NCT02188160

Brief Summary

The primary purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension compared to vehicle (placebo) in subjects who have a documented clinical diagnosis of dry eye disease. The product will be studied over 28 days, with 1-2 drops instilled in each eye four times daily (QID).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2014

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

11 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2014

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 9, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 11, 2014

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2015

Completed
5.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 6, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

January 6, 2021

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

July 9, 2014

Results QC Date

November 25, 2020

Last Update Submit

January 4, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

PainCorticosteroidDry EyeHyperemiaOcular Discomfort

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Bulbar Conjunctival Hyperemia

    Comparison of mean bulbar conjunctival hyperemia in the study eye between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-4 grading scale. The grading scale was based on the Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit Grading Scale where 0 = none, 1 = very slight, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.

    Visit 6 (Day 29)

  • Ocular Discomfort

    Comparison of mean ocular discomfort severity between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse.

    Visit 6 (Day 29)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Corneal Fluorescein Staining Scores

    Visit 4 (Day 15) and Visit 6 (Day 29)

  • Bulbar Conjunctival Hyperemia Scores

    Visit 4 (Day 15)

  • Ocular Discomfort

    Visit 4 (Day 15)

Study Arms (2)

KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension dosed QID for 28 days in subjects with dry eye disease

Drug: KPI-121

Vehicle

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Vehicle (placebo) dosed QID for 28 days in subjects with dry eye disease

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

KPI-121 drug product will be supplied as 0.25% as a suspension in identically packaged opaque dropper bottles. KPI-121 drug product is a sterile, aqueous, submicron suspension of loteprednol etabonate.

Also known as: KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension, Loteprednol etabonate
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension

Subjects randomized to placebo control arms will receive the same bottles containing all components at the concentrations used in the KPI-121 drug product with the exception of the active component, loteprednol etabonate.

Also known as: Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
Vehicle

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Have a documented clinical diagnosis of dry eye disease in both eyes

You may not qualify if:

  • Known hypersensitivity/contraindication to study product(s) or components.
  • History of glaucoma, IOP \>21 mmHg at the screening or randomization visits, or being treated for glaucoma in either eye.
  • Diagnosis of: ongoing ocular infection; severe/serious ocular condition that in judgment of Investigator could confound study assessments or limit compliance; severe/serious systemic disease or uncontrolled medical condition that in judgment of Investigator could confound study assessments or limit compliance; or have been exposed to an investigational drug within the 30 days prior to screening.
  • In the opinion of Investigator or study coordinator, be unwilling or unable to comply with study protocol or unable to successfully instill eye drops.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (11)

Sall Research Medical Center

Artesia, California, 90701, United States

Location

North Valley Eye Medical Group

Mission Hills, California, 91345, United States

Location

Martel Eye Medical Group

Rancho Cordova, California, 95670, United States

Location

Eye Center of Southern CT, P.C.

Hamden, Connecticut, 06518, United States

Location

Price Vision Group

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260, United States

Location

Ophthalmology Associates

St Louis, Missouri, 63131, United States

Location

Comprehensive Eye Care, Ltd. / Vision Research Institute, LLC

Washington, Missouri, 63090, United States

Location

South Shore Eye Center, LLP

Wantagh, New York, 11793, United States

Location

Abrams Eye Center

Cleveland, Ohio, 44115, United States

Location

Total Eye Care, PA

Memphis, Tennessee, 38119, United States

Location

Whitsett Vision Group

Houston, Texas, 77055, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Korenfeld M, Nichols KK, Goldberg D, Evans D, Sall K, Foulks G, Coultas S, Brazzell K. Safety of KPI-121 Ophthalmic Suspension 0.25% in Patients With Dry Eye Disease: A Pooled Analysis of 4 Multicenter, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Studies. Cornea. 2021 May 1;40(5):564-570. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002452.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye SyndromesKeratoconjunctivitis SiccaPainHyperemia

Interventions

Loteprednol Etabonate

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lacrimal Apparatus DiseasesEye DiseasesKeratoconjunctivitisConjunctivitisConjunctival DiseasesKeratitisCorneal DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AndrostadienesAndrostenesAndrostanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
VP, Clinical Development
Organization
Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Gregg Berdy, MD

    Ophthalmology Associates

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • David Evans, OD

    Total Eye Care, PA

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Kathy Kelley, OD

    Price Vision Group

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Joseph Martel, MD

    Martel Eye Medical Group

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mark Milner, MD

    Eye Center of Southern CT, P.C.

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Steven Rauchman, MD

    North Valley Eye Medical Group

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Kenneth Sall, MD

    Sall Research Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jeffrey Whitsett, MD

    Whitsett Vision Group

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Marc Abrams, MD

    Abrams Eye Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Michael Korenfeld, MD

    Ecomprehensive Eye Care, Ltd / Vision Research Institute LLC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jodi Luchs, MD

    South Shore Eye Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2014

First Posted

July 11, 2014

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion

January 1, 2015

Study Completion

March 1, 2015

Last Updated

January 6, 2021

Results First Posted

January 6, 2021

Record last verified: 2019-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations