NCT02192606

Brief Summary

The objective aim is to evaluate whether the use of 3D laparoscopy facilitates the vaginal cuff closure of the vaginal cuff during a total laparoscopic hysterectomy among novice laparoscopists (PGY 2-4, Fellow). This is a randomized single blinded controlled trial comparing the difference in 2D vs. 3D in regards to vaginal cuff closure time stratified by residents and fellows. Patients will undergo a total laparoscopic hysterectomy and will be randomized to either 2D versus 3D.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
57

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2013

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2013

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 5, 2013

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 17, 2014

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2016

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 6, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

January 24, 2018

Status Verified

January 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

November 5, 2013

Results QC Date

July 11, 2017

Last Update Submit

January 18, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Laparoscopy3D Visual SystemTotal Hysterectomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Vaginal Cuff Closure Times

    The primary endpoint is the vaginal cuff closure time at the time of a total laparoscopic hysterectomy. As the 2D laparoscopy system is standard during laparoscopic cases, our objective is to assess if there is a difference in vaginal cuff closure time when a 3D laparoscopy system is used instead. At time of the surgery, that patient will be randomized to either system. A resident or fellow will close the vaginal cuff and time to close the vaginal cuff will be recorded.

    Start of vaginal cuff closure to end of vaginal cuff closure

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Estimated Blood Loss at the Time of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

    Time of Procedure End

Study Arms (2)

2D Laparoscopy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The standard 2D Laparoscopy System to be used at time of the total laparoscopic hysterectomy

Device: 2D Laparoscopy

3D laparoscopy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Storz 3D Laparoscopy System is the intervention we are studying at the time of the total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Device: Storz 3D Laparoscopy System

Interventions

The Storz 3D Laparoscopy System is a new device that allows for laparoscopic surgeons to utilize 3D imaging during surgery with a fraction of the cost of the da Vinci Surgical System, a three-dimensional visual system.

3D laparoscopy

The standard 2D Laparoscopy System to be used at time of the total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

2D Laparoscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women with benign conditions such as uterine fibroids, menorrhagia, adenomyosis, pelvic pain, abnormal uterine bleeding

You may not qualify if:

  • None

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Brigham & Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

Location

Odense University Hospital

Odense, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Bhayani SB, Andriole GL. Three-Dimensional (3D) Vision: Does It Improve Laparoscopic Skills? An Assessment of a 3D Head-Mounted Visualization System. Rev Urol. 2005 Fall;7(4):211-4.

    PMID: 16985832BACKGROUND
  • Tanagho YS, Andriole GL, Paradis AG, Madison KM, Sandhu GS, Varela JE, Benway BM. 2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Nov;22(9):865-70. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0220. Epub 2012 Oct 16.

    PMID: 23072406BACKGROUND
  • Einarsson JI, Wang KC, Cohen SL, Sandberg EM, Vree FEM, Jonsdottir GM, Gobern J, Brown DN. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Barbed versus Traditional Suture for Vaginal Cuff Closure at Time of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Preliminary Results. Abstracts/ Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 19 (2012); S36-70.

    BACKGROUND
  • Ajao MO, Larsen CR, Manoucheri E, Goggins ER, Rask MT, Cox MKB, Mushinski A, Gu X, Cohen SL, Rudnicki M, Einarsson JI. Two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for vaginal cuff closure by surgeons-in-training: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1237-1243. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06886-9. Epub 2019 Jun 6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

LeiomyomaMetrorrhagiaPelvic PainAdenomyosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms, Muscle TissueNeoplasms, Connective and Soft TissueNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsUterine HemorrhageUterine DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital DiseasesHemorrhagePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jon I. Einarsson
Organization
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Study Officials

  • Jon Einarsson, MD, PhD, MPH

    Brigham and Women's Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Sarah L Cohen, MD, MPH

    Brigham and Women's Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Division Chair, Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2013

First Posted

July 17, 2014

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion

August 1, 2016

Study Completion

September 1, 2016

Last Updated

January 24, 2018

Results First Posted

October 6, 2017

Record last verified: 2018-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations