A Study to Investigate the Safety of the Drugs Topiramate and Levetiracetam in Treating Children Recently Diagnosed With Epilepsy
A Randomized, Active-Controlled, Open-Label, Flexible-Dose Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Topiramate as Monotherapy Compared With Levetiracetam as Monotherapy in Pediatric Subjects With New or Recent-Onset Epilepsy
3 other identifiers
interventional
63
13 countries
40
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of topiramate monotherapy compared with levetiracetam another standard antiepileptic drug (AED), as monotherapy for new-onset or recent-onset epilepsy (seizure disorder) on pediatric growth and maturation, bone mineralization, and kidney stone formation in children aged 2 to 15 years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Oct 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_3
40 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 6, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 17, 2021
CompletedApril 29, 2025
April 1, 2025
5.6 years
July 24, 2014
April 23, 2021
April 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (14)
Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score up to Month 1
The Z-Score indicates how many standard deviations (SD) a participant has from the population normal values. The body weight z-scores were designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that was expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. Body weight data were converted to Z-scores using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) programs provided by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for the calculation of the 2000 CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 1 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 1
Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score up to Month 3
The Z-Score indicates how many SD a participant has from the population normal values. The body weight z-scores were designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that was expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. Body weight data were converted to Z-scores using the SAS programs provided by the CDC for the calculation of the 2000 CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 3 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 3
Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score up to Month 6
The Z-Score indicates how many SD a participant has from the population normal values. The body weight z-scores were designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that was expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. Body weight data were converted to Z-scores using the SAS programs provided by the CDC for the calculation of the 2000 CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 6 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 6
Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score up to Month 9
The Z-Score indicates how many SD a participant has from the population normal values. The body weight z-scores were designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that was expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. Body weight data were converted to Z-scores using the SAS programs provided by the CDC for the calculation of the 2000 CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up yo Month 9 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 9
Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score up to Month 12
The Z-Score indicates how many SD a participant has from the population normal values. The body weight z-scores were designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that was expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. Body weight data were converted to Z-scores using the SAS programs provided by the CDC for the calculation of the 2000 CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline to Month 12 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 12
Change From Baseline in Height Z-score up to Month 1
Z-Score was a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It described whether a mean was above or below the standard and how unusual the measurement is with range from minus (-) 3 to plus (+) 3; 0 equal to (=) same mean, greater than (\>) 0 a greater mean, and less than (\<) 0 a lesser mean than the standard. Growth parameters were compared to a standard defined by CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 1 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 1
Change From Baseline in Height Z-score up to Month 3
Z-Score was a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It described whether a mean was above or below the standard and how unusual the measurement is with range from -3 to +3; 0 =same mean, \>0 a greater mean, and \<0 a lesser mean than the standard. Growth parameters were compared to a standard defined by CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 3 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 3
Change From Baseline in Height Z-score up to Month 6
Z-Score was a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It described whether a mean was above or below the standard and how unusual the measurement is with range from -3 to +3; 0 =same mean, \>0 a greater mean, and \<0 a lesser mean than the standard. Growth parameters were compared to a standard defined by CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 6 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented.
Baseline up to Month 6
Change From Baseline in Height Z-score up to Month 9
Z-Score was a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It described whether a mean was above or below the standard and how unusual the measurement is with range from -3 to +3; 0 =same mean, \>0 a greater mean, and \<0 a lesser mean than the standard. Growth parameters were compared to a standard defined by CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 9 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 9
Change From Baseline in Height Z-score up to Month 12
Z-Score was a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It described whether a mean was above or below the standard and how unusual the measurement is with range from -3 to +3; 0 =same mean, \>0 a greater mean, and \<0 a lesser mean than the standard. Growth parameters were compared to a standard defined by CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 12 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 12
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Z-score up to Month 6
The BMD was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) for the posterior-anterior lumbar spine (L1\_L4) and total body less head area. The Z-Score is the number of standard deviations a participant's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values". Positive changes from baseline indicated an improvement in condition.
Baseline up to Month 6
Change From Baseline in BMD Z-score up to Month 12
The BMD was measured by DEXA for the posterior-anterior lumbar spine (L1\_L4) and total body less head area. The Z-Score is the number of standard deviations a participant's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values". Positive changes from baseline indicated an improvement in condition.
Baseline up to Month 12
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Content (BMC)-Z Score up to Month 6
The BMC is an estimate of the amount of mineral (such as calcium) in the bone, which was assessed by DEXA scan for the posterior-anterior lumbar spine (L1\_L4) and total body less head area. Positive changes from baseline indicated an improvement in condition.
Baseline up to Month 6
Change From Baseline in BMC-Z Score up to Month 12
The BMC is an estimate of the amount of mineral (such as calcium) in the bone, which was assessed by DEXA scan for the posterior-anterior lumbar spine (L1\_L4) and total body less head area. Positive changes from baseline indicated an improvement in condition.
Baseline up to Month 12
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
Up to Day 390
Percentage of Participants With Kidney Stones
Up to Day 390
Study Arms (2)
Topiramate
EXPERIMENTALTopiramate weight based dosing for participants 2 to less than (\<) 10 years of age not to exceed 350 mg/day (milligram per day), as tolerated; not to exceed 400 mg/day in participants 10-15 years of age, as tolerated.
Levetiracetam
ACTIVE COMPARATORLevetiracetam weight based dosing for all participants 2-15 years of age, not to exceed 60 milligram per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day), as tolerated. The maximum recommended daily dosage is 3,000 milligram (mg).
Interventions
Topiramate weight based dosing for participants 2 to \<10 years of age not to exceed 350 mg/day, as tolerated; not to exceed 400 mg/day in participants 10-15 years of age, as tolerated.
Levetiracetam weight based dosing for all participants 2-15 years of age, not to exceed 60 mg/kg/day, as tolerated. The maximum recommended daily dosage is 3,000 mg.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participant with a clinical diagnosis of new-onset or recent-onset epilepsy characterized by partial-onset seizures (POS) (with or without secondary generalization) or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) in accordance with criteria of the International League Against Epilepsy. The epilepsy diagnosis must be within the previous 2 years before screening
- Caregivers (parents or legally acceptable representatives) of the participant must be able to accurately maintain the participant take-home record and seizure diary
- At screening, participant must have weight and height values within the 5th to 95th percentile for chronological age (based on standard Child Height and Weight Charts from the Centers for Disease Control \[CDC\])
- Participant must never have been treated for epilepsy (treatment-naïve) or have been treated with no more than 1 standard antiepileptic drug (AED) if temporary or urgent AED use was necessary. Previous AED exposure must not exceed either of the following: 1.)Thirty-one days immediately preceding enrollment, or 2.)A total of 6 months of previous AED exposure in the past if the AED has been discontinued for at least 1 year prior to enrollment
- Parents (or legally acceptable representatives) of the participant must sign an informed consent/permission document, indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to give permission for their child to participate in the study. Participant 7 years of age and older, capable of understanding the nature of the study, must provide assent for their participation
You may not qualify if:
- Participant has a surgically implanted and functioning vagus nerve stimulator
- Participant has a history of seizures as a result of a correctable medical condition, such as metabolic disturbance, toxic exposure, neoplasm, or active infection within 2 weeks prior to the first day of Screening
- Participant has had uncontrolled seizures while previously taking either topiramate or levetiracetam
- Participant has a history of non-epileptic seizures within 2 weeks prior to the first day of Screening
- Participant has myoclonic or absence seizures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (41)
Unknown Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Gulf Breeze, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Wellington, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Toledo, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Temple, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Córdoba, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Queensland, Australia
Unknown Facility
Graz, Austria
Unknown Facility
Leuven, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Namur, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Unknown Facility
Brest, France
Unknown Facility
Bron, France
Unknown Facility
Paris, France
Unknown Facility
Toulouse, France
Unknown Facility
München, Germany
Unknown Facility
Tübingen, Germany
Unknown Facility
Balassagyarmat, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Budapest, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Debrecen, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Veszprém, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Cebu, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Manila, Philippines
Unknown Facility
Krakow, Poland
Unknown Facility
Poznan, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Ulyanovsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Durban, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
New Taipei City, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taichung, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taipei, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Due to futility of enrollment, the enrollment was stopped early; however, all enrolled participants completed the full course of the trial excluding 7 participants (reasons captured in "participant flow"). Also, there was no exposure to topiramate in 2 to 5 years age cohort. Therefore, no conclusions can be made with regard to this age group due to the absence of comparability.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director - Clinical Leader
- Organization
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2014
First Posted
July 28, 2014
Study Start
October 6, 2014
Primary Completion
April 30, 2020
Study Completion
April 30, 2020
Last Updated
April 29, 2025
Results First Posted
May 17, 2021
Record last verified: 2025-04