Randomized Trial on Robotic Assisted Resection for Rectal Cancer
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Bladder and Sexual Functions of Patients Who Undergo Laparoscopic and Robotic Assisted Resection for Rectal Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
98
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hypothesis: the bladder and sexual functions can be better preserved in patients with robotic assisted rectal surgery This is a randomized trial comparing the bladder and sexual function of patients who undergo laparoscopic and robotic assisted rectal resection for rectal cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jun 2009
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 24, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedMay 25, 2010
May 1, 2010
5 years
May 24, 2010
May 24, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bladder function
Urodynamic Questionnaire
one year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
tumor status
One year
Quality of life
one year
Study Arms (2)
robotic
EXPERIMENTALrobotic assisted rectal resection
laparoscopic
ACTIVE COMPARATORlaparoscopic rectal resection
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologically proven new case of rectal cancer with the lower border within 15 cm from anal verge
- Age \>18 years
- Informed consent obtained
- American Society of Anesthesiologist class 1-3
- No contraindication to laparoscopic surgery
- Acceptable operating risk
You may not qualify if:
- Locally advanced fixed tumor with the need for exenterative surgery
- Severe cardiac or pulmonary comorbidity rendering pneumoperitoneum hazardous
- Multiple previous operations with the anticipation of dense peritoneal adhesions
- No informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wai Lun Law, MBBS, MS
The University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2010
First Posted
May 25, 2010
Study Start
June 1, 2009
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 25, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-05