A Pilot Study of an RCT to Improve Infection Management in Advanced Dementia
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To conduct a pilot study of cluster randomized clinical trial of an practice intervention to improve the quality of care for suspected lower respiratory and and urinary tract infections among 60 nursing home residents with advanced dementia living in 4 facilities (2 matched intervention/control pairs) for 12 months. We hypothesize that 1. In the intervention compared to the control facilities there will be a trend towards a greater proportion of infections for which antimicrobials were initiated appropriately, and 2. in the intervention compared to the control facilities there will be a trend towards higher proxy satisfaction with decision-making, fewer hospital transfers, and lower antimicrobial exposure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Oct 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 17, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 21, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2016
CompletedAugust 23, 2016
September 1, 2015
2.3 years
October 17, 2013
August 19, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
proportion of suspected infectious episodes for which antimicrobials were initiated appropriately
The primary outcome will be the proportion of suspected infectious episodes for which antimicrobials were initiated appropriately defined by 2 factors: i. minimal clinical criteria to start antimicrobials are met based on consensus guidelines, ii. treatment was consistent with proxy preferences (based on proxy interview).
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
hospital transfers
12 months
Other Outcomes (2)
antimicrobial use
12 months
Decision satisfaction
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALProvider Training: i. on-line education course and ii. algorithms and checklists. The course consists of 4 cases: 2 for urinary tract infection and 2 for lower respiratory tract infections with multiple choice questions and evidence-based feedback. To reinforce provider learning, posters displaying algorithms guiding appropriate antimicrobial initiation for infections will be placed in all nursing home units. Laminated pocket cards with the algorithms will be given to providers. Providers will complete simple checklists for each suspected infection throughout the study. B. Proxy Information: The printed material explains, in a lay fashion: i. the nature of infection in advanced dementia, ii. treatment options, iii. concerns about antimicrobial overuse, and iv. features of appropriate antimicrobial use.
Usual Care
OTHERResidents will receive usual care for infections
Interventions
Provider Training: i. on-line education course and ii. algorithms and checklists. The course consists of 4 cases: 2 for urinary tract infection and 2 for lower respiratory tract infections with multiple choice questions and evidence-based feedback. To reinforce provider learning, posters displaying algorithms guiding appropriate antimicrobial initiation for infections will be placed in all nursing home units. Laminated pocket cards with the algorithms will be given to providers. Providers will complete simple checklists for each suspected infection throughout the study. B. Proxy Information: The printed material explains, in a lay fashion: i. the nature of infection in advanced dementia, ii. treatment options, iii. concerns about antimicrobial overuse, and iv. features of appropriate antimicrobial use.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Resident eligibility criteria include: 1) Age \> 65, 2) Dementia, 3) Global Deterioration Scale score of 7,59 and 4) a proxy is available who can speak in English. Features of Global deterioration stage 7 include: profound memory deficits (cannot recognize family), total functional dependence, speech \< 5 words, incontinence, and inability to ambulate.
- Eligibility criteria for providers in the intervention nursing homes include: Medical Doctor,a. nurse, nurse practitioner, physician assistant identified by a senior administrator as an individual who cares for residents with advanced dementia, and is 2. able to communicate in English because on-line course and algorithms are in English., and 3. over 21 years of age.
You may not qualify if:
- Residents with cognitive impairment due to causes other than dementia (e.g., head trauma) and in short-term, sub-acute SNFs will be excluded. -
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hebrew SeniorLifelead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hebrew SeniorLife
Boston, Massachusetts, 02131, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2013
First Posted
October 21, 2013
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 23, 2016
Record last verified: 2015-09