Pelvic Area Extension Measurements for Four Types of Lumbopelvic Balance Using Three Different Methods
CRESPEOS
Comparison and Reproducibility of Pelvic Area Extension Measurements for Four Types of Lumbopelvic Balance Using Three Different Methods: Clinical Observation Versus Photography Versus the EOS Imaging System
2 other identifiers
interventional
120
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to describe for the first time the expansion reserve of the pelvic area (measurements using the EOS system) for each of the four morphotypes (Roussouly classification) commonly found in a population of healthy volunteers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2015
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 26, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 25, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 25, 2016
CompletedDecember 22, 2025
May 1, 2016
1.3 years
July 18, 2013
December 16, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
EOS measurement of intrinsic reserve extension = angular variation of the sacral slope (left and right sides)
= RIEeos
baseline (day 0)
EOS measurement of extrinsic extension reserve
= REEeos = angular variation of a specific angle (line joining the center of the sacral plate and the midpoint of the segment involving the center of the femoral head and the line joining this point to the top of the intercondylar knee notch) (left and right sides)
Baseline (day 0)
EOS measurement of global extension reserve
= RIEeos + REEeos (left and right sides)
Baseline (day 0)
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Goniometric measurement of global extension reserve
baseline (day 0)
Photographic measurement of global extension reserve
baseline (day 0)
Roussouly classification: 1, 2, 3 or 4
baseline (day 0)
Pelvic incidence (°)
Baseline (day 0)
Standing sacral slope at rest
Baseline (day 0)
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
The study population.
EXPERIMENTALHealthy volunteers 20 to 40 years of age. Intervention: Goniometric measure of pelvic extension reserve. Intervention: Photographic measure of pelvic extension reserve. Intervention: EOS measure of pelvic extension reserve.
Interventions
The pelvic extension reserve (°) is measured via goniometry. The goniometric measurements will be taken once by an investigator on all subjects and once by a different investigator on half of the subjects (with balanced distribution of morphotypes).
The pelvic extension reserve (°) is measured using photography. Photographic measurements will be performed twice one investigator and 1 time by a different investigator (total of three measurements).
The pelvic extension reserve (°) is measured using the imaging system EOS. Five X-rays will be made for each volunteer on the EOS system. The first is a frontal shot in a bipedal position, reference snapshot for verifying the absence of spinal deformity or hip pathology. The second and third are profile shots, one on the left and one on the right, whole body, bipedal position; serving as a reference picture. The fourth is profile shot, whole body, with the left hip in hyperextension. For maximum left hip hyperextension, the right leg rests on a step of varying height, and the hip is maximally flexed. The fifth is a profile shot, full body, with the right hip in hyperextension. For a maximum right hip hyperextension, the left leg rests on a step of varying height, and the hip is maximally flexed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The healthy volunteer must have given his/her informed and signed consent
- The healthy volunteer must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
You may not qualify if:
- The healthy volunteer is participating in another study
- The healthy volunteer is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
- The healthy volunteer refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to correctly inform the healthy volunteer
- The healthy volunteer is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
- The healthy volunteers had a history of chronic pain or surgery at the hip, the thoracolumbar spine or the sacroiliac area
- The healthy volunteer has a hip, knee or ankle abnormality
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Lapeyronie
Montpellier, 34295, France
CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
Nîmes, 30029, France
Related Publications (1)
Kouyoumdjian P, Mansour J, Haignere V, Demattei C, Maury E, George D, Coulomb R. Hip-Spine Relationship between Sagittal Balance of the Lumbo-Pelvi-Femoral Complex and Hip Extension Capacity: An EOS Evaluation in a Healthy Caucasian Population. Global Spine J. 2024 Jan;14(1):265-271. doi: 10.1177/21925682221103831. Epub 2022 May 23.
PMID: 35604878RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pascal Kouyoumdjian, MD, PhD
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2013
First Posted
July 26, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
April 25, 2016
Study Completion
April 25, 2016
Last Updated
December 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2016-05