Study Stopped
slow recruitment and poor follow up
Total vs. Reverse Shoulder Replacement: Pain Relief Two Years After Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
19
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Specific Aim: To compare early postoperative pain relief in patients over the age of 70 who undergo either Total Shoulder Arthroplasty or Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Hypothesis: Early postoperative pain relief will be greater in those undergoing Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 12, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 28, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 5, 2018
CompletedDecember 5, 2018
November 1, 2018
2.2 years
June 12, 2013
May 8, 2017
November 5, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
ASES Score
American Shoulder \& Elbow Survey (ASES): Assessment of patient-rated shoulder pain and function/disability. Questions involve activities of daily living that reflect the use of the shoulder \& elbow in different planes of motion. Pain and weakness with various activities are also addressed. ASES score will be calculated, compared and reported for both groups pre-operatively and 2 years post operatively: (17 patients) total arthroplasty and (17 patients) reverse arthroplasty.
2 years after shoulder replacement
WOOS Score
a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument (Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder \[WOOS\]. WOOS Score will be generated for both groups pre-operatively and 2 years post operatively: Reverse arthroplasty(17 patients) and Total arthroplasty (17 patients) Study has been discontinued
2 years after shoulder replacement
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Shoulder Strength and Motion Based on Physican Examination
2 years post shoulder replacement
Study Arms (2)
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
ACTIVE COMPARATORShoulder Joint Replacement Reverse Arthroplasty Implant to surgically replace arthritic shoulder
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
ACTIVE COMPARATORShoulder Joint Replacement Total Arthroplasty Implant used to surgically replace osteoarthritic shoulder joint
Interventions
REVERSE In a Reverse Total shoulder the ball is located on the shoulder blade (glenoid) and the socket is located on the arm bone (humerus), exactly the opposite of the situation in a conventional total shoulder. The ball (glenosphere) is screwed to the bone of the shoulder blade. The cup (humeral sock¬et) is fixed to a stem that is cemented down the inside of the arm bone (humerus).
TOTAL In a conventional Total shoulder, the arthritic surface of the ball is replaced with a metal ball with a stem that is press fit in the inside of the arm bone (humerus) and the socket is resurfaced with a component.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 70 or older,
- have radiographic signs of osteoarthritis (narrowing of the glenohumeral joint space, marginal osteophytes around the humeral head, progressive changes with sclerosis and subcortical cystic formation and flattening of the humeral head),
- intact rotator cuff but with atrophy or fatty degeneration (defined as Grade II atrophy noted on preoperative shoulder ultrasound),
- objective weakness as measured with Isobex testing,
- limited forward elevation (less than 90 degrees)
You may not qualify if:
- patients who present with pain secondary to inflammatory arthropathy,
- obvious full-thickness rotator cuff tear,
- cuff tear arthropathy,
- revision arthroplasty,
- fracture or trauma,
- patients who had previous rotator cuff repair or prior open surgery prior to shoulder arthroplasty.
- pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Washington University School of Medicinelead
- Zimmer Biometcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study was terminated due to slow enrollment and poor follow up. There is insufficient data for analysis.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Aaron Chamberlain
- Organization
- Washington University School of Medicine - Dept of Orthopaedic Surgery
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aaron Chamberlain, MD
Washington University School of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 12, 2013
First Posted
June 21, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2012
Primary Completion
January 28, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2016
Last Updated
December 5, 2018
Results First Posted
December 5, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share