NCT02056301

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of epidural and IV analgesia in controlling pain in patients undergoing Nuss repair of pectus excavatum. The primary end point will be the mean pain score during postoperative days 0-4.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
62

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2012

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2012

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 4, 2014

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 5, 2014

Completed
5.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 10, 2019

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2019

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 11, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

June 11, 2020

Status Verified

June 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

6.7 years

First QC Date

February 4, 2014

Results QC Date

April 3, 2020

Last Update Submit

June 1, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Verbal Pain Scale Scores During Postoperative Days 0-4

    The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of epidural and IV analgesia in controlling pain in patients undergoing Nuss repair of pectus excavatum. The primary end point will be the mean pain scores during postoperative days (POD) 0-4. Pain was measured using the verbal pain scale. The scale ranges from 0-10. A score of 0 means the patient is in no pain.

    Postoperative days 0-4

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Total Morphine Equivalent Consumption During Postoperative Days 0-4

    Postoperative days 0-4

  • Rescue Morphine Equivalent Administration During Postoperative Days 0-4

    Postoperative days 0-4

Study Arms (2)

Patient Controlled Analgesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

One group will have a patient controlled device connected to an intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV PCA). This device runs a basal infusion of pain medicine (morphine) intravenously with additional allowable patient controlled doses every 10 minutes.

Drug: Morphine

epidural Catheter

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The other group will have an epidural catheter inserted under sterile conditions in the thoracic epidural space after anesthesia has been induced. This will be connected to a patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) device for postoperative pain control that works in a similar manner except the medication (a combination of local anesthetics and hydromorphone) will be administered in the thoracic epidural space.

Drug: Hydromorphone

Interventions

In keeping with standard practice at the TCH, the position of the thoracic epidural catheter tip will be confirmed by real time fluoroscopy and a single injection of 1 ml of omnipaque 180 mg/mL contrast. In keeping with current practice, a bolus of 0.2% ropivacaine 0.3 ml per kg (maximum dose 20 ml) will be administered in the epidural space to the patients in the TEA group at least 10 minutes prior to surgical incision.

epidural Catheter

This device runs a basal infusion of pain medicine (morphine) intravenously with additional allowable patient controlled doses every 10 minutes

Patient Controlled Analgesia

Eligibility Criteria

Age8 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients age 8- 18 years 2) Patients undergoing minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair via Nuss procedure 3) American Society of Anesthesiology Status I-III

You may not qualify if:

  • \) Refusal of epidural catheter 2) Pregnancy 3) Bleeding History 4) Inability to understand how to use the PCA device 5) Medication interfering with blood coagulation 6) Patients allergic to local anesthetics 7) Patient refusal to participate in study 8) Developmental delay

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Texas Children't Hospital

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Funnel Chest

Interventions

HydromorphoneMorphine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone Diseases, DevelopmentalBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMusculoskeletal AbnormalitiesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Morphine DerivativesMorphinansOpiate AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPhenanthrenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Chris Glover, MD, MBA
Organization
Baylor College of Medicine

Study Officials

  • Chris Glover, MD

    Baylor College of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Pediatric Anesthesiologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2014

First Posted

February 5, 2014

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion

April 10, 2019

Study Completion

October 1, 2019

Last Updated

June 11, 2020

Results First Posted

June 11, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations