CyclASol for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Dry-eye Disease (DED)
A Phase 2, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-masked, Placebo (Vehicle)-Controlled Clinical Study With an Open Label Comparator Arm to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Topical CyclASol® for Treatment of Dry Eye Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
207
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The objective of this study was to compare the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of two different dose levels of CyclASol Ophthalmic Solutions to placebo (vehicle) and Restasis for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of Dry Eye Disease (DED).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jan 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 26, 2018
CompletedNovember 6, 2019
October 1, 2019
6 months
November 25, 2015
May 17, 2018
October 23, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Total Corneal Fluorescein Staining at 113 Days
The primary analysis and objective of the study was to compare the two CyclASol groups versus vehicle (all blinded treatment arms) for one sign and one symptom endpoint. The open label active comparator arm was not included in the primary analysis to reduce the number of comparisons. The sign endpoint was the change from baseline in total corneal fluorescein staining at day 113. The cornea is divided into five regions: central, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal. Each region is graded from 0-3 based on the National Eye Institute scale, where 0 indicates no staining and 3 maximal staining. The total score is the sum of all these regions. The maximum score for each eye is 15.
Baseline to 113 Days
Change From Baseline (Visit 1) in Dryness Severity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 113 Days
The primary analysis and objective of the study was to compare the the two CyclASol groups versus vehicle (all blinded treatment arms) for one sign and one symptom endpoint. The open label active comparator arm was not included in the primary analysis to reduce the number of comparisons. Furthermore, the open label character could have had an impact on patient reported outcomes. The symptom endpoint was the change from baseline in severity of dryness VAS at Day 113. Dryness severity was rated from 0 to 100%, where 0% corresponds to "no dryness" and 100% corresponds to "maximum dryness".
Baseline to 113 Days
Study Arms (4)
CyclASol Ophthalmic Solution 1
EXPERIMENTALCyclosporine A solution (dose-level 1) in vehicle
CyclASol Ophthalmic Solution 2
EXPERIMENTALCyclosporine A solution (dose-level 2) in vehicle
Placebo Ophthalmic Solution
PLACEBO COMPARATORVehicle only
Restasis
ACTIVE COMPARATORCyclosporine A 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion
Interventions
topical ocular, eye drops
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed Informed Consent Form and HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ) document
- Patient-reported history of dry eye in both eyes
- Current use of over-the-counter and/or prescription eye drops for dry eye symptoms
- Ability and willingness to follow instructions, including participation in all study assessments and visits
You may not qualify if:
- Women who are pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy
- Unwillingness to submit a blood pregnancy test at screening and at the last visit (or early termination visit) if of childbearing potential, or unwillingness to use acceptable means of birth control
- Clinically significant slit-lamp findings or abnormal lid anatomy at screening
- DED secondary to scarring or ocular or periocular malignancy
- History of herpetic keratitis
- Active ocular allergies or ocular allergies that are expected to be active during the study period
- Ongoing ocular or systemic infection at screening or baseline
- Wear of contact lenses within 3 months prior to screening or anticipated use of contact lenses during the study
- History of no response to previous topical Cyclosporine A and/or use of topical Cyclosporine A within 6 months prior to screening
- Intra-ocular surgery or ocular laser surgery within the previous 6 months, or have any planned ocular and/or lid surgeries over the study period
- Presence of an uncontrolled systemic disease
- Presence of a known allergy and/or sensitivity to the study drug or its components
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Novaliq GmbHlead
Study Sites (4)
CYS-002 Investigational Site
Newport Beach, California, 92663, United States
CYS-002 Investigational Site
Lewiston, Maine, 04240, United States
CYS-002 Investigational Site
Andover, Massachusetts, 01810, United States
CYS-002 Investigational Site
Quincy, Massachusetts, 02169, United States
Related Publications (1)
Wirta DL, Torkildsen GL, Moreira HR, Lonsdale JD, Ciolino JB, Jentsch G, Beckert M, Ousler GW, Steven P, Krosser S. A Clinical Phase II Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Waterfree Cyclosporine Formulation for Treatment of Dry Eye Disease. Ophthalmology. 2019 Jun;126(6):792-800. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.01.024. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
PMID: 30703441RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Sonja Krösser, VP Preclinical and Clinical Development
- Organization
- Novaliq GmbH
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sonja Kroesser, Dr.sc.hum.
Novaliq GmbH
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2015
First Posted
December 1, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 6, 2019
Results First Posted
July 26, 2018
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share