Low Rectal Cancer Study (MERCURY II)
MERCURY II
The Low Rectal Cancer Study.
1 other identifier
observational
542
3 countries
17
Brief Summary
The MERCURY Study demonstrated the accuracy, feasibility and reproducibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to stage rectal cancer in a prospective, multidisciplinary, multi-centre study. However, there were differences in patient outcome, dependent upon the position of the tumour in the rectum and its height above the anal verge. Whilst the outcome was excellent for patients who underwent an anterior resection, the outcome, based upon margin involvement and quality of the specimen, was poor for patients who underwent an abdomino-perineal excision for low rectal cancer. It is proposed that accurate MRI staging pre-operatively will allow the correct patients to receive neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and also pre-warn the surgeons if the resection margins appear threatened so that the operation can be modified to take this into account. The primary aims of the Low Rectal Cancer Study (MERCURY II) are to assess the rate of CRM positivity rate in low rectal cancer and to assess the difference in global quality of life at two years post surgery in patients according to plane of surgery with or without sphincter preservation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2007
Longer than P75 for all trials
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 13, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 21, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 11, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 11, 2021
CompletedSeptember 18, 2018
September 1, 2018
8.6 years
November 21, 2013
September 17, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
To assess the rate of CRM positivity rate in low rectal cancer.
4 years
To compare global quality of life at two years post surgery in patients according to plane of surgery with or without sphincter preservation.
8 years
Secondary Outcomes (6)
To compare patient reported outcomes in patients according to plane of surgery with or without sphincter preservation.
8 years
Analysis of the clinical and radiological factors influencing the decision by surgeons to carry out Anterior Resections, APE or extralevator APE.
8 years
Comparison of time to local recurrence, disease-free and overall survival between patients undergoing different types of surgery.
8 years
Comparison of imaging and pathology staging assessment, patient characteristics and complication rates, between different types of surgery and surgical approaches.
8 years
Investigation of potential associations between imaging and pathology assessment of radial and distal margins, neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, perineal complications and sphincter preservation rates.
8 years
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Staging and outcomes for patients with Low Rectal Cancer
Low Rectal Cancer defined on MRI as a cancer within 6cm of the anal verge
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with biopsy proven adenocarcinoma within 6cm of the anal verge confirmed on MRI.
You may qualify if:
- Ability to give informed, written consent.
- Adults age 18 or over - male or female.
- Recently diagnosed with biopsy-proven, primary, low rectal cancer.
- No previous therapy for rectal cancer.
You may not qualify if:
- Current pregnancy, including ectopic pregnancy.
- Previous pelvic/rectal malignancy (excluding carcinoma in-situ).
- Previous pelvic radiotherapy.
- Previous pelvic floor surgery for faecal incontinence or prolapse.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trustlead
- Pelican Cancer Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (17)
Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain
Berlin, 10249, Germany
Krankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt
Dresden, 01067, Germany
The First Surgical Clinic
Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
Milton Keynes General Hospital
Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, MK6 5LD, United Kingdom
Stepping Hill Hospital
Stockport, Cheshire, SK2 7JE, United Kingdom
North Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust (Basingstoke Hospital)
Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG24 9NA, United Kingdom
West Middlesex University Hospital
Isleworth, Middlesex, TW7 6AF, United Kingdom
Weston General Hospital
Weston-super-Mare, Somerset, BS23 4TQ, United Kingdom
Croydon University Hospital
Croydon, Surrey, CR7 7YE, United Kingdom
Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Frimley, Surrey, GU16 7UJ, United Kingdom
Princess of Wales Hospital
Bridgend, Wales, CF31 1RQ, United Kingdom
University Hospital of Wales
Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4XW, United Kingdom
Bradford Royal Infirmary
Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD9 6RJ, United Kingdom
Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust (Salisbury District Hospital)
Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP2 8BJ, United Kingdom
Ulster Hospital
Belfast, BT16 1RH, United Kingdom
Royal Marsden Hospital
London & Surrey, United Kingdom
North Manchester General Hospital
Manchester, M8 5RB, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Battersby NJ, How P, Moran B, Stelzner S, West NP, Branagan G, Strassburg J, Quirke P, Tekkis P, Pedersen BG, Gudgeon M, Heald B, Brown G; MERCURY II Study Group. Prospective Validation of a Low Rectal Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging System and Development of a Local Recurrence Risk Stratification Model: The MERCURY II Study. Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):751-60. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001193.
PMID: 25822672DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gina Brown
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brendan Moran
Pelican Cancer Foundation
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 21, 2013
First Posted
December 9, 2013
Study Start
August 13, 2007
Primary Completion
March 11, 2016
Study Completion
March 11, 2021
Last Updated
September 18, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-09