NCT04106635

Brief Summary

Laryngeal mask airway is inserted into the oral cavity and seals the upper esophagus and the surrounding tissue, effectively securing airway. Laryngeal mask airway has been widely adopted in the clinical practice. On the other hand, cricoid pressure has been used to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents during induction of general anesthesia. However, cricoid pressure might impede placement of the laryngeal mask airway, thereby preventing effective ventilation. Recently, left paratracheal pressure was introduced as an alternative to cricoid pressure and reported to be more effective than cricoid pressure in the prevention of gastric air insufflation during positive-pressure ventilation by facemask. Since this method compresses low left paratracheal level, it may affect the successful insertion of laryngeal mask airway. In this study, the investigators aimed to evaluate the effect of paratracheal esophagus pressure on the insertion of laryngeal mask airway compare to conventional cricoid pressure.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
108

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 25, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 27, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 2, 2020

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 17, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 17, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

January 13, 2021

Status Verified

January 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

September 25, 2019

Last Update Submit

January 11, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Laryngeal mask airwayParatracheal esophageal pressureCricoid pressure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The success rate of device insertion

    Successful insertion of laryngeal mask airway in a maximum of three attempts

    During induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 seconds

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • The grade of fiberoptic bronchoscopic view

    During induction of anesthesia, an average of 5 minutes

  • The time for successful insertion of the device

    : During induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 seconds

  • Peak inspiratory pressure

    At 5 minute after insertion of laryngeal mask airway

  • The ease of insertion of device

    During induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 seconds

  • The number of attempts at insertion of device

    During induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 seconds

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

PP group

EXPERIMENTAL

During the induction of anesthesia, left paratracheal pressure is applied by 30N force with thumb after confirmation of the location of the esophagus using ultrasound.

Procedure: Paratracheal pressure

CP group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

During the induction of anesthesia, cricoid pressure is applied by 30N force with three finger.

Procedure: Cricoid pressure

Interventions

To apply paratracheal pressure, the thumb was placed over the left side of the trachea cephalad to the clavicle and medial to the sternocleidomastoid muscle.

PP group

To apply cricoid pressure, the cricoid cartilage is compressed by 30N force with a single-handed three finger maneuvre towards the vertebral bodies.

CP group

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who are undergoing surgery under general anesthesia where supraglottic airway management will be appropriate
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification 1-2

You may not qualify if:

  • Body mass index \> 35 kg/m2
  • High risk of regurgitation (hiatus hernia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, non-fasting status)
  • Criteria for difficult airway (limitation of mouth opening/neck extension, Mallampati class IV),

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ajou university hospital

Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16499, South Korea

Location

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The group assignments were sealed in opaque envelopes by a research assistant not involved in the study.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized double blinded clinical trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2019

First Posted

September 27, 2019

Study Start

January 2, 2020

Primary Completion

July 17, 2020

Study Completion

July 17, 2020

Last Updated

January 13, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations