Effect of Paratracheal Esophagus Pressure on the Insertion of Laryngeal Mask Airway
Effect of Pressure to Left Paratracheal Esophagus During the Insertion of Laryngeal Mask Airway
1 other identifier
interventional
108
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Laryngeal mask airway is inserted into the oral cavity and seals the upper esophagus and the surrounding tissue, effectively securing airway. Laryngeal mask airway has been widely adopted in the clinical practice. On the other hand, cricoid pressure has been used to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents during induction of general anesthesia. However, cricoid pressure might impede placement of the laryngeal mask airway, thereby preventing effective ventilation. Recently, left paratracheal pressure was introduced as an alternative to cricoid pressure and reported to be more effective than cricoid pressure in the prevention of gastric air insufflation during positive-pressure ventilation by facemask. Since this method compresses low left paratracheal level, it may affect the successful insertion of laryngeal mask airway. In this study, the investigators aimed to evaluate the effect of paratracheal esophagus pressure on the insertion of laryngeal mask airway compare to conventional cricoid pressure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 2, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 17, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 17, 2020
CompletedJanuary 13, 2021
January 1, 2021
7 months
September 25, 2019
January 11, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The success rate of device insertion
Successful insertion of laryngeal mask airway in a maximum of three attempts
During induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 seconds
Secondary Outcomes (9)
The grade of fiberoptic bronchoscopic view
During induction of anesthesia, an average of 5 minutes
The time for successful insertion of the device
: During induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 seconds
Peak inspiratory pressure
At 5 minute after insertion of laryngeal mask airway
The ease of insertion of device
During induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 seconds
The number of attempts at insertion of device
During induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 seconds
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
PP group
EXPERIMENTALDuring the induction of anesthesia, left paratracheal pressure is applied by 30N force with thumb after confirmation of the location of the esophagus using ultrasound.
CP group
ACTIVE COMPARATORDuring the induction of anesthesia, cricoid pressure is applied by 30N force with three finger.
Interventions
To apply paratracheal pressure, the thumb was placed over the left side of the trachea cephalad to the clavicle and medial to the sternocleidomastoid muscle.
To apply cricoid pressure, the cricoid cartilage is compressed by 30N force with a single-handed three finger maneuvre towards the vertebral bodies.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who are undergoing surgery under general anesthesia where supraglottic airway management will be appropriate
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification 1-2
You may not qualify if:
- Body mass index \> 35 kg/m2
- High risk of regurgitation (hiatus hernia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, non-fasting status)
- Criteria for difficult airway (limitation of mouth opening/neck extension, Mallampati class IV),
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ajou university hospital
Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16499, South Korea
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The group assignments were sealed in opaque envelopes by a research assistant not involved in the study.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2019
First Posted
September 27, 2019
Study Start
January 2, 2020
Primary Completion
July 17, 2020
Study Completion
July 17, 2020
Last Updated
January 13, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share