Safety and Efficacy of KPI-121 in Subjects With Inflammatory Meibomian Gland Disease
Maui
A Phase II, Double-Masked, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension on Signs and Symptoms of Inflammatory Meibomian Gland Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
206
1 country
8
Brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of KPI-121 ophthalmic suspension compared to vehicle (placebo) in subjects with signs and symptoms of inflammatory meibomian gland disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jul 2014
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 13, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 18, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 11, 2021
CompletedJanuary 11, 2021
January 1, 2021
1.4 years
August 13, 2014
November 25, 2020
January 6, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline in Ocular Discomfort
Comparison of change from baseline in ocular discomfort between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group using a 0-100 visual analog grading scale where 0 was better and 100 was worse at Visit 4 (Day 15).
Visit 2 (Day 1) to Visit 4 (Day 15)
Change From Baseline in Posterior Lid Margin Hyperemia in the Subgroup of Subjects With Greater Hyperemia at Baseline
Comparison of change from baseline in posterior lid margin hyperemia between the KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension group and the vehicle group in subjects with greater baseline hyperemia at Visit 4 (Day 15). The scale for posterior lid margin hyperemia was scored on a range from 0-4 with the following description: 0=normal 1. mild 2. moderate 3. severe 4. very severe
Visit 2 (Day 1) to Visit 4 (Day 15)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline in Ocular Discomfort
Visit 2 (Day 1) to Visit 6 (Day 29)
Change From Baseline in Posterior Lid Margin Hyperemia in the Subgroup of Subjects With Greater Hyperemia at Baseline
Visit 2 (Day 1) to Visit 6 (Day 29)
Change From Baseline in Posterior Lid Margin Hyperemia
Visit 2 (Day 1) to Visit 4 (Day 15)
Change From Baseline in Posterior Lid Margin Hyperemia
Visit 2 (Day 1) to Visit 6 (Day 29)
Study Arms (2)
Vehicle
PLACEBO COMPARATORVehicle (placebo) dosed QID for up to 30 days in subjects with inflammatory meibomian gland disease
KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension
ACTIVE COMPARATORKPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension dosed QID for up to 30 days in subjects with inflammatory meibomian gland disease
Interventions
KPI-121 drug product will be supplied in 0.25% strength as a suspension in opaque dropper bottles. KPI-121 drug product is a sterile, aqueous, submicron suspension of loteprednol etabonate. Subjects randomized to placebo control arm will receive the same bottles containing all components at the concentrations used in the KPI-121 drug product with the exception of the active component, loteprednol etabonate.
The vehicle control has the same composition as KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension except it does not contain loteprednol etabonate. The vehicle is essentially isotonic and is buffered to maintain pH 5.0 - 7.0. It is a sterile, aqueous solution supplied in the same white, low-density polyethylene plastic dropper bottle with the same white, controlled-drop polyethylene tip and white polypropylene closure as KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Have a documented clinical diagnosis of inflammatory meibomian gland disease in both eyes.
You may not qualify if:
- Known hypersensitivity/contraindication to study product(s) or components.
- Be currently receiving treatment for glaucoma, have history of or current glaucoma, or an IOP (intraocular pressure) over 21mmHg at Visit 1 (Screening) or Visit 2 (Randomization).
- Be unwilling to discontinue warm compress therapy, lid expression, or lid massage 14 days prior to Day 1 and for the duration of the study.
- Diagnosis of: ongoing ocular infection; severe/serious ocular condition that in judgment of Investigator could confound study assessments or limit compliance; severe/serious systemic disease or uncontrolled medical condition that in judgment of Investigator could confound study assessments or limit compliance; or have been exposed to an investigational drug within the 30 days prior to screening.
- Have had ocular surgery in the past 90 days or require ocular surgery during the study.
- In the opinion of Investigator or study coordinator, be unwilling or unable to comply with study protocol or unable to successfully instill eye drops.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
UAB School of Optometry
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-0010, United States
Sall Research Medical Center
Artesia, California, 90701, United States
North Valley Eye Medical Group
Mission Hills, California, 91345, United States
Wolstan & Goldberg Eye Associates
Torrance, California, 90505, United States
Tauber Eye Center
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111, United States
South Shore Eye Center, LLP
Wantagh, New York, 11793, United States
Abrams Eye Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44115, United States
Virginia Eye Consultants
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- VP, Clinical Development
- Organization
- Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marc Abrams, MD
Abrams Eye Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Damien Goldberg, MD
Wolstan & Goldberg Eye Associates
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jodi Luchs, MD
South Shore Eye Center, LLP
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kelly Nichols, OD, PhD
UAB School of Optometry
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven Rauchman, MD
North Valley Eye Medical Group
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kenneth Sall, MD
Sall Research Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Sheppard, MD
Virginia Eye Consultants
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joseph Tauber, MD
Tauber Eye Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 13, 2014
First Posted
August 18, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
January 11, 2021
Results First Posted
January 11, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01