Intrathecal Opioids for Pain Control After Cesarean Delivery: Determining the Optimal Dose
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Both hydromorphone and morphine are administered as part of spinal anesthesia to help improve pain control after cesarean delivery. In this study, the investigators are going to determine the doses of each of those medicines that provides optimal pain control to women undergoing cesarean delivery while limiting side effects related to those medicines. The investigators hypothesize that the doses of hydromorphone and morphine that provide optimal pain control without significant side effects will be 100 micrograms and 150 micrograms, respectively. The investigators further hypothesize that at each respective optimal dose, side effects will be less in the hydromorphone group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 9, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 20, 2016
CompletedJuly 25, 2016
June 1, 2016
11 months
December 9, 2013
March 15, 2016
June 23, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Dose of IT Morphine and IT Hydromorphone for Adequate Analgesia (Pain Score Less Than or Equal to 3) in 90% of Patients
Each patient will be interviewed by a member of the study team 12 hours after receiving their spinal anesthetic (which will include either hydromorphone or morphine). Patients will be asked to rate their current level of pain on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). A pain score \<4 will be considered a success. The up-down sequential allocation method will be used to determine the dose (mcg) of IT hydromorphone and IT morphine for subsequent patients
12 hours after administration of spinal anesthesia
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Side Effects: Pruritus
6 hours after spinal administration
Side Effects: Nausea
6 hours after spinal
Side Effects: Sedation
6, 12, and 24 hours after spinal administration
Pruritus
12 hours after spinal
Pruritus
24 hours after spinal
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intrathecal hydromorphone
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be randomized to receive a one-time dose of intrathecal hydromorphone or intrathecal morphine as part of their spinal anesthesia. The starting dose of intrathecal hydromorphone will be 40 micrograms. This will be adjusted in subsequent patients based on the previous patient's success or failure according to an up-and-down methodology utilizing a biased coin design.
Intrathecal morphine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be randomized to receive a one-time dose of intrathecal hydromorphone or intrathecal morphine as part of their spinal anesthesia. The starting dose of intrathecal morphine will be 100 micrograms. This will be adjusted in subsequent patients based on the previous patient's success or failure according to an up-and-down methodology utilizing a biased coin design.
Interventions
Duramorph is administered as part of spinal anesthesia for post-operative pain relief.
Hydromorphone (Dilaudid) is administered in the intrathecal space for post-operative pain control
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women presenting for elective cesarean delivery with no major co-morbidities, including pregnancy induced co-morbidities (e.g. pre-eclampsia)
- Singleton gestation at term (37-42 weeks)
- Desire to have a spinal anesthesia technique for cesarean delivery
You may not qualify if:
- Current or historical evidence of clinically significant medical disease or condition
- Any contraindication to the administration of a spinal technique for anesthesia
- History of hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to opioid medications
- Chronic pain syndrome or current regular opioid use
- Evidence of anticipated fetal anomalies
- Allergy or intolerance to Tylenol, ketorolac, ibuprofen, or oxycodone
- BMI \> 40
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Rochester Methodist Hospital, Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55902, United States
Related Publications (9)
Beatty NC, Arendt KW, Niesen AD, Wittwer ED, Jacob AK. Analgesia after Cesarean delivery: a retrospective comparison of intrathecal hydromorphone and morphine. J Clin Anesth. 2013 Aug;25(5):379-383. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.01.014. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
PMID: 23965210BACKGROUNDPalmer CM, Emerson S, Volgoropolous D, Alves D. Dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1999 Feb;90(2):437-44. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199902000-00018.
PMID: 9952150BACKGROUNDRauch E. Intrathecal hydromorphone for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery: a retrospective study. AANA J. 2012 Aug;80(4 Suppl):S25-32.
PMID: 23248827BACKGROUNDRauch E. Intrathecal hydromorphone for cesarean delivery: in search of improved postoperative pain management: a case report. AANA J. 2011 Oct;79(5):427-32.
PMID: 23256273BACKGROUNDTerajima K, Onodera H, Kobayashi M, Yamanaka H, Ohno T, Konuma S, Ogawa R. Efficacy of intrathecal morphine for analgesia following elective cesarean section: comparison with previous delivery. J Nippon Med Sch. 2003 Aug;70(4):327-33. doi: 10.1272/jnms.70.327.
PMID: 12928713BACKGROUNDGehling M, Tryba M. Risks and side-effects of intrathecal morphine combined with spinal anaesthesia: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2009 Jun;64(6):643-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05817.x.
PMID: 19462494BACKGROUNDDougherty TB, Baysinger CL, Henenberger JC, Gooding DJ. Epidural hydromorphone with and without epinephrine for post-operative analgesia after cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 1989 Mar;68(3):318-22.
PMID: 2465709BACKGROUNDPace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a precis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology. 2007 Jul;107(1):144-52. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000267514.42592.2a.
PMID: 17585226BACKGROUNDGerancher JC, Floyd H, Eisenach J. Determination of an effective dose of intrathecal morphine for pain relief after cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 1999 Feb;88(2):346-51. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199902000-00023.
PMID: 9972754BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Hans Sviggum
- Organization
- Mayo Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hans P Sviggum, M.D.
Mayo Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 9, 2013
First Posted
December 12, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
July 25, 2016
Results First Posted
May 20, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06