Antidepressant Response in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms and Frailty Characteristics in Older Adults
2 other identifiers
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this open-administration treatment study of citalopram (or duloxetine) is to evaluate the effect of antidepressant medication on treating the syndrome of "frailty" in older adults with depressive symptoms. Patients with significant depressive symptoms (defined as CES-D (Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression scale) \> 10) and 1 or more symptoms of the frailty syndrome (exhaustion, decreased energy, weight loss, decreased grip strength, and slow/unsteady gait) will be evaluated and treated with citalopram (or duloxetine) for 8 weeks to test whether antidepressant medication improves both the syndrome of frailty and depressive symptoms. Patients evaluated at the Adult and Late Life Depression clinic and eligible to participate in the study will be treated with an antidepressant medication and assessed on the primary outcome variables (characteristics of frailty, depressive symptoms) as well as on secondary variables which include cognition (global cognition, episodic memory, executive function), and function (physical mobility, instrumental activities of daily living, and social functioning) prior to treatment initiation and following 8-weeks of treatment. The hypotheses for this protocol predict that we will discover a significant improvement on both frailty characteristics and depressive symptoms in this clinical population when treated with antidepressant medication (citalopram or duloxetine).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 major-depressive-disorder
Started Feb 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_4 major-depressive-disorder
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 25, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 31, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 19, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 5, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 5, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 13, 2021
CompletedJanuary 29, 2021
January 1, 2021
5.8 years
October 25, 2013
November 19, 2020
January 12, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD)
Measure Description: Our target is depressive symptomatology as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). The HRSD is a 24-item questionnaire used as an indication of depression and a guide to evaluating recovery. Total scores range from 0-74, not including atypical symptoms sub-scale. A score above 16 is typically considered to indicate the presence of depressive symptoms. Higher scores indicate greater severity.
Week 8
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD)
Measure Description: Our target is depressive symptomatology as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). The HRSD is a 24-item questionnaire used as an indication of depression and a guide to evaluating recovery. Total scores range from 0-74, not including atypical symptoms sub-scale. A score above 16 is typically considered to indicate the presence of depressive symptoms. Higher scores indicate greater severity.
6 Months
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HRSD)
Measure Description: Our target is depressive symptomatology as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). The HRSD is a 24-item questionnaire used as an indication of depression and a guide to evaluating recovery. Total scores range from 0-74, not including atypical symptoms sub-scale. A score above 16 is typically considered to indicate the presence of depressive symptoms. Higher scores indicate greater severity.
12 Months
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Stratified by Baseline Frailty
Measure Description: Our target is depressive symptomatology as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). The HRSD is a 24-item questionnaire used as an indication of depression and a guide to evaluating recovery. Total scores range from 0-74, not including atypical symptoms sub-scale. A score above 16 is typically considered to indicate the presence of depressive symptoms. Higher scores indicate greater severity.
Baseline (Week 0)
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Stratified by Baseline Frailty
Measure Description: Our target is depressive symptomatology as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). The HRSD is a 24-item questionnaire used as an indication of depression and a guide to evaluating recovery. Total scores range from 0-74, not including atypical symptoms sub-scale. A score above 16 is typically considered to indicate the presence of depressive symptoms. Higher scores indicate greater severity.
Week 8
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Stratified by Baseline Frailty
Measure Description: Our target is depressive symptomatology as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). The HRSD is a 24-item questionnaire used as an indication of depression and a guide to evaluating recovery. Total scores range from 0-74, not including atypical symptoms sub-scale. A score above 16 is typically considered to indicate the presence of depressive symptoms. Higher scores indicate greater severity.
Month 6
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Stratified by Baseline Frailty
Measure Description: Our target is depressive symptomatology as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). The HRSD is a 24-item questionnaire used as an indication of depression and a guide to evaluating recovery. Total scores range from 0-74, not including atypical symptoms sub-scale. A score above 16 is typically considered to indicate the presence of depressive symptoms. Higher scores indicate greater severity.
Month 12
Secondary Outcomes (8)
World Health Organization Disability Assessment 2.0 (36-item)
Baseline (Week 0)
World Health Organization Disability Assessment 2.0 (36-item)
Week 8
World Health Organization Disability Assessment 2.0 (36-item)
6 Months
World Health Organization Disability Assessment 2.0 (36-item)
12 Months
World Health Organization Disability Assessment 2.0 (36-item)--Stratified by Baseline Frailty
Baseline (Week 0)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Medication Treatment
EXPERIMENTALParticipants are treated with a flexible-dose antidepressant medication for a period of 8 weeks.
Interventions
If patient has a history of non-response or cannot tolerate escitalopram and/or duloxetine, then they will be treated openly with an approved antidepressant.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Anyone with 1 or more characteristics of frailty
- HRSD\>16 and a DSM-IV depressive disorder (e.g. MDD, Dysthymia)
- Capable of providing informed consent
- Currently followed by a PCP (had an eval in last 6-months)
You may not qualify if:
- Acute cancer treatment
- Acute, severe or unstable medical illness
- End stage medical illness (e.g. liver, kidney, pulmonary)
- Mini Mental Exam \< 24 or a diagnosis of dementia
- Individuals who do not have capacity to consent
- Diagnosis of substance abuse or dependence (last 12 months), excluding Nicotine dependence
- History of psychosis or psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder
- Patient is considered a significant risk of suicide
- Subject is considered based on history to be unlikely to respond to the single agent antidepressant (i.e., subjects with treatment resistant depression, including subjects with previous treatment with ECT)
- History of allergic or adverse reaction to escitalopram or duloxetine, or non-response to adequate trial of escitalopram (at least 4 weeks at dose of 20 mg) or duloxetine (at least 4 weeks at dose of 90mg).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
New York State Psychiatric Institute
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Related Publications (5)
Binder EF, Yarasheski KE, Steger-May K, Sinacore DR, Brown M, Schechtman KB, Holloszy JO. Effects of progressive resistance training on body composition in frail older adults: results of a randomized, controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005 Nov;60(11):1425-31. doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.11.1425.
PMID: 16339329BACKGROUNDBrown M, Sinacore DR, Binder EF, Kohrt WM. Physical and performance measures for the identification of mild to moderate frailty. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Jun;55(6):M350-5. doi: 10.1093/gerona/55.6.m350.
PMID: 10843356BACKGROUNDFried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.
PMID: 11253156BACKGROUNDBrown PJ, Roose SP, O'Boyle KR, Ciarleglio A, Maas B, Igwe KC, Chung S, Gomez S, Naqvi M, Brickman AM, Rutherford BR. Frailty and Its Correlates in Adults With Late Life Depression. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;28(2):145-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
PMID: 31734083RESULTBrown PJ, Ciarleglio A, Roose SP, Garcia CM, Chung S, Alvarez J, Stein A, Gomez S, Rutherford BR. Frailty Worsens Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes in Late Life Depression. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;29(9):944-955. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.12.024. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
PMID: 33388223RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Patrick J Brown
- Organization
- New York State Psychiatric Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patrick Brown, PhD
New York State Psychiatric Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Clinical Psychology (in Psychiatry)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2013
First Posted
October 31, 2013
Study Start
February 19, 2014
Primary Completion
December 5, 2019
Study Completion
December 5, 2020
Last Updated
January 29, 2021
Results First Posted
January 13, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01