of the participant must sign an informed consent/permission document, indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to give permission for their child to participate in the study. Participant 7 years of age and older, capable of understanding the nature of the study, must provide assent for their participation

You may not qualify if:

  • Participant has a surgically implanted and functioning vagus nerve stimulator
  • Participant has a history of seizures as a result of a correctable medical condition, such as metabolic disturbance, toxic exposure, neoplasm, or active infection within 2 weeks prior to the first day of Screening
  • Participant has had uncontrolled seizures while previously taking either topiramate or levetiracetam
  • Participant has a history of non-epileptic seizures within 2 weeks prior to the first day of Screening
  • Participant has myoclonic or absence seizures

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (41)

Unknown Facility

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Los Angeles, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Gulf Breeze, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Orlando, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tampa, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wellington, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Portland, Oregon, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Temple, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Location

Unknown Facility

Córdoba, Argentina

Location

Unknown Facility

Queensland, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Graz, Austria

Location

Unknown Facility

Leuven, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Namur, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Brest, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Bron, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Paris, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Toulouse, France

Location

Unknown Facility

München, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Tübingen, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Balassagyarmat, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Budapest, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Debrecen, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Veszprém, Hungary

Location

Unknown Facility

Cebu, Philippines

Location

Unknown Facility

Manila, Philippines

Location

Unknown Facility

Krakow, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Poznan, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Warsaw, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Ulyanovsk, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Durban, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

Location

Unknown Facility

New Taipei City, Taiwan

Location

Unknown Facility

Taichung, Taiwan

Location

Unknown Facility

Taipei, Taiwan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Epilepsy

Interventions

TopiramateLevetiracetam

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

FructoseHexosesMonosaccharidesSugarsCarbohydratesKetosesAcetamidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAcetatesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsPyrrolidinonesPyrrolidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Limitations and Caveats

Due to futility of enrollment, the enrollment was stopped early; however, all enrolled participants completed the full course of the trial excluding 7 participants (reasons captured in "participant flow"). Also, there was no exposure to topiramate in 2 to 5 years age cohort. Therefore, no conclusions can be made with regard to this age group due to the absence of comparability.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Director - Clinical Leader
Organization
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Study Officials

  • Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

    Janssen Research & Development, LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2014

First Posted

July 28, 2014

Study Start

October 6, 2014

Primary Completion

April 30, 2020

Study Completion

April 30, 2020

Last Updated

April 29, 2025

Results First Posted

May 17, 2021

Record last verified: 2025-04

Locations