Imiquimod, Fluorouracil, or Observation in Treating HIV-Positive Patients With High-Grade Anal Squamous Skin Lesions
A Randomized, Phase III Study of Intra-anal Imiquimod 2.5% vs. Topical 5-fluorouracil 5% vs. Observation for the Treatment of High-grade Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in HIV-infected Men and Women
3 other identifiers
interventional
91
2 countries
13
Brief Summary
This randomized phase III trial studies imiquimod or fluorouracil to see how well they work compared to observation in treating patients with high-grade anal squamous skin lesions who are human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive. Biological therapies, such as imiquimod, may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop tumor cells from growing. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as fluorouracil, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known whether imiquimod or fluorouracil is more effective than observation in treating high-grade anal squamous skin lesions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Dec 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_3
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 28, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 5, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 2, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 20, 2025
CompletedJuly 23, 2025
July 1, 2025
7.9 years
February 7, 2014
March 19, 2025
July 11, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Response in 5-FU Arm and Observation Arm Using ITT Population
Complete response is defined as the absence of HSIL histology for all biopsies and the absence of HSIL cytology. The percentage of participants achieving complete response in the 5-FU and observation arms will be reported and compared across sites, along with the corresponding p-value, using stratified Mantel-Haenszel-Cochran tests at a one-sided alpha level of 0.025.
At week 20
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Response (5-FU vs Observation ) Using Per Protocol Population
Complete response is defined as the absence of HSIL histology for all biopsies and the absence of HSIL cytology. The percentage of participants achieving complete response in the 5-FU and observation arms will be reported, along with the corresponding p-value, using stratified Mantel-Haenszel-Cochran tests to compare results across sites at a one-sided alpha level of 0.025.
At week 20
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Response in 5-FU vs. Imiquimod, Using the ITT Population Restricted to Those Randomized to Either Treatment Prior to the Closure of the Imiquimod Arm.
Complete response is defined as an absence of HSIL histology for all biopsies and the absence of HSIL cytology. Compare the percentage of complete response in 5-FU vs Imiquimod arms across sites using stratified CMH test at one-sided 0.05 alpha.
Week 20
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Response in 5-FU vs. Imiquimod, Using the PP Population Restricted to Those Randomized to Either Treatment Prior to the Closure of the Imiquimod Arm.
Complete response is defined as the absence of HSIL histology for all biopsies and the absence of HSIL cytology. Compare the complete response by 5-FU vs Imiquimod across sites using stratified CMH test at one-sided 0.05 alpha using only the participants randomized to imiquimod and 5-FU prior to closure of the imiquimod arm.
Week 20
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Response in Imiquimod vs Observation Arm, Using ITT Population Restricted to Those Randomized to Either Treatment Prior to the Closure of the Imiquimod Arm.
Complete response is defined as the absence of HSIL histology for all biopsies and the absence of HSIL cytology. Compare the complete response by Observation vs Imiquimod across sites using stratified CMH test at two-sided 0.05 alpha using only the participants randomized to imiquimod and observation prior to closure of the imiquimod arm.
Week 20
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Response in Imiquimod vs Observation Arm, Using Per Protocol Population Restricted to Those Randomized to Either Treatment Prior to the Closure of the Imiquimod Arm.
Complete response is defined as the absence of HSIL histology for all biopsies and the absence of HSIL cytology. Compare the complete response by Observation vs Imiquimod across sites using stratified CMH test at two-sided 0.05 alpha using only the participants randomized to imiquimod and observation prior to closure of the imiquimod arm.
Week 20
Number of Participants With Peri-anal HSIL Confirmed by Histology Across All Study Arms
Perianal HSIL are HSIL lesions detected in peri-anal region; These lesions will be detected by visual inspection using high resolution anoscopy and biopsy. Number of participants with presence of peri-anal HSIL on histology
At week 20
Number of Participants With Intra-anal HSIL
Intra-anal HSIL lesions are those lesions that are detected in intra-anal region. It will be detected using visual inspection using HRA followed by positive identification of HSIL using biopsy or cytology. Presence of intra-anal HSIL lesions will be descriptively reported across the three arms
At week 20
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event of Grade 1 to 5 by Week 44, Irrespective of Relatedness to the Intervention. AEs Were Stratified According to Those Reported at or Before Week 20 and After Week 20.
Up to week 44
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete or Partial Response in 5-FU vs Observation Using ITT Population
Up to week 20
Percentageof Patients Achieving Complete or Partial Response in Imiquimod vs Observation Arm, Using ITT Population Restricted to Those Randomized to Either Treatment Prior to the Closure of the Imiquimod Arm.
Up to week 20
Amount of Drug Consumed in 5-FU and Imiquimod Arm by Week 16
Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete or Partial Response in 5-FU vs Observation Using ITT Population
At 44 weeks
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Arm A (imiquimod)
EXPERIMENTALPatients apply imiquimod intra-anally QD for 16 weeks.
Arm B (fluorouracil)
EXPERIMENTALPatients apply fluorouracil intra-anally BID on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Arm C (observation)
NO INTERVENTIONPatients receive no treatment. Patients who still have HSIL at week 20 and who agree to randomization may cross-over to Arm A or B.
Interventions
Given intra-anally
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- HIV-positive; documentation of HIV infection must be based on a federally approved, licensed HIV test performed in conjunction with screening (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay \[ELISA\], western blot, or other test); alternatively, this documentation may include a record that another physician has documented that the patient has HIV based on prior ELISA and western blot; an approved antibody test will be used to confirm diagnosis; if the physician is treating a patient with combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) with a history of HIV positivity based on an approved antibody test then repeat antibody confirmation is not necessary
- Biopsy-proven HSIL (anal intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (AIN2) and/or AIN3) of the anal canal at either the squamocolumnar junction or distal anus, documented within 60 days prior to enrollment, but not less than 1 week prior to enrollment
- HSIL occupies at least 25% of the circumference of the anal canal at either the squamocolumnar junction or distal anus on high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) at screening or entry based on available biopsy results and visual appearance
- Anal HSIL lesions are visible at study entry and no lesions are suspicious for invasive cancer
- Ability to understand and willing to provide informed consent
- Participants must, in the opinion of the Investigator, be capable of complying with the requirements of this protocol including self-administration of study treatment
- Karnofsky performance status of \>= 70%
- Cluster of differentiation (CD)4 count \>= 200 within 120 days prior to enrollment or plasma HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) \< 200 copies/mL within 120 days prior to enrollment
- For females, cervical cytology (if having a cervix) and gynecologic evaluation within 12 months prior to enrollment
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \> 750 cells/mm\^3 within 90 days prior to enrollment
- Hemoglobin \>= 9.0 g/dL within 90 days prior to enrollment
- Platelet count \>= 75,000/mm\^3 within 90 days prior to enrollment
You may not qualify if:
- History of anal cancer
- Prior intra-anal use of topical 5-fluorouracil 5% or imiquimod 2.5%, 3.75% or 5% at any point, or use of perianal imiquimod 2.5%, 3.75% or 5% or topical 5-fluorouracil 5% within 6 months prior to enrollment
- Extensive concurrent perianal or lower vulvar HSIL or condyloma requiring a different treatment modality than the study treatment, or treatment that cannot be deferred in observation arm, per examining provider
- Condyloma occupying more than 50% of the circumference of the anal canal or that obscures a satisfactory exam
- Ongoing use of anticoagulant therapy other than aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
- Acute treatment for an infection (excluding fungal infection of the skin and sexually transmitted infections) or other serious medical illness within 14 days prior to study entry
- Concurrent systemic corticosteroids, cytokines, and immunomodulatory therapy (e.g. interferons)
- Prior history of HPV vaccination
- Treatment for anal or perianal HSIL, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) or condyloma within 4 months of entry; please note that infrared coagulation (IRC) or electrocautery of a biopsy site to stop bleeding does not constitute treatment
- Female participants who are pregnant or breastfeeding; women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test within 72 hours prior to initiating study treatment; all women of childbearing potential must be willing to comply with an acceptable birth control regimen to prevent pregnancy while receiving treatment and for 3 months after treatment is discontinued as determined by the Investigator; post-menopausal women must be amenorrheic for at least 12 months to be considered of non-childbearing potential; (note: a woman of childbearing potential is one who is biologically capable of becoming pregnant; this includes women who are using contraceptives or whose sexual partners are either sterile or using contraceptives)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AIDS Malignancy Consortiumlead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
- The Emmes Company, LLCcollaborator
- University of Arkansascollaborator
Study Sites (13)
UCLA CARE Center
Los Angeles, California, 90035, United States
UCSF-Mount Zion
San Francisco, California, 94115, United States
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303, United States
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center - New Orleans
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118, United States
Laser Surgery Care
New York, New York, 10011, United States
Cornell Clinical Trials Unit, New York Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 10065, United States
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
New York, New York, 10065, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10461, United States
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98101, United States
University of Puerto Rico
San Juan, 00936-3027, Puerto Rico
Related Publications (1)
Pedersen TB, Pachler FR, Rosenberg J, Andresen K. Interventions for anal canal intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 13;8(8):CD009244. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009244.pub3.
PMID: 40801169DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Himanshu Joshi, MBBS, MPH, PhD (Assistant Professor)
- Organization
- AMC Statistical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Timothy Wilkin
AIDS Associated Malignancies Clinical Trials Consortium
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2014
First Posted
February 11, 2014
Study Start
December 28, 2015
Primary Completion
December 5, 2023
Study Completion
May 2, 2024
Last Updated
July 23, 2025
Results First Posted
May 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07