The Clinical Efficacy of Supraglottic Airway Device, Self-pressurized Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (ILA -SP) in Adult Patients: Comparison With Classic-laryngeal Airway (c-LMA)
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) are well established in anesthetic practice. Among these devices ,classic laryngeal airway has been typically widely used. The self-pressurised air-Q (air-Q) is newly developed supraglottic airway devices. It is a new single-use device that may optimise the airway sealing while reducing the potential for postoperative complications such as sore throat. The overall structure of the air-Q SP is identical to the original air-Q, except with regard to the inflatable cuff. The aim of this randomized trial was to compare the clinical performance of the classic LMA and the air-Q SP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable surgery
Started Jul 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable surgery
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2015
CompletedJanuary 11, 2019
October 1, 2016
8 months
July 28, 2014
January 10, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
airway leak pressure measured after device insertion
Airway leak pressure was determined by adjusting the expiratory valve of the breathing circle to 40 cmH2O (fixed fresh gas flow 3 L/min) and recording the pressure when equilibrium was reached.
within 5min to 10 min insertion of each device
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Insertion time
During and 1 min after insertion of each device
Other Outcomes (1)
Ease of insertion
During and 1 min after insertion of each device
Study Arms (2)
1)C-LMA group
EXPERIMENTAL2)Air-Q group
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
After induction of general anesthesia, C-LMA or Air-Q was inserted according to randomly allocated group.
After induction of general anesthesia, C-LMA or Air-Q was inserted according to randomly allocated group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients (20-75 of age) scheduled for elective surgery of short duration (less than 2 hr) undergoing general anesthesia using supraglottic airway
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a potentially difficult airway, risk of aspiration such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, or active upper respiratory tract infection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Human research Protection Center, Gangnam Severance Hospital,
Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Ha SH, Kim MS, Suh J, Lee JS. Self-pressurized air-Q(R) intubating laryngeal airway versus the LMA(R) Classic: a randomized clinical trial. Can J Anaesth. 2018 May;65(5):543-550. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1082-6. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
PMID: 29524199DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2014
First Posted
August 1, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
March 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 11, 2019
Record last verified: 2016-10