NCT01953601

Brief Summary

This study consists of two parts, Part 1 and Part 2. Part 1 assesses the efficacy and safety of verubecestat (MK-8931) compared with placebo administered for 104 weeks in the treatment of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) due to Alzheimer's Disease (AD), also known as prodromal AD. Participants are randomized to receive placebo, or 12 mg or 40 mg verubecestat, once daily. The primary study hypothesis for Part 1 is that ≥1 verubecestat dose is superior to placebo with respect to the change from baseline in the Clinical Dementia Rating scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) score at 104 weeks. Participants completing Part 1 may choose to participate in Part 2, which is a long term double-blind extension to assess efficacy and safety of verubecestat administered for up to an additional 260 weeks. In Part 2, all participants receive either 12 mg or 40 mg verubecestat, once daily.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,454

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2013

Typical duration for phase_3

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 25, 2013

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 1, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 5, 2013

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 17, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 17, 2018

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 17, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

May 17, 2019

Status Verified

May 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

4.4 years

First QC Date

September 25, 2013

Results QC Date

April 15, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 15, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Part 1 (Base Study). Least Squares Mean (LSM) Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Week 104

    LSM change from baseline at week 104 was assessed for CDR-SB score, a clinical rating of global cognitive function, comprised of 6 domains: memory; orientation; judgment and problem solving; community affairs; home and hobbies; and personal care. For each domain, the degree of impairment is assessed by a semi-structured interview of the participant as well as the participant's caregiver. For each domain, potential scores range from 0 (no impairment) to 3 (severe impairment). Individual domain scores are summed to a total CDR-SB score (range: 0-18). Higher scores indicate more severe cognitive impairment. Further, increases in cognitive impairment would be reflected by increases in CDR-SB score.

    Baseline and Week 104 in Part 1

  • Part 2 (Extension Study). Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score at Week 130

    Mean change from baseline at week 130 was assessed for CDR-SB score, a clinical rating of global cognitive function, comprised of 6 domains: memory; orientation; judgment and problem solving; community affairs; home and hobbies; and personal care. For each domain, the degree of impairment is assessed by a semi-structured interview of the participant as well as the participant's caregiver. For each domain, potential scores range from 0 (no impairment) to 3 (severe impairment). Individual domain scores are summed to a total CDR-SB score (range: 0-18). Higher scores indicate more severe cognitive impairment. Further, increases in cognitive impairment would be reflected by increases in CDR-SB score. Per protocol, baseline refers to the baseline measurement obtained in Part 1.

    Baseline and Week 130 (i.e., Week 26 of Part 2)

  • Part 1 (Base Study). Percentage of Participants Who Experienced ≥1 Adverse Event (AE)

    The percentage of participants experiencing an AE in Part 1 was assessed. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.

    Up to Week 106 (up to 2 weeks following cessation of study treatment in Part 1)

  • Part 1 (Base Study). Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event (AE)

    The percentage of participants who discontinued from study drug due to an AE in Part 1 was assessed. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.

    Up to Week 104 in Part 1

  • Part 2 (Extension Study). Percentage of Participants Who Experienced ≥1 Adverse Event (AE)

    The percentage of participants experiencing an AE in Part 2 was assessed. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.

    From Week 104 (start of treatment in Part 2) up to Week 210 (up to 2 weeks following cessation of study treatment in Part 2)

  • Part 2 (Extension Study). Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event (AE)

    The percentage of participants who discontinued from study drug due to an AE in Part 2 was assessed. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.

    From Week 104 (start of treatment in Part 2) up to Week 208 (i.e., up to Week 104 in Part 2)

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Part 1 (Base Study). Event-Rate Per 100 Participant Years for Progression to a Clinical Diagnosis of Probable AD Dementia

    Up to Week 104 in Part 1

  • Part 1 (Base Study). Estimated Least Squares Mean Difference Between the Last (Week 104) and First (Week 13) Post-dose CDR-SB Assessment

    Week 13 and Week 104 in Part 1

  • Part 1 (Base Study). Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in the 3-Domain Composite Cognition Score (CCS-3D) at Week 104

    Baseline and Week 104 in Part 1

  • Part 1 (Base Study). Least Squares Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hippocampal Volume (THV) at Week 104

    Baseline and Week 104 in Part 1

  • Part 1 (Base Study). Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Composite Cortical Amyloid Standard Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) Assessed With Amyloid Tracer [18F]Flutemetamol Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging at Week 104

    Baseline and Week 104 in Part 1

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg (Part 1); 12 mg (Part 2)

EXPERIMENTAL

\[Part 1\] Verubecestat 12 mg once daily for 104 weeks in Part 1 (Base Study). \[Part 2\] Participants completing Part 1 and continuing to Part 2 (Extension Study) receive Verubecestat 12 mg once daily for an additional 260 weeks.

Drug: Verubecestat 12 mg (Parts 1 and 2)

Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg (Part 1); 40 mg (Part 2)

EXPERIMENTAL

\[Part 1\] Verubecestat 40 mg once daily for 104 weeks in Part 1 (Base Study). \[Part 2\] Participants completing Part 1 and continuing to Part 2 (Extension Study) receive Verubecestat 40 mg once daily for an additional 260 weeks.

Drug: Verubecestat 40 mg (Parts 1 and 2)

Arm C. Placebo (Part 1); Verubecestat 40 mg (Part 2)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

\[Part 1\] Placebo once daily for 104 weeks in Part 1 (Base Study). \[Part 2\] Participants completing Part 1 and continuing to Part 2 (Extension Study) receive Verubecestat 40 mg once daily for an additional 260 weeks.

Drug: Verubecestat 40 mg (Parts 1 and 2)Other: Placebo (Part 1)

Interventions

Verubecestat 12 mg oral tablet, given once daily.

Also known as: MK-8931
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg (Part 1); 12 mg (Part 2)

Verubecestat 40 mg oral tablet, given once daily. Verubecestat 40 mg given to participants in Arm C continuing to study Part 2.

Also known as: MK-8931
Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg (Part 1); 40 mg (Part 2)Arm C. Placebo (Part 1); Verubecestat 40 mg (Part 2)

Placebo matching verubecestat, given once daily as an oral tablet.

Arm C. Placebo (Part 1); Verubecestat 40 mg (Part 2)

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of prodromal AD, including the following:
  • History of subjective memory decline with gradual onset and slow progression for at least one year corroborated by an informant,
  • Objective impairment in episodic memory by memory test performed at Screening,
  • Does not meet criteria for dementia, AND
  • Positive Screening amyloid imaging PET scan using \[18F\]flutametamol tracer or positive Screening CSF tau:amyloid-β42 (Aβ42) ratio (Participants with a prior positive amyloid imaging PET scan or a Screening PET scan with florbetaben or florbetapir may be enrolled without a Screening flutemetamol scan with Sponsor approval)
  • Able to read at a 6th grade level or equivalent
  • If participant is receiving an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor or memantine, the dose must have been stable for at least three months before Screening
  • Must have a reliable and competent trial partner/informant who has a close relationship with the participant and is willing to accompany the participant to all required trial visits, and to monitor compliance of the administration of the trial medication
  • Tolerated study drug and completed the initial 104-week period of the trial (Part 1)
  • Participant must have a reliable and competent trial partner who must have a close relationship with the subject

You may not qualify if:

  • History of stroke
  • Evidence of a clinically relevant neurological disorder other than the disease being studied (i.e., prodromal AD)
  • History of seizures or epilepsy within the last 5 years
  • Evidence of a clinically relevant or unstable psychiatric disorder, excluding major depression in remission
  • Participant is at imminent risk of self-harm or of harm to others
  • History of alcoholism or drug dependency/abuse within the last 5 years before Screening
  • Participant does not have a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan obtained within 12 months of Screening and is unwilling or not eligible to undergo an MRI scan at the Screening Visit. With Sponsor approval, a head computed tomography (CT) scan may be substituted for MRI scan to evaluate eligibility
  • History of hepatitis or liver disease that has been active within the 6 months prior to Screening
  • Recent or ongoing, uncontrolled, clinically significant medical condition within 3 months of Screening
  • History of malignancy occurring within the 5 years before Screening, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, or localized prostate carcinoma
  • Clinically significant vitamin B12 or folate deficiency in the 6 months before Screening
  • Use of any investigational drugs or participation in clinical trials within the 30 days before Screening
  • History of a hypersensitivity reaction to more than three drugs
  • Has human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by medical history
  • Participant is unwilling or has a contraindication to undergo PET scanning including but not limited to claustrophobia, excessive weight or girth
  • +8 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (5)

  • Voss T, Kost J, Mercer SP, Furtek C, Randolph C, Lines C, Egan MF, Cummings JL. Progression from Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease to Mild Alzheimer's Disease Dementia in the Verubecestat APECS Study: Adjudicating Diagnostic Transitions. J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;92(1):341-348. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220836.

  • Dockendorf MF, Jaworowicz D, Humphrey R, Anderson M, Breidinger S, Ma L, Taylor T, Dupre N, Jones C, Furtek C, Kantesaria B, Bateman KP, Woolf E, Egan MF, Stone JA. A Model-Based Approach to Bridging Plasma and Dried Blood Spot Concentration Data for Phase 3 Verubecestat Trials. AAPS J. 2022 Apr 6;24(3):53. doi: 10.1208/s12248-022-00682-5.

  • Wessels AM, Lines C, Stern RA, Kost J, Voss T, Mozley LH, Furtek C, Mukai Y, Aisen PS, Cummings JL, Tariot PN, Vellas B, Dupre N, Randolph C, Michelson D, Andersen SW, Shering C, Sims JR, Egan MF. Cognitive outcomes in trials of two BACE inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2020 Nov;16(11):1483-1492. doi: 10.1002/alz.12164. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

  • Egan MF, Kost J, Voss T, Mukai Y, Aisen PS, Cummings JL, Tariot PN, Vellas B, van Dyck CH, Boada M, Zhang Y, Li W, Furtek C, Mahoney E, Harper Mozley L, Mo Y, Sur C, Michelson D. Randomized Trial of Verubecestat for Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease. N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 11;380(15):1408-1420. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812840.

  • Kennedy ME, Stamford AW, Chen X, Cox K, Cumming JN, Dockendorf MF, Egan M, Ereshefsky L, Hodgson RA, Hyde LA, Jhee S, Kleijn HJ, Kuvelkar R, Li W, Mattson BA, Mei H, Palcza J, Scott JD, Tanen M, Troyer MD, Tseng JL, Stone JA, Parker EM, Forman MS. The BACE1 inhibitor verubecestat (MK-8931) reduces CNS beta-amyloid in animal models and in Alzheimer's disease patients. Sci Transl Med. 2016 Nov 2;8(363):363ra150. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad9704.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease

Interventions

verubecestat

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DementiaBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTauopathiesNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
Organization
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

Study Officials

  • Medical Director

    Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2013

First Posted

October 1, 2013

Study Start

November 5, 2013

Primary Completion

April 17, 2018

Study Completion

April 17, 2018

Last Updated

May 17, 2019

Results First Posted

May 17, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-05