Facilitating Communication Study
FCS2
Evaluating Effectiveness of a Communication Facilitator to Reduce Distress and Improve Goal Concordant Care for Critically Ill Patients and Their Families: A Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
977
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This study is a randomized clinical trial of an intervention to improve outcomes for patients and their family by using ICU nurse facilitators to support, model, and teach communication strategies that enable patients and their families to secure care in line with patients' goals of care over an illness trajectory, beginning in the ICU and continuing to care in the community.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 26, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 17, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 26, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 7, 2025
CompletedFebruary 7, 2025
February 1, 2025
4.5 years
October 16, 2018
October 24, 2024
February 5, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Depression Symptoms, Family (HADS-D)
Family member symptoms of depression and anxiety assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The HADS is a reliable and valid 14-item, 2-domain (anxiety and depression) tool used to assess symptoms of psychological distress. Seven items evaluate anxiety and seven evaluate depression. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (ranging from 0-3. For each of three follow-up points (1-month, 3-month, and 6-month), the response variable was the sum of 7 items measuring depression, weighted for the number of items with valid responses. The sum could range from 0 to 21, with higher values indicating greater depression (i.e., worse outcome),
1-month, 3-month, and 6-month values for the outcome, using a linear mixed-effects model that evaluates the effects of the intervention, time point, and the intervention-time interaction on the outcome after adjustment for the baseline value
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Anxiety Symptoms, Family (HADS-A)
1-month, 3-month, and 6-month values for the outcome, using a linear mixed-effects model that evaluates the effects of the intervention, time point, and the intervention-time interaction on the outcome after adjustment for the baseline value
Quality of Family Experience - Relationship With Healthcare Providers (QUAL-E Fam)
1-month, 3-month, and 6-month values for the outcome, using a linear mixed-effects model that evaluates the effects of the intervention, time point, and the intervention-time interaction on the outcome after adjustment for the baseline value
Quality of Family Experience - Sense of Completion (QUAL-E Fam)
1-month, 3-month, and 6-month values for the outcome, using a linear mixed-effects model that evaluates the effects of the intervention, time point, and the intervention-time interaction on the outcome after adjustment for the baseline value
Quality of Family Experience - Preparation Issues (QUAL-E Fam)
1-month, 3-month, and 6-month values for the outcome, using a linear mixed-effects model that evaluates the effects of the intervention, time point, and the intervention-time interaction on the outcome after adjustment for the baseline value
Goal-Concordant Care, Family Assessment
1-month, 3-month, and 6-month values for the outcome, using a linear mixed-effects model that evaluates the effects of the intervention, time point, and the intervention-time interaction on the outcome after adjustment for the baseline value
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (6)
Perceived Competence Scale (PCS), 1 Month - Family
Assessed on 1-month questionnaires
Perceived Competence Scale (PCS), 3 Months - Family
Assessed on 3-month questionnaires
Perceived Competence Scale (PCS), 6 Months - Family
Assessed on 6-month questionnaires
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Facilitator-Based Intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe 'Facilitator-Based Intervention' includes patient and family member subjects.
Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONThe 'Usual Care' arm includes patient and family member subjects.
Interventions
Facilitators interact in person or by telephone with patients, family, and clinicians both during and following the patient's ICU stay for 3 months. In-person contacts include visits to patients' homes and/or care facilities; phone contacts include calls to patients, families and clinicians. Patients and families have access to facilitators through phone and email 5 days per week. Facilitators may attend clinic visits with patients. In addition to checking directly with patients/families during regular contacts, facilitators also access the electronic health record to ensure they have accurate information about appointments and treatment plans and to document key points for the clinical team. Facilitators encourage referral to inpatient or outpatient palliative care services when needs are identified.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- PATIENTS. Eligible patients 18 years of age or older, English-speaking, with a chronic life-limiting illness suggesting a median survival of approximately 2 years or a severe acute illness with a risk of hospital mortality of at least 15%. Chronic life-limiting illnesses include: cancer with a poor prognosis (e.g. metastatic cancer); chronic pulmonary disease (e.g. COPD, restrictive lung disease); coronary artery disease (CAD); congestive heart failure (CHF); peripheral vascular disease (PVD); severe liver disease (e.g. cirrhosis); diabetes with end-organ damage; renal failure (e.g. ESRD); and dementia. Acute illness criteria include a SOFA, APACHE or trauma severity score predicting a 15% or greater risk of hospital mortality. Acute illnesses and conditions also include: age \>=80 years; acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with P/F ratio \<=300; subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) Fisher grade 3/4 with Glasgow coma score (GCS) \<=12; spontaneous hemorrhage (ICH, IPH, EDH, SDH) with GCS \<=12; stroke or cardiovascular accident (CVA) with GCS \<=12; decompressive/crash craniotomy (bone flap) with GCS \<=12; traumatic brain injury (TBI) or diffuse axonal injury (DAI) based on MRI \~day 10; or anoxic brain injury due to cardiac arrest \>48 hours. All potential participants screened for facility with English and absence of significant cognitive impairment (prior to their current hospitalization) that would limit their ability to complete survey instruments.
- FAMILY. Eligible family subjects18 years of age or older, English-speaking, and identified as someone involved in patient's medical care or decision-making. Eligible family may include any of the following: legal guardians, durable power of attorney for healthcare, spouses, adult children, parents, siblings, domestic partners, other relatives, and friends.
- CLINICIAN AND ADMINISTRATOR INTERVIEW SUBJECTS. Eligible clinicians and administrators 18 years of age or older, English-speaking, employed at a participating hospital and have a familiarity with the study and the intervention.
You may not qualify if:
- PATIENTS. We will exclude patients with an anticipated ICU stay of less than 2 days, as assessed by the critical care attending physician or his/her designee. We will exclude patients who have been in the ICU for more than 14 days.
- CLINICIAN AND ADMINISTRATOR INTERVIEW SUBJECTS. n/a
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
UW Medicine - Harborview Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States
University of Washington Medical Center - Northwest
Seattle, Washington, 98133, United States
University of Washington Medical Center - Montlake
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study took place in one region of the US and may not generalize to other regions. There may be selection bias among those family members and patients who were willing to participate.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Ruth Engelberg
- Organization
- University of Washington
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ruth A Engelberg, PhD
University of Washington
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 16, 2018
First Posted
October 26, 2018
Study Start
April 17, 2019
Primary Completion
October 26, 2023
Study Completion
June 30, 2024
Last Updated
February 7, 2025
Results First Posted
February 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share