Improving Communication About Serious Illness
ICSI
Health System Intervention to Improve Communication About End-of-Life Care for Vulnerable Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
817
1 country
6
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to improve care delivered to patients with serious illness by enhancing communication among patients, families, and clinicians in the outpatient setting. We are testing a new way to help patients share their preferences for talking about end-of-life care with their clinicians and families. To do this we created a simple, short feedback form. The form is designed to help clinicians understand what patients would like to talk about. The goal of this research study is to show that using a feedback form is possible and can be helpful for patients and their families.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 28, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 2, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 11, 2019
CompletedMarch 20, 2019
March 1, 2019
3.3 years
August 28, 2013
November 28, 2017
March 7, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Occurrence of Discussion About Goals of Care at Target Visit
Patient's response to question, "Did you discuss with this doctor the kind of medical care you would want if you were too sick to speak for yourself?"
2 weeks after target visit
Secondary Outcomes (29)
Occurrence of Discussion About Goals of Care at Target Visit
Target visit
Occurrence of Discussion About Goals of Care at Target Visit Among Patients Who Did Not Object to Future Discussion at Baseline
2 weeks after target visit
Occurrence of Discussion About Goals of Care at Target Visit Among Patients Who Did Not Object to Future Discussion at Baseline
Target visit
Goal-Concordant Care
3 months after target visit
Goal-Concordant Care Among Patients With Stable Treatment Preference
3 months after target visit
- +24 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Group Differences - Treatment Preference (Adjustment Variable for Outcome Measuring Goal-concordant Care)
3 months after target visit
Group Differences - Stable Treatment Preference (Filter for Subgroup Analysis of Goal-concordant Care)
3 months after target visit
Study Arms (2)
Feedback Group
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will complete surveys and assessments and will be given the Communication Feedback Form for Patients with Serious Illness to use prior to and during a target outpatient visit.
Comparison/Usual Care Group
NO INTERVENTIONSubjects will only complete surveys and assessments.
Interventions
The intervention, based on self-efficacy theory, identifies patients' preferences for communication about end-of-life care (EOLC) and barriers and facilitators to this communication, and collates these data into a feedback form. The feedback forms are tailored to each recipient (clinician, patient, family) to support the communication tasks which that recipient will address. Feedback forms are sent to participants prior to the target clinic visit. The primary clinician's form suggests referral to palliative care if there are "potentially unmet palliative-care communication needs." All forms include "tips" to help the recipient respond to communication preferences appropriately.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eligible primary clinicians will include all clinicians who provide ongoing primary or specialty care to eligible patient populations. This will include primary care physicians (family medicine and internal medicine), oncologists, pulmonologists, cardiologists, gastroenterologists, nephrologists, neurologists, hepatologists, and geriatricians. Primary clinicians may also include nurse practitioners and physician assistants playing a "primary role" with eligible patients. A "primary role" denotes any clinician for whom having a discussion about end-of-life care with eligible patients would be indicated
- Eligible interprofessional team members will include nurses, social workers and other clinicians who are part of an enrolled primary clinician's clinic team.
- Eligible patients will be those under the care of a participating clinician who are 18 years of age or older, have had 2 or more visits with the primary clinician in the last 18 months, and meet diagnostic criteria. Diagnostic criteria include: 1) metastatic cancer or inoperable lung cancer; 2) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with FEV1 values \<35% predicted or oxygen dependence or restrictive lung disease with a TLC \< 50% predicted; 3) New York Heart Association Class III or IV heart failure; 4) Child's Class C cirrhosis or MELD score of \>17; 5) dialysis-dependent renal failure and either diabetes or a serum albumin of \< 2.5; or, 6) older than 75 years with at least one life-limiting chronic illness or older than 90 years. Additional criteria include: PAH w. 6MWD \<250m, restrictive lung disease (IPF, ILD) w/ TLC \<50%, and cystic fibrosis with FEV1 \< 30%. Eligible patients will also be English-speaking and have no significant dementia or cognitive impairment that would limit his/her ability to complete questionnaires.
- Eligible family members will be identified by the patient, with the criterion that the patient would want the family member involved in medical decision-making for the patient if he/she was not able. For the purpose of this study, "family member" is not confined to legal next-of-kin or immediate family member. Any family member, friend, or caregiver is eligible who is English-speaking and has no dementia or delirium limiting his/her ability to complete questionnaires.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Valley Medical Center
Renton, Washington, 98058, United States
Harborview Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98122, United States
Northwest Hospital and Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98133, United States
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
UW Neighborhood Clinics
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
Related Publications (9)
Au DH, Udris EM, Engelberg RA, Diehr PH, Bryson CL, Reinke LF, Curtis JR. A randomized trial to improve communication about end-of-life care among patients with COPD. Chest. 2012 Mar;141(3):726-735. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0362. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
PMID: 21940765BACKGROUNDKnauft E, Nielsen EL, Engelberg RA, Patrick DL, Curtis JR. Barriers and facilitators to end-of-life care communication for patients with COPD. Chest. 2005 Jun;127(6):2188-96. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.6.2188.
PMID: 15947336BACKGROUNDCurtis JR, Patrick DL. Barriers to communication about end-of-life care in AIDS patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Dec;12(12):736-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07158.x.
PMID: 9436892BACKGROUNDCurtis JR, Engelberg RA, Nielsen EL, Au DH, Patrick DL. Patient-physician communication about end-of-life care for patients with severe COPD. Eur Respir J. 2004 Aug;24(2):200-5. doi: 10.1183/09031936.04.00010104.
PMID: 15332385BACKGROUNDEngelberg R, Downey L, Curtis JR. Psychometric characteristics of a quality of communication questionnaire assessing communication about end-of-life care. J Palliat Med. 2006 Oct;9(5):1086-98. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.1086.
PMID: 17040146BACKGROUNDCurtis JR, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Shannon SE, Ambrozy DM, Ramsey PG. Patients' perspectives on physician skill in end-of-life care: differences between patients with COPD, cancer, and AIDS. Chest. 2002 Jul;122(1):356-62. doi: 10.1378/chest.122.1.356.
PMID: 12114382BACKGROUNDCoats H, Downey L, Sharma RK, Curtis JR, Engelberg RA. Quality of Communication and Trust in Patients With Serious Illness: An Exploratory Study of the Relationships of Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Religiosity. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Oct;56(4):530-540.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
PMID: 30025937DERIVEDCurtis JR, Downey L, Back AL, Nielsen EL, Paul S, Lahdya AZ, Treece PD, Armstrong P, Peck R, Engelberg RA. Effect of a Patient and Clinician Communication-Priming Intervention on Patient-Reported Goals-of-Care Discussions Between Patients With Serious Illness and Clinicians: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jul 1;178(7):930-940. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2317.
PMID: 29802770DERIVEDFakhri S, Engelberg RA, Downey L, Nielsen EL, Paul S, Lahdya AZ, Treece PD, Curtis JR. Factors Affecting Patients' Preferences for and Actual Discussions About End-of-Life Care. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Sep;52(3):386-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.03.012. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
PMID: 27265813DERIVED
Related Links
- Click here for more information about this study. PCORI Project Summary: Health System Intervention to Improve Communication about End-of-Life Care for Vulnerable Patients
- The End-of-Life Care Research Program at the UW School of Medicine
- The Palliative Care Center of Excellence at the University of Washington
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study took place in one region of the US and may not generalize to other regions. There may be selection bias among those clinicians and patients who were willing to participate.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. J. Randall Curtis
- Organization
- University of Washington
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
J. Randall Curtis, MD, MPH
University of Washington
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2013
First Posted
September 2, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 20, 2019
Results First Posted
February 11, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share