Staying Positive With Arthritis Study
SPA
Staying Positive: An Intervention to Reduce Osteoarthritis Pain Disparities
1 other identifier
interventional
360
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Arthritis is a painful, disabling condition that disproportionately affects African Americans. Existing arthritis treatments yield only small to moderate improvements in pain and are not effective at reducing racial disparities in arthritis pain. According to the biopsychosocial model of pain, there is a need for novel interventions that target psychosocial factors associated with arthritis outcomes and disparities in outcomes. Evidence from the field of psychology suggests that an intervention designed to develop a positive mindset has the potential to improve pain and functioning and reduce racial disparities in patients with arthritis. Interventions to foster a positive mindset have been developed for clinical patient populations but have not yet been fully tested in patients with arthritis or in Veterans, nor have their effects on racial differences in clinical outcomes been examined. This study will address these gaps by testing the impact of an evidence-based positive activities intervention on pain and functioning in African American and White Veterans with knee arthritis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 18, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 13, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 9, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 9, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 11, 2019
CompletedApril 3, 2019
March 1, 2019
2.3 years
August 18, 2014
September 20, 2018
March 21, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Self-reported Pain From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Months Post-intervention
Pain subscale of the Western Ontario McMaster (WOMAC) Index. Pain is on a scale of 0-100; higher scores mean worse pain.
Baseline to 6 months post-intervention
Self-reported Physical Functioning From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Months Post-intervention
Difficulty with physical functioning subscale of the Western Ontario McMaster (WOMAC) Index. Physical functioning is on a scale of 0-100; higher scores mean worse physical functioning.
Baseline to 6 months post-intervention
Other Outcomes (1)
Patient Global Assessment of Pain From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Months Post-intervention
Baseline to 6 months post-intervention
Study Arms (2)
Positive Activities (PA)
EXPERIMENTALPositive Activities (PA) Program
Attention Control (AC)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAttention Control (AC) Program
Interventions
6-week program of at-home activities (1 per week) that have been shown to increase positivity. Activities were delivered via activity booklets and oral instructions provided during weekly telephone calls from trained interventionists. Interventionist oriented participants to the booklets and reviewed the first activity at the end of an in-person baseline visit. Booklets contained all instructions patients needed to complete the full program. Interventionists also provided support via weekly calls in which they assessed completion of the previous week's activity, reviewed instructions for the next activity, and helped participants trouble-shoot anticipated barriers.
6-week program of at-home activities (1 per week) based on affectively neutral activities from control conditions in studies of positive activities interventions. Activities were delivered via activity booklets and oral instructions provided during weekly telephone calls from trained interventionists. Interventionist oriented participants to the booklets and reviewed the first activity at the end of an in-person baseline visit. Booklets contained all instructions patients needed to complete the full program. Interventionists also provided support via weekly calls in which they assessed completion of the previous week's activity, reviewed instructions for the next activity, and helped participants trouble-shoot anticipated barriers.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 50 years or older
- Receive primary care at a participating study site
- Self-report as non-Hispanic black/AA or non-Hispanic WH
- Frequent, symptomatic knee pain identified using questions from the OA Initiative
- Pain level of 4 or higher on a 0-10 numeric rating scale
- Can speak, read, and write in English
You may not qualify if:
- Patients will be excluded if they:
- Report serious problems with hearing, eyesight, or memory
- Report having been diagnosed any type of arthritis other than osteoarthritis or degenerative arthritis
- Report that they have been treated for cancer in the last 3 years
- Report having had a steroid injection into one or both knees in the past 3 months
- Report having had a knee replacement into one or both knees in the past 3 months
- Report having plans to have a knee replacement in one or both knees in the next 6 months
- Report that there is a reason they cannot complete the study procedures, which include telephone calls and program activities that involve reading and writing
- Do not have a telephone number where they can receive telephone calls from research staff
- Screen positive for cognitive impairment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15240, United States
Related Publications (5)
Hausmann LRM, Ibrahim SA, Kwoh CK, Youk A, Obrosky DS, Weiner DK, Vina E, Gallagher RM, Mauro GT, Parks A. Rationale and design of the Staying Positive with Arthritis (SPA) Study: A randomized controlled trial testing the impact of a positive psychology intervention on racial disparities in pain. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Jan;64:243-253. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
PMID: 28893676BACKGROUNDHausmann LRM, Youk A, Kwoh CK, Ibrahim SA, Hannon MJ, Weiner DK, Gallagher RM, Parks A. Testing a Positive Psychological Intervention for Osteoarthritis. Pain Med. 2017 Oct 1;18(10):1908-1920. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx141.
PMID: 29044408BACKGROUNDVina ER, Hausmann LRM, Obrosky DS, Youk A, Ibrahim SA, Weiner DK, Gallagher RM, Kwoh CK. Social & psychological factors associated with oral analgesic use in knee osteoarthritis management. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Jul;27(7):1018-1025. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
PMID: 30716537RESULTMcClendon J, Essien UR, Youk A, Ibrahim SA, Vina E, Kwoh CK, Hausmann LRM. Cumulative Disadvantage and Disparities in Depression and Pain Among Veterans With Osteoarthritis: The Role of Perceived Discrimination. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Jan;73(1):11-17. doi: 10.1002/acr.24481.
PMID: 33026710DERIVEDHausmann LRM, Youk A, Kwoh CK, Gallagher RM, Weiner DK, Vina ER, Obrosky DS, Mauro GT, McInnes S, Ibrahim SA. Effect of a Positive Psychological Intervention on Pain and Functional Difficulty Among Adults With Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182533. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2533.
PMID: 30646170DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Included patients with knee osteoarthritis from 2 VA medical centers; did not assess pain conditions other than arthritis; adherence and outcomes were self-reported.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Leslie R.M. Hausmann
- Organization
- Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leslie RM Hausmann, PhD
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The statistician will seal PA and AC program workbooks in envelopes following the randomization scheme. To blind participants and staff during the baseline assessment, staff will take the next sealed envelope in the sequence to each baseline visit, to be opened after a patient has consented and completed the baseline assessment. The study staff that complete the baseline visits will be unblinded once a participant's envelope is opened; participants will not be told whether they are in the PA or AC program. Staff who conduct the weekly intervention calls in the 6 weeks following the baseline visit will also be unblinded. To maintain blinding for the collection of outcome measures, study staff members who did not complete the baseline visit or any weekly calls during the 6-week program period for a given participant will collect the 1, 3, and 6-month follow-up assessments.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 18, 2014
First Posted
August 22, 2014
Study Start
July 13, 2015
Primary Completion
November 9, 2017
Study Completion
November 9, 2017
Last Updated
April 3, 2019
Results First Posted
February 11, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share