Chronic Aphasia - Improved by Intensive Training and Electrical Brain Stimulation (CATS)
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if non-invasive electrical brain stimulation can enhance the outcome of intensive language therapy in chronic aphasia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Jan 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 14, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 16, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedFebruary 4, 2015
February 1, 2015
4.9 years
August 14, 2013
February 3, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
naming performance
Change of naming score from baseline (day 1 of study) to immediately after 2-week intervention period (post-testing)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
naming performance
Change of naming score from post-testing (after end of intervention) to 3 months after the intervention (follow-up)
Naming performance during functional magnetic resonance scanning
Change of naming score from baseline (day 1 of study) to immediately after 2-week intervention period (post-testing)
Naming performance during functional magnetic resonance imaging
Change of naming score from post-testing (after end of intervention) to 3 months after the intervention (follow-up)
Changes on the Amsterdam Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (ANELT)
Change of naming score from baseline (day 1 of study) to immediately after 2-week intervention period (post-testing)
Changes on the Amsterdam Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (ANELT)
Change of naming score from post-testing (after end of intervention) to 3 months after the intervention (follow-up)
Study Arms (2)
anodal tDCS
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntensive language therapy with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation
sham tDCS
SHAM COMPARATORIntensive language therapy with Sham-tDCS
Interventions
2 weeks of daily computerized naming training, daily, 3 hours
1mA anodal over M1 primary motor cortex for 20min with 35cm/2 electrode, Cathode (100cm/2) contralateral
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- chronic stroke (\> 1 year after event)
- aphasia due to stroke with naming impairment
- German as first language
- first-ever stroke
You may not qualify if:
- more than 1 stroke
- history of severe alcohol or drug abuse, psychiatric illnesses like severe depression, poor motivational capacity
- dementia
- contraindications for Magnetic Resonance Imaging or transcranial direct current stimulation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Charite
Berlin, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Agnes Floeel, Prof MD
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 14, 2013
First Posted
August 16, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 4, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-02