Does Cricoid Pressure Reduce the Risk of Aspiration?
1 other identifier
interventional
95
1 country
2
Brief Summary
In modern anesthesia practice, the application of cricoid pressure during intubation is not infrequently used with the goal of preventing gastric-to-pulmonary aspiration. The evidence to support this practice is very scarce, and there have recently been many reports in the literature questioning the safety of cricoid pressure during intubation. Therefore, the goal of this study will be to randomize those at risk for microaspiration to receive cricoid pressure versus no cricoid pressure during intubation. We will specifically exclude those patients thought to be at the highest risk of aspiration (it is considered standard of care to perform cricoid pressure during intubation of this population). We will include those patients with some risk factors for aspiration (it is not considered standard of care to apply cricoid pressure during intubation of this population).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2014
CompletedJanuary 1, 2016
December 1, 2015
2 months
January 26, 2014
December 30, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of microaspiration
Tracheal secretions will be collected and later analyzed for the presence of pepsin A.
Within 15 minutes of intubation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Rate of ARDS
Within 7 days of intubation
Other Outcomes (1)
Rate of hospital acquired pneumonia
Within 7 days of intubation
Study Arms (2)
Cricoid pressure
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to receive cricoid pressure during endotracheal intubation.
No cricoid pressure
NO INTERVENTIONPatients randomized to receive no cricoid pressure during endotracheal intubation.
Interventions
Firm pressure on the cricoid cartilage with the goal of occluding the esophagus during endotracheal intubation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Obesity (BMI\>30)
- Diabetes mellitus
- Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
- schedule cardiac, aortic vascular or non-cardiac thoracic procedure
You may not qualify if:
- emergent surgery
- risk factors for macroaspiration (non-fasting status, bowel obstruction, achalasia, hiatal hernia, esophageal stricture, esophageal diverticulum), altered level of consciousness, known pregnancy
- preoperative ARDS
- preoperative pneumonia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
- Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Childrencollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Mayo Clinic - Saint Mary's Campus
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Bohman, MD
Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Instructor of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2014
First Posted
February 7, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
October 1, 2014
Last Updated
January 1, 2016
Record last verified: 2015-12