Intervention to Promote Survivor Resilience and Adjustment: Efficacy Evaluation
2 other identifiers
interventional
164
1 country
1
Brief Summary
- 1.To evaluate the short and longer-term efficacy of a structured outpatient intervention program (The Resilience and Adjustment Intervention, RAI) to improve survivors' resilience.
- 2.To evaluate the impact of treatment on emotional well-being and postinjury adjustment.
- 3.To evaluate the impact of the intervention on abilities including problem solving, communication, and stress management.
- 4.To examine the extent to which treatment benefits are sustained in the longer-term.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 21, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 5, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2017
CompletedOctober 6, 2017
October 1, 2017
3.8 years
August 21, 2013
October 5, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10 (CD-RISC-10)
During the past decade, researchers have developed resilience measurement scales, and a recent review suggested that Connor and Davidson have been most successful. The authors first developed a 25 item scale (CD-RISC) reflecting resilience characteristics identified by Kobasa and Rutter. Normative studies including factor analyses indicated that the CD-RISC is reliable, valid, and sensitive to treatment effects. More recently, a 10-item version was developed using exploratory and confirmatory factors analyses. Respondents are presented with a series of descriptors (e.g., "I am able to adapt and change," "Coping with stress can strengthen me") and rate themselves on a 0 - 4 scale ranging from rarely true (0) to true nearly all the time (4). Campbell-Sills and colleagues have characterized the 10-item version, to be used in the present study, as demonstrating excellent psychometric properties, namely reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity.
Change from Baseline to Post-Treatment (5 weeks after Baseline)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4)
Change from Baseline to Post-Treatment (5 weeks after Baseline)
Study Arms (2)
Resilience/Adjustment Counseling
EXPERIMENTALIntervention to promote resilience and adjustment (RAI) - The RAI was developed based upon considerable clinical experience and research review. The RAI is a structured approach to helping individuals after brain injury address issues related to resilience and adjustment to injury. The RAI is implemented in seven, 60-minute, in-person sessions.
Waitlist Control
NO INTERVENTIONIndividuals are randomly assigned to the treatment group or waitlist control (WLC) group. Individuals will complete the study measures on 2 occasions, 5 weeks apart. In fairness, WLC participants will then be offered the opportunity to participate in the intervention.
Interventions
Intervention to promote individual's resilience and adjustment (RAI) - The RAI is a structured approach to helping individuals after brain injury address issues related to resilience and adjustment. The RAI is implemented in seven sessions. Each session is in-person and lasts for 60 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- mild, moderate, or severe TBI
- able to understand and provide consent
You may not qualify if:
- active substance abusers (e.g., intoxicated at arrival to intake)
- at imminent risk of psychiatric hospitalization
- in imminent danger of hurting themselves or others
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeffrey S Kreutzer, PhD
Professor, Virginia Commonwealth University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 21, 2013
First Posted
September 5, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
October 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 30, 2017
Last Updated
October 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10