Effectiveness and Costs of a Digital Versus Face-to-face Preoperative Assessment Clinic
1 other identifier
interventional
252
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A digital preoperative assessment clinic provides a solution for the increasing demand and declining performance on waiting times for surgery, while conducting assessments to a high standard. However, it remains unclear if a digital preoperative assessment is as effective as a face-to-face clinic in terms of patient health outcomes and experience compared. This study aimed to compare quality or recovery and overall patient experience in patients undergoing a digital preoperative assessment versus regular face-to-face consultations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable surgery
Started Mar 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2022
CompletedSeptember 10, 2022
September 1, 2022
1.3 years
September 5, 2022
September 8, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of recovery 40 (QOR-40) scale
The QoR-40 is a validated composite endpoint that can be used to evaluate anesthetic or surgical procedure. The questionnaire consists of 40 questions on a 5-point Likert scale that provides a global score and sub scores across five dimensions: patient support, comfort, emotions, physical independence, and pain. The highest achievable score, indicating maximum quality of recovery, is 200. The lowest score, indicating worst quality of recovery, is 40. The questions are related to the quality of recovery over the past 24 hours.
Measured 48 hours postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (9)
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) form Y1
Measured at 24 hours preoperative
Decisional conflict scale (DCS)
Measured at 24 hours preoperative
Patient satisfaction with the information
Measured at 24 hours preoperative
Patient satisfaction with the entire screening process
Measured at 24 hours preoperative
ASA score reliability
During the PAC and just before surgery (1-2 hours)
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Face-to-face preoperative assessment group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe face-to-face screening consist of two 20-minute consecutive consultations with a nurse and subsequently an anesthesiologist or PA. The nurse obtains basic patient health information, provides information on the upcoming hospital admission, and gives advice in lifestyle procedures around the surgery. The physician assesses the patient's health status based on co-morbidities, medication use, previous surgery, and lifestyle habits to predict preoperative risks and determine the optimal anesthetic technique. Additional diagnostics, such as blood tests or electrocardiogram, can be ordered and optional anesthetic techniques will subsequently be presented and discussed with the patient, after which informed consent will be obtained.
Digital preoperative assessment group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in the digital preoperative assessment group are asked to complete an electronic screening questionnaire through the digital patient portal of the hospital. The questionnaire was designed by the anesthetic department physicians and consisted of 50 health related questions. Through the same digital patient portal, patients have access to animated instructional videos that provides information on anesthetic techniques, preoperative lifestyle advises and procedures around the upcoming surgery. The videos can be reviewed at any desired moment in time. A telephone appointment is scheduled solemnly to decide on the anesthesia technique and obtain informed consent since this process was technically not available in the electronic portal. Physicians were thoroughly instructed not to provide more information or answer questions. Patients are instructed to complete the electronic screening questionnaire and assess the animated videos before the scheduled appointment with the physician.
Interventions
a digital preoperative assessment for patient requiring surgery
a face-to-face preoperative assessment for patient requiring surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients to the PAC department with a request of undergoing surgery
- and older
- ASA classification I to IV
- general surgery (vascular, traumatic, gastrointestinal, oncological), gynecology, otolaryngology, neurosurgery, plastic surgery, orthopedics, and ophthalmology.
- fluent in Dutch
- the availability of an online personal computer at home
- and able to give informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- pregnant women
- patients undergoing a non-standard pre-operative assessment procedure which included breast- and gastrointestinal oncology and cardiac procedures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Diakonessenhuis
Utrecht, 3582 KE, Netherlands
Related Publications (7)
van den Blink A, Janssen LMJ, Hermanides J, Loer SA, Straat FK, Jessurun EN, Schwarte LA, Schober P. Evaluation of electronic screening in the preoperative process. J Clin Anesth. 2022 Nov;82:110941. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110941. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
PMID: 35939972BACKGROUNDMilne-Ives M, Leyden J, Maramba I, Chatterjee A, Meinert E. The Potential Impacts of a Digital Preoperative Assessment Service on Appointments, Travel-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions, and User Experience: Case Study. JMIR Perioper Med. 2022 Feb 16;5(1):e28612. doi: 10.2196/28612.
PMID: 35171104RESULTBlanco Vargas D, Faura Messa A, Izquierdo Tugas E, Santa-Olalla Bergua M, Noguera Sopena MM, Manoso Noriego M. [Online versus non-standard face to face preoperative assessment: cost effectiveness]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Aug-Sep;59(7):350-6. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.05.039. Epub 2012 Jul 10. Spanish.
PMID: 22784647RESULTHowell M, Hood AJ, Jayne DG. Use of a patient completed iPad questionnaire to improve pre-operative assessment. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Feb;31(1):221-225. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9818-0. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
PMID: 26715416RESULTTaylor SK, Andrzejowski JC, Wiles MD, Bland S, Jones GL, Radley SC. A prospective observational study of the impact of an electronic questionnaire (ePAQ-PO) on the duration of nurse-led pre-operative assessment and patient satisfaction. PLoS One. 2018 Oct 19;13(10):e0205439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205439. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30339687RESULTOsman T, Lew E, Lum EP, van Galen L, Dabas R, Sng BL, Car J. PreAnaesThesia computerized health (PATCH) assessment: development and validation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Nov 14;20(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01202-8.
PMID: 33189131RESULTvan Hoorn BT, Tromp DJ, van Rees RCM, van Rossenberg LX, Cazemier HK, van Heijl M, Tromp Meesters RC. Effectiveness of a digital vs face-to-face preoperative assessment: A randomized, noninferiority clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2023 Nov;90:111192. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111192. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
PMID: 37467628DERIVED
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Reinier Tromp Meesters, Msc
Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht
- STUDY CHAIR
Mark van Heijl, PhD
Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2022
First Posted
September 10, 2022
Study Start
March 1, 2021
Primary Completion
July 1, 2022
Study Completion
September 5, 2022
Last Updated
September 10, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share