NCT01739348

Brief Summary

This study consists of two parts, Part I and Part II. The purpose of Part I of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of verubecestat (MK-8931) compared with placebo administered for 78 weeks in the treatment of Alzheimer's Disease (AD). The primary study hypotheses for Part I are that at least one verubecestat dose is superior to placebo at 78 weeks of treatment with respect to change from baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) score and that at least one verubecestat dose is superior to placebo at 78 weeks of treatment with respect to change from baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL) score. The first approximately 400 participants entering Part I of the study are identified as the Safety Cohort. Participants who complete Part I of the study may choose to participate in Part II, which is a long term double-blind extension to assess efficacy and safety of verubecestat administered for up to an additional 260 weeks.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2,211

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2012

Typical duration for phase_2

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 29, 2012

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 30, 2012

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 3, 2012

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 14, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 14, 2017

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 16, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

October 24, 2018

Status Verified

September 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4.4 years

First QC Date

November 29, 2012

Results QC Date

April 11, 2018

Last Update Submit

September 24, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • [Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score

    Least squares mean change from baseline at week 78 was assessed for the ADAS-Cog score. ADAS-Cog measures cognition by assessing 11 metrics impaired in Alzheimer's Disease (AD): speech; speech comprehension; word finding; word recall; object/finger naming; orientation; obeying commands; ideational praxis; constructional praxis; word recognition; and remembering instruction. For each metric, scores range from 0 (no impairment) to (depending on the metric) either 5 (8 metrics), 8, 10, or 12 (1 metric each); higher scores indicate more severe impairment. Individual scores sum to a total ADAS-Cog score, ranging from 0-70. Higher total scores indicate greater cognitive impairment and AD severity. Further, increases in AD severity over time would be reflected by increases in ADAS-Cog score.

    Baseline and week 78

  • [Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Score

    Least squares mean change from baseline at week 78 was assessed for the ADCS-ADL score. The ADCS-ADL score measures the performance of activities of daily living, calculated from a 24-question survey. For each of the 24 questions, scores range from 0 (no independence) to (depending on the question) either 2 (1 question), 3 (17 questions), 4 (5 questions), or 5 (1 question), with higher scores indicating greater independence in activity performance. Scores from individual questions are summed into a total ADCS-ADL score, with total scores ranging from 0 to 78. Lower scores indicate less independence in activity performance and, as a result, greater AD severity. Further, increases in AD severity over time would be reflected by decreases in ADCS-ADL score.

    Baseline and week 78

  • [Part II (Extension Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Score

    Mean change from baseline at week 104 was assessed for the ADAS-Cog score. ADAS-Cog measures cognition by assessing 11 metrics impaired in Alzheimer's Disease (AD): speech; speech comprehension; word finding; word recall; object/finger naming; orientation; obeying commands; ideational praxis; constructional praxis; word recognition; and remembering instruction. For each metric, scores range from 0 (no impairment) to (depending on the metric) either 5 (8 metrics), 8, 10, or 12 (1 metric each); higher scores indicate more severe impairment. Individual scores sum to a total ADAS-Cog score, ranging from 0-70. Higher total scores indicate greater cognitive impairment and AD severity. Further, increases in AD severity over time would be reflected by increases in ADAS-Cog score. Per study protocol, the baseline measurement to be used was the baseline measurement obtained in Part I.

    Baseline and week 104

  • [Part II (Extension Study)] Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Score

    Mean change from baseline at week 104 was assessed for the ADCS-ADL score. The ADCS-ADL score measures the performance of activities of daily living, calculated from a 24-question survey. For each of the 24 questions, scores range from 0 (no independence) to (depending on the question) either 2 (1 question), 3 (17 questions), 4 (5 questions), or 5 (1 question), with higher scores indicating greater independence in activity performance. Scores from individual questions are summed into a total ADCS-ADL score, with total scores ranging from 0 to 78. Lower scores indicate less independence in activity performance and, as a result, greater AD severity. Further, increases in AD severity over time would be reflected by decreases in ADCS-ADL score. Per study protocol, the baseline measurement to be used was the baseline measurement obtained in Part I.

    Baseline and week 104

  • [Part I (Base Study)] Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event

    The number of participants experiencing an adverse event (AE) in Part I was assessed. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.

    Up to week 80 (up to 2 weeks following cessation of study treatment in Part I)

  • [Part II (Extension Study)] Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event

    The number of participants experiencing an adverse event (AE) in Part II was assessed. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.

    From week 78 (end of treatment in Part I) up to week 262 of Part II

  • [Part I (Base Study)] Number of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event

    The number of participants discontinuing from study drug due to an AE in Part I was assessed. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.

    Up to week 78

  • [Part II (Extension Study)] Number of Participants Who Discontinued From Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event

    The number of participants discontinuing from study drug due to an AE in Part II was assessed. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to this medicinal product. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.

    From week 78 (end of treatment in Part I) up to week 260 of Part II

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • [Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score

    Baseline and week 78

  • [Part I (Base Study)] Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hippocampal Volume (THV)

    Baseline and week 78

  • [Part I (Base Study)] Fold Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Total Tau

    Baseline and week 78

  • [Part I (Base Study)] Change From Baseline in Cortical Amyloid Load Assessed by [18F]Flutemetamol PET Standard Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR)

    Baseline and week 78

  • [Part I (Base Study)] Percentage of Participants Achieving Responder Status

    Week 78

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II]

EXPERIMENTAL

\[Part I\] Verubecestat 12 mg once daily for 78 weeks in Study Part I (Base Study). \[Part II\] Participants completing Study Part I and continuing to Study Part II (Extension Study) receive Verubecestat 12 mg once daily for an additional 260 weeks.

Drug: Verubecestat (Part I and Part II)

Arm B. Verubecestat 40 mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II]

EXPERIMENTAL

\[Part I\] Verubecestat 40 mg once daily for 78 weeks in Study Part I (Base Study). \[Part II\] Participants completing Study Part I and continuing to Study Part II (Extension Study) receive Verubecestat 40 mg once daily for an additional 260 weeks.

Drug: Verubecestat (Part I and Part II)

Arm C. Verubecestat 60mg/40mg [Part I]; 40 mg [Part II]

EXPERIMENTAL

\[Part I\] Verubecestat 60 mg once daily until the first IA in Study Part I (Base Study). Following IA, participants in this group were switched to Verubecestat 40 mg once daily, for the remainder of Study Part I (total dosing period: 78 weeks). \[Part II\] Participants completing Study Part I and continuing to Study Part II (Extension Study) receive Verubecestat 40 mg once daily for an additional 260 weeks.

Drug: Verubecestat (Part I and Part II)

Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II]

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

\[Part I\] Placebo once daily for 78 weeks in Study Part I (Base Study). \[Part II\] Participants completing Study Part I and continuing to Study Part II (Extension Study) receive Verubecestat 40 mg once daily for an additional 260 weeks.

Drug: Placebo (Part I)Drug: Verubecestat (Part II)

Interventions

Single 12 mg verubecestat tablet once daily, taken orally

Also known as: SCH 900931
Arm A. Verubecestat 12 mg [Part I]; 12 mg [Part II]

Single placebo tablet matching verubecestat treatment once daily, taken orally

Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II]

Single 40 mg verubecestat tablet once daily, taken orally

Also known as: SCH 900931
Arm D. Placebo [Part I]; Verubecestat 40 mg [Part II]

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of probable AD based on both a) the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke/Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria and b) the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for AD
  • AD is of mild to moderate severity
  • Clear history of cognitive and functional decline over at least one year that is either a) documented in medical records or b) documented by history from an informant who knows the subject well
  • Able to read at a 6th grade level or equivalent, and must have a history of academic achievement and/or employment sufficient to exclude mental retardation
  • If a participant is receiving an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, memantine, medical food/supplement (e.g., vitamin E) and/or herbal medications for AD, the dose must have been stable for at least three months before Screening, and the participant must be willing to remain on the same dose for the duration of the trial. Participants may need to be on AD treatments in accordance with local requirements
  • Participant must have a reliable and competent trial partner/caregiver who must have a close relationship with the subject
  • Tolerated study drug and completed the initial 78-week period of the trial (Part I)
  • Participant must have a reliable and competent trial partner who must have a close relationship with the subject

You may not qualify if:

  • History of stroke
  • Evidence of a neurological disorder other than the disease being studied (i.e., probable AD)
  • History of seizures or epilepsy within the last 5 years before Screening
  • Evidence of a clinically relevant or unstable psychiatric disorder, excluding major depression in remission
  • Participant is at imminent risk of self-harm or of harm to others
  • History of alcoholism or drug dependency/abuse within the last 5 years before Screening
  • Participant does not have a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan obtained within 12 months of Screening and is unwilling or not eligible to undergo an MRI scan at the Screening Visit. With Sponsor approval, a head computed tomography (CT) scan may be substituted for MRI scan to evaluate eligibility
  • History of hepatitis or liver disease that has been active within the six months prior to Screening Visit
  • History or current evidence of long QT syndrome, corrected QT (QTc) interval ≥470 milliseconds (for male subjects) or ≥480 milliseconds (for female subjects), or torsades de pointes
  • History of malignancy occurring within the five years before Screening, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, or localized prostate carcinoma; or malignancy which has been treated with potentially curative therapy with no evidence of recurrence for ≥3 year post-therapy
  • Clinically significant vitamin B12 or folate deficiency in the six months before Screening Visit
  • Use of any investigational drugs within 30 days (or longer depending on drug) before Screening or participation in studies involving repeated cognitive testing within 30 days before Screening. Participation in an observational study, such as those involving annual cognitive assessments and/or neuroimaging, may be allowed if approved by Sponsor
  • History of a hypersensitivity reaction to more than three drugs
  • Has tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Close family member (including the caregiver, the spouse or any children) who is among the personnel of the investigational or sponsor staff directly involved with this trial
  • +6 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (7)

  • Sur C, Adamczuk K, Scott D, Kost J, Sampat M, Buckley C, Farrar G, Newton B, Suhy J, Bennacef I, Egan MF. Evaluation of 18F-flutemetamol amyloid PET image analysis parameters on the effect of verubecestat on brain amlyoid load in Alzheimer's disease. Mol Imaging Biol. 2022 Dec;24(6):862-873. doi: 10.1007/s11307-022-01735-z. Epub 2022 Jul 7.

  • Dockendorf MF, Jaworowicz D, Humphrey R, Anderson M, Breidinger S, Ma L, Taylor T, Dupre N, Jones C, Furtek C, Kantesaria B, Bateman KP, Woolf E, Egan MF, Stone JA. A Model-Based Approach to Bridging Plasma and Dried Blood Spot Concentration Data for Phase 3 Verubecestat Trials. AAPS J. 2022 Apr 6;24(3):53. doi: 10.1208/s12248-022-00682-5.

  • Sur C, Kost J, Scott D, Adamczuk K, Fox NC, Cummings JL, Tariot PN, Aisen PS, Vellas B, Voss T, Mahoney E, Mukai Y, Kennedy ME, Lines C, Michelson D, Egan MF. BACE inhibition causes rapid, regional, and non-progressive volume reduction in Alzheimer's disease brain. Brain. 2020 Dec 1;143(12):3816-3826. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa332.

  • Sergott RC, Raji A, Kost J, Sur C, Jackson S, Locco A, Patel A, Furtek C, Mattson B, Egan MF. Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography Metrics Are Unchanged in Verubecestat Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trial but Correlate with Baseline Regional Brain Atrophy. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;79(1):275-287. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200735.

  • Egan MF, Mukai Y, Voss T, Kost J, Stone J, Furtek C, Mahoney E, Cummings JL, Tariot PN, Aisen PS, Vellas B, Lines C, Michelson D. Further analyses of the safety of verubecestat in the phase 3 EPOCH trial of mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019 Aug 7;11(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13195-019-0520-1.

  • Egan MF, Kost J, Tariot PN, Aisen PS, Cummings JL, Vellas B, Sur C, Mukai Y, Voss T, Furtek C, Mahoney E, Harper Mozley L, Vandenberghe R, Mo Y, Michelson D. Randomized Trial of Verubecestat for Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 3;378(18):1691-1703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706441.

  • Kennedy ME, Stamford AW, Chen X, Cox K, Cumming JN, Dockendorf MF, Egan M, Ereshefsky L, Hodgson RA, Hyde LA, Jhee S, Kleijn HJ, Kuvelkar R, Li W, Mattson BA, Mei H, Palcza J, Scott JD, Tanen M, Troyer MD, Tseng JL, Stone JA, Parker EM, Forman MS. The BACE1 inhibitor verubecestat (MK-8931) reduces CNS beta-amyloid in animal models and in Alzheimer's disease patients. Sci Transl Med. 2016 Nov 2;8(363):363ra150. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad9704.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease

Interventions

verubecestat

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DementiaBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTauopathiesNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
Organization
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp

Study Officials

  • Medical Director

    Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2012

First Posted

December 3, 2012

Study Start

November 30, 2012

Primary Completion

April 14, 2017

Study Completion

April 14, 2017

Last Updated

October 24, 2018

Results First Posted

May 16, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

https://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

More information