NCT03812588

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to develop new methods of administering antidepressant medications that will result in improved drug/placebo separation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and enhanced medication response in open clinical treatment. The highly intensive, weekly visit schedule followed in most antidepressant RCTs radically differs from how antidepressant medications are prescribed in standard clinical practice and is believed to be a major reason why the majority of studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) fail to show a significant difference between medication and placebo. Moreover, a "one size fits all" approach to psychopharmacologic management (i.e., weekly visits for all patients) does not take into account differences between patients that may predispose some individuals to respond positively to frequent follow-up visits, while others may respond negatively or not at all. Clinic visits comprise multiple components that may be therapeutic for depression, including activating patients' behavior, exposing them to medical procedures, permitting social interactions with research staff, and providing supportive meetings with clinicians. Two independent meta-analyses have associated more frequent study visits with increased antidepressant and placebo response as well as decreased separation between medication and placebo. Despite the high costs and potential disadvantages of weekly follow-up visits for patients receiving antidepressant medication, this clinical management strategy has not been studied prospectively to date. It is unknown whether weekly follow-up visits are needed to ensure treatment compliance and patient safety in clinical trials and to what degree contacts with clinicians influence medication and placebo response.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
29

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4 major-depressive-disorder

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 15, 2019

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 23, 2019

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 30, 2019

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 27, 2020

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2021

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 21, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 21, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

January 15, 2019

Results QC Date

February 28, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 28, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 24-Item Scale to Study Completion (8 Weeks)

    Scale for depressive symptoms administered by trained rater. The Hamilton is the standard measure of depression severity for clinical trials of antidepressants and was chosen as the primary outcome measure over other depression rating scales to ensure compatibility of study results with our meta-analyses and ongoing studies of expectancy. The scoring is based on the first 24 items of the Hamilton. Sum of the scores of the first 24 items (range from 0 to 74): 0-7 = NORMAL 8-13 = Mild Depression 14-18 = Moderate Depression 19-22 = Severe Depression \>=23 = Very Severe Depression

    Up to 8 Weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale 14-item Scale

    Up to 8 Weeks

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Baseline Clinical Global Impressions

    Up to 8 Weeks

Study Arms (4)

Clinical Frequency Management: Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Study visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits.

Drug: Placebo

Research Frequency Management: Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Weekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits.

Drug: Placebo

Clinical Frequency Management: Escitalopram

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Study visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits.

Drug: Escitalopram

Research Frequency Management: Escitalopram

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Weekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits.

Drug: Escitalopram

Interventions

Escitalopram is a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) medication that appears to help with symptoms of depression by increasing the availability of specific chemicals in the brain.

Also known as: Lexapro
Clinical Frequency Management: EscitalopramResearch Frequency Management: Escitalopram

A placebo (or dummy pill) is an inert (inactive) substance, typically a tablet, capsule or other dose form that does not contain an active drug ingredient.

Clinical Frequency Management: PlaceboResearch Frequency Management: Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men and women aged 18-75 years 1. Clinical interview
  • Diagnosis with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) V Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) 2. Clinical interview, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V
  • item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score ≥ 16 and ≤ 28; 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score \< 25 3. HRSD by trained rater
  • Capable of providing informed consent and complying with study procedures 4. Clinical interview
  • Using appropriate contraceptive method if woman of child-bearing age and not currently pregnant 5. Clinical interview

You may not qualify if:

  • Current comorbid Axis I DSM V disorder other than Mild Substance Use Disorder, Adjustment Disorder, Anxiety Disorder or Personality Disorder 1. Clinical interview, SCID
  • Diagnosis of Moderate to Severe Substance Use Disorder within the past 12 months 2. Clinical interview, SCID, Urine tox
  • present or past history of psychosis, psychotic disorder, mania, or bipolar disorder 3. Clinical interview, SCID
  • baseline HRSD 24-item score \> 28 or HRSD suicide item \> 2 or baseline HRSD 17-item score ≥ 25 4. HRSD by trained rater
  • History of allergic or adverse reaction to escitalopram, or non-response to adequate trial of escitalopram (at least 4 weeks at dose of 20mg) during the current episode 5. Clinical interview
  • Current treatment with psychotherapy, antidepressants, antipsychotics, or mood stabilizers 6. Clinical interview
  • CGI-Severity score of 6 or greater at baseline 7. CGI based on Clinical interview
  • Acute, severe, or unstable medical illness 8. Clinical interview, Physical Exam, Screening Labs

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

New York State Psychiatric Institute

New York, New York, 10032, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, Major

Interventions

Escitalopram

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Depressive DisorderMood DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PropylaminesAminesOrganic ChemicalsNitrilesBenzofuransHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Limitations and Caveats

Due to challenges associated with the pandemic, the study was completed with a smaller sample size than originally intended.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Bret Rutherford
Organization
New York State Psychiatric Institute

Study Officials

  • Bret Rutherford, MD

    New York State Psychiatric Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor in Clinical Psychiatry

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2019

First Posted

January 23, 2019

Study Start

January 30, 2019

Primary Completion

May 27, 2020

Study Completion

August 1, 2021

Last Updated

April 21, 2022

Results First Posted

April 21, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Locations