NCT02617667

Brief Summary

The objective of this study was to compare the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of two different dose levels of CyclASol Ophthalmic Solutions to placebo (vehicle) and Restasis for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of Dry Eye Disease (DED).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
207

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2016

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 25, 2015

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 1, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2016

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2016

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 26, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

November 6, 2019

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

November 25, 2015

Results QC Date

May 17, 2018

Last Update Submit

October 23, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Total Corneal Fluorescein Staining at 113 Days

    The primary analysis and objective of the study was to compare the two CyclASol groups versus vehicle (all blinded treatment arms) for one sign and one symptom endpoint. The open label active comparator arm was not included in the primary analysis to reduce the number of comparisons. The sign endpoint was the change from baseline in total corneal fluorescein staining at day 113. The cornea is divided into five regions: central, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal. Each region is graded from 0-3 based on the National Eye Institute scale, where 0 indicates no staining and 3 maximal staining. The total score is the sum of all these regions. The maximum score for each eye is 15.

    Baseline to 113 Days

  • Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Dryness Severity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 113 Days

    The primary analysis and objective of the study was to compare the the two CyclASol groups versus vehicle (all blinded treatment arms) for one sign and one symptom endpoint. The open label active comparator arm was not included in the primary analysis to reduce the number of comparisons. Furthermore, the open label character could have had an impact on patient reported outcomes. The symptom endpoint was the change from baseline in severity of dryness VAS at Day 113. Dryness severity was rated from 0 to 100%, where 0% corresponds to "no dryness" and 100% corresponds to "maximum dryness".

    Baseline to 113 Days

Study Arms (4)

CyclASol Ophthalmic Solution 1

EXPERIMENTAL

Cyclosporine A solution (dose-level 1) in vehicle

Drug: Cyclosporine A

CyclASol Ophthalmic Solution 2

EXPERIMENTAL

Cyclosporine A solution (dose-level 2) in vehicle

Drug: Cyclosporine A

Placebo Ophthalmic Solution

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Vehicle only

Drug: Placebo

Restasis

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Cyclosporine A 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion

Drug: Cyclosporine A

Interventions

topical ocular, eye drops

Also known as: Ciclosporin, CsA
CyclASol Ophthalmic Solution 1CyclASol Ophthalmic Solution 2Restasis

topical ocular, eye drops

Also known as: Excipient
Placebo Ophthalmic Solution

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Signed Informed Consent Form and HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ) document
  • Patient-reported history of dry eye in both eyes
  • Current use of over-the-counter and/or prescription eye drops for dry eye symptoms
  • Ability and willingness to follow instructions, including participation in all study assessments and visits

You may not qualify if:

  • Women who are pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy
  • Unwillingness to submit a blood pregnancy test at screening and at the last visit (or early termination visit) if of childbearing potential, or unwillingness to use acceptable means of birth control
  • Clinically significant slit-lamp findings or abnormal lid anatomy at screening
  • DED secondary to scarring or ocular or periocular malignancy
  • History of herpetic keratitis
  • Active ocular allergies or ocular allergies that are expected to be active during the study period
  • Ongoing ocular or systemic infection at screening or baseline
  • Wear of contact lenses within 3 months prior to screening or anticipated use of contact lenses during the study
  • History of no response to previous topical Cyclosporine A and/or use of topical Cyclosporine A within 6 months prior to screening
  • Intra-ocular surgery or ocular laser surgery within the previous 6 months, or have any planned ocular and/or lid surgeries over the study period
  • Presence of an uncontrolled systemic disease
  • Presence of a known allergy and/or sensitivity to the study drug or its components

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

CYS-002 Investigational Site

Newport Beach, California, 92663, United States

Location

CYS-002 Investigational Site

Lewiston, Maine, 04240, United States

Location

CYS-002 Investigational Site

Andover, Massachusetts, 01810, United States

Location

CYS-002 Investigational Site

Quincy, Massachusetts, 02169, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Wirta DL, Torkildsen GL, Moreira HR, Lonsdale JD, Ciolino JB, Jentsch G, Beckert M, Ousler GW, Steven P, Krosser S. A Clinical Phase II Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Waterfree Cyclosporine Formulation for Treatment of Dry Eye Disease. Ophthalmology. 2019 Jun;126(6):792-800. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.01.024. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Syndromes

Interventions

CyclosporineExcipients

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lacrimal Apparatus DiseasesEye Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CyclosporinsPeptides, CyclicMacrocyclic CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsPharmaceutical VehiclesPharmaceutic AidsPharmaceutical PreparationsSpecialty Uses of ChemicalsChemical Actions and Uses

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr Sonja Krösser, VP Preclinical and Clinical Development
Organization
Novaliq GmbH

Study Officials

  • Sonja Kroesser, Dr.sc.hum.

    Novaliq GmbH

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2015

First Posted

December 1, 2015

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion

July 1, 2016

Study Completion

September 1, 2016

Last Updated

November 6, 2019

Results First Posted

July 26, 2018

Record last verified: 2019-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations