Developing New Clinical Management Strategies
1 other identifier
interventional
3
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to develop new methods of administering antidepressant medications that will result in improved drug/placebo separation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and enhanced medication response in open clinical treatment. The highly intensive, weekly visit schedule followed in most antidepressant RCTs radically differs from how antidepressant medications are prescribed in standard clinical practice and is believed to be a major reason why the majority of studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) fail to show a significant difference between medication and placebo. Moreover, a "one size fits all" approach to psychopharmacologic management (i.e., weekly visits for all patients) does not take into account differences between patients that may predispose some individuals to respond positively to frequent follow-up visits, while others may respond negatively or not at all. Clinic visits comprise multiple components that may be therapeutic for depression, including activating patients' behavior, exposing them to medical procedures, permitting social interactions with research staff, and providing supportive meetings with clinicians. Two independent meta-analyses have associated more frequent study visits with increased antidepressant and placebo response as well as decreased separation between medication and placebo. Despite the high costs and potential disadvantages of weekly follow-up visits for patients receiving antidepressant medication, this clinical management strategy has not been studied prospectively to date. It is unknown whether weekly follow-up visits are needed to ensure treatment compliance and patient safety in clinical trials and to what degree contacts with clinicians influence medication and placebo response.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4 major-depressive-disorder
Started Sep 2012
Typical duration for phase_4 major-depressive-disorder
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 4, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 7, 2017
CompletedMarch 3, 2020
February 1, 2020
2.9 years
March 6, 2014
April 3, 2017
February 24, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression
scale for depressive symptoms administered by trained rater. The HRSD is the standard measure of depression severity for clinical trials of antidepressants and was chosen as the primary outcome measure over other depression rating scales to ensure compatibility of study results with our meta-analyses and ongoing studies of expectancy. Although the HRSD list 21 items, the scoring is based on the first 17 items. sum of the scores of the first 17 items (range from 0 to 54): 0-7 = NORMAL 8-13 = Mild Depression 14-18 = Moderate Depression 19-22 = Severe Depression \>=23 = Very Severe Depression
Baseline week
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) 14-item Scale
Baseline week
CGI Severity and Improvement
Baseline week
Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale
Baseline week
California Pharmacotherapy Alliance Scale (CALPAS)-Clinician Version
Baseline week
Blind Assessment-Clinician Version
8 weeks
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Clinical Frequency Management: Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORStudy visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4.
Research Frequency Management: Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORWeekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders.
Clinical Frequency Management: Escitalopram
ACTIVE COMPARATORStudy visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4.
Research Frequency Management: Escitalopram
ACTIVE COMPARATORWeekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders.
Interventions
A substance or treatment of no intended therapeutic value in a pill form.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. men and women aged 18-60 years
- \. diagnosis with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) IV Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
- \. 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score greater than or equal to 18
- \. capable of providing informed consent and complying with study procedures
- \. using appropriate contraceptive method if woman of child-bearing age
You may not qualify if:
- \. Current comorbid Axis I DSM IV disorder other than Nicotine Dependence, Adjustment Disorder, or Anxiety Disorder
- \. diagnosis of substance abuse or dependence (excluding Nicotine Dependence) within the past 12 months
- \. present or past history of psychosis, psychotic disorder, mania, or bipolar disorder
- \. baseline HRSD score \> 28 or HRSD suicide item \> 2
- \. history of allergic or adverse reaction to escitalopram, or non-response to adequate trial of escitalopram (at least 4 weeks at dose of 20mg) during the current episode
- \. current treatment with psychotherapy, antidepressants, antipsychotics, or mood stabilizers
- \. CGI-Severity score of 7 at baseline
- \. acute, severe, or unstable medical illness
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
New York State Psychiatric Institute
New York, New York, 10032, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Bret Rutherford
- Organization
- New York State Psychiatric Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bret Rutherford, MD
New York State Psychiatric Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2014
First Posted
March 10, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2012
Primary Completion
August 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 4, 2015
Last Updated
March 3, 2020
Results First Posted
July 7, 2017
Record last verified: 2020-02