Study Stopped
New method of pain control pushed by surgeons.
A Comparison Trial Between PCA and Epidural Analgesia for Pectus Excavatum Repair
A Comparison Trial Between Patient Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCA) and Epidural Analgesia for Pectus Excavatum Repair
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of epidural and IV analgesia in controlling pain in patients undergoing Nuss repair of pectus excavatum. The primary end point will be the mean pain score during postoperative days 0-4.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Aug 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 4, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 11, 2020
CompletedJune 11, 2020
June 1, 2020
6.7 years
February 4, 2014
April 3, 2020
June 1, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Verbal Pain Scale Scores During Postoperative Days 0-4
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of epidural and IV analgesia in controlling pain in patients undergoing Nuss repair of pectus excavatum. The primary end point will be the mean pain scores during postoperative days (POD) 0-4. Pain was measured using the verbal pain scale. The scale ranges from 0-10. A score of 0 means the patient is in no pain.
Postoperative days 0-4
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Total Morphine Equivalent Consumption During Postoperative Days 0-4
Postoperative days 0-4
Rescue Morphine Equivalent Administration During Postoperative Days 0-4
Postoperative days 0-4
Study Arms (2)
Patient Controlled Analgesia
ACTIVE COMPARATOROne group will have a patient controlled device connected to an intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV PCA). This device runs a basal infusion of pain medicine (morphine) intravenously with additional allowable patient controlled doses every 10 minutes.
epidural Catheter
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe other group will have an epidural catheter inserted under sterile conditions in the thoracic epidural space after anesthesia has been induced. This will be connected to a patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) device for postoperative pain control that works in a similar manner except the medication (a combination of local anesthetics and hydromorphone) will be administered in the thoracic epidural space.
Interventions
In keeping with standard practice at the TCH, the position of the thoracic epidural catheter tip will be confirmed by real time fluoroscopy and a single injection of 1 ml of omnipaque 180 mg/mL contrast. In keeping with current practice, a bolus of 0.2% ropivacaine 0.3 ml per kg (maximum dose 20 ml) will be administered in the epidural space to the patients in the TEA group at least 10 minutes prior to surgical incision.
This device runs a basal infusion of pain medicine (morphine) intravenously with additional allowable patient controlled doses every 10 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients age 8- 18 years 2) Patients undergoing minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair via Nuss procedure 3) American Society of Anesthesiology Status I-III
You may not qualify if:
- \) Refusal of epidural catheter 2) Pregnancy 3) Bleeding History 4) Inability to understand how to use the PCA device 5) Medication interfering with blood coagulation 6) Patients allergic to local anesthetics 7) Patient refusal to participate in study 8) Developmental delay
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Texas Children't Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Chris Glover, MD, MBA
- Organization
- Baylor College of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chris Glover, MD
Baylor College of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Pediatric Anesthesiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 4, 2014
First Posted
February 5, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2012
Primary Completion
April 10, 2019
Study Completion
October 1, 2019
Last Updated
June 11, 2020
Results First Posted
June 11, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share