Intracutaneous Versus Transcutaneous Sutures in the Face (IC vs TC Sutures)
Randomized Controlled Trial for the Cosmetic Result of Intracutaneous Versus Transcutaneous Sutures After Dermatologic Surgery in the Face
1 other identifier
interventional
142
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Rationale: Skin cancer is common in Caucasians and often exists on sun-exposed areas, such as the face. Treatment of choice is mostly excision and result in an irreversible scar. As the incidence of skin cancer is rising, also among young people, it is important to obtain a good cosmetic outcome after treatment. It is believed that the type of closure of the wound after excision can influence the cosmetic result. Currently, primary closure of the excision can occur by transcutaneous (TC) or intracutaneous (IC) suturing. Both techniques are widely used among dermatologists and plastic surgeons and the choice is mainly dependent on the preference of the physician. Research comparing the cosmetic result of both techniques in the craniofacial area is lacking. Objective: Evaluation of the cosmetic result of transcutaneous sutures versus intracutaneous sutures in the craniofacial area. Study design: A randomized controlled single-blinded multi-center trial. Study population: Patients older than 18 years, with craniofacial skin tumor receiving surgery followed by primary closure at the department of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery of the Maastricht University Medical Centre, the department of Dermatology of Catharina hospital Eindhoven and the department of Plastic surgery of Orbis Medical Centre Sittard. Intervention: Excision of the tumor followed by IC sutures or TC sutures Main study endpoints: Cosmetic result measured on the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) by the patient and the researcher 12 months after surgery. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: All patients who participate have an indication for excision and will be assigned to one of the suture techniques. Both techniques are widely used in the regular patient care. Therefore, no extra risks are associated with it. Patients will be asked to visit the hospital 3 months and 1 year following treatment, at which point a questionnaire will be filled in and the redness of the scar will be measured by means of non-invasive techniques. In addition, patients will be asked to apply a sunscreen on the scar daily during the first three months of follow-up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 15, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2016
CompletedJanuary 23, 2017
April 1, 2015
2 years
January 15, 2014
January 20, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The study aims to evaluate the cosmetic outcome 12 months post-treatment of IC compared to TC sutures after excision of a skin tumor in the face. Cosmetic result after surgery in the face
The study aims to evaluate the cosmetic outcome 12 months post-treatment of IC compared to TC sutures after excision of a skin tumor in the face.
after 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Transcutaneous sutures
OTHERTranscutaneous sutures
Intracutaneous sutures
OTHERIntracutaneous sutures
Interventions
Conventional excision followed by subcutaneous sutrues and transcutaneous sutures
Conventional excision followed by subcutaneous sutrues and intracutaneous sutures
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients aged 18 years or older with a skin tumour of minimal 5mm in diameter in the craniofacial area requiring an excision followed by primary closure will be included. If a patient has more than one lesion, the largest lesion that can be closed primarily will be included as a maximum of one tumour per patient will be studied.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with skin lesions on the ears, nose, mucosal part of the lips or eyelids as patients suited for excision but where a transplantation, flap or secondary granulation is necessary for reconstruction of the defect will be excluded. Patients not capable of informed consent will also be excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Maastricht University Hospital
Maastricht, Limburg, 6229HX, Netherlands
Orbis Medical Center
Sittard, Limburg, Netherlands
Catharina Hospital
Eindhoven, North Brabant, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xiaomeng Liu, drs.
Maastricht University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 15, 2014
First Posted
April 29, 2014
Study Start
April 1, 2014
Primary Completion
April 1, 2016
Study Completion
April 1, 2016
Last Updated
January 23, 2017
Record last verified: 2015-04