Study Stopped
Small number of subjects
Real Time 3D Imaging and Surrogate Bone Model
Comparison of Acetabular Shell Position Using 3D Planning vs. Standard Preoperative Planning: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is an observer-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial to define the efficacy of a new technology developed at the Cleveland Clinic to improve the positioning of the acetabular shell in total hip arthroplasty.The proposed study will enroll patients that have consented to total hip arthroplasty with or without screw fixation for treatment of hip pathology. This treatment is standard of care. Patients will receive standard of care pre- and post-operative care and placement of standard of care implants all of which are commercially available and FDA approved for general use for the clinical indications used in these patients. The only difference in treatment between the groups will be the use of a surrogate bone model to help assist the surgeon visualize the ideal placement of the acetabular component. Diagnostic testing performed specifically related to this study consists of obtaining one pre-operative and one post-operative CT scan. The post-operative scan is to be performed within two weeks of surgery. The investigators predict that those patients with 3D imaging and bone model will have better acetabular shell placement than those with standard preoperative planning.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 29, 2017
CompletedMarch 29, 2017
February 1, 2017
7 months
July 28, 2014
December 20, 2016
February 15, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Acetabular Shell Version and Inclination
A CT scan of all patients will be obtained within 2 weeks of surgery to measure placement (acetabular version \& inclination measured in degrees) of the acetabular shell
within 2 weeks of surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Operative Time
time of surgery
Study Arms (2)
3D imaging, surrogate bone model
EXPERIMENTAL3D imaging \& surrogate bone model
Standard of Care Preoperative Imaging
NO INTERVENTIONPatients receiving standard of care preoperative planning prior to total hip arthroplasty.
Interventions
3D imaging \& surrogate bone model to assist with acetabular shell placement. Different that standard of care preoperative imaging
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects to be included in this protocol will be adult males and females of all races and socioeconomic status meeting the following criteria:
- Primary, unilateral Total hip arthroplasty (THA)
- to 85 years old at time of surgery
- Able to get a pre- and post-operative CT scan at the Cleveland Clinic Main Campus at least 10 days prior to surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Significant metal in the joint that results in metal artifact on the pre--operative CT scan, thereby compromising the ability to visualize the acetabulum on the pre-operative simulator.
- Pregnancy
- Incarceration
- Condition deemed by physician or medical staff to be non-conducive to patient's ability to complete the study, or a potential risk to the patient's health and well-being.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Related Publications (15)
Codsi MJ, Bennetts C, Gordiev K, Boeck DM, Kwon Y, Brems J, Powell K, Iannotti JP. Normal glenoid vault anatomy and validation of a novel glenoid implant shape. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 May-Jun;17(3):471-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.08.010. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
PMID: 18328741BACKGROUNDScalise JJ, Bryan J, Polster J, Brems JJ, Iannotti JP. Quantitative analysis of glenoid bone loss in osteoarthritis using three-dimensional computed tomography scans. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;17(2):328-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.013. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
PMID: 18218326BACKGROUNDScalise JJ, Codsi MJ, Bryan J, Iannotti JP. The three-dimensional glenoid vault model can estimate normal glenoid version in osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 May-Jun;17(3):487-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.09.006. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
PMID: 18282721BACKGROUNDScalise JJ, Codsi MJ, Bryan J, Brems JJ, Iannotti JP. The influence of three-dimensional computed tomography images of the shoulder in preoperative planning for total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov;90(11):2438-45. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01341.
PMID: 18978413BACKGROUNDEisler T, Svensson O, Tengstrom A, Elmstedt E. Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jun;17(4):457-62. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.31245.
PMID: 12066276BACKGROUNDFurnes O, Lie SA, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI. Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements. A review of 53,698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-99. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 May;83(4):579-86. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b4.11223.
PMID: 11380136BACKGROUNDOlder J. Charnley low-friction arthroplasty: a worldwide retrospective review at 15 to 20 years. J Arthroplasty. 2002 Sep;17(6):675-80. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.31973.
PMID: 12216018BACKGROUNDPhillips CB, Barrett JA, Losina E, Mahomed NN, Lingard EA, Guadagnoli E, Baron JA, Harris WH, Poss R, Katz JN. Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85(1):20-6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00004.
PMID: 12533567BACKGROUNDParvizi J, Wade FA, Rapuri V, Springer BD, Berry DJ, Hozack WJ. Revision hip arthroplasty for late instability secondary to polyethylene wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jun;447:66-9. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218751.14989.a6.
PMID: 16672896BACKGROUNDAlberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty : an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Oct;84(10):1788-92.
PMID: 12377909BACKGROUNDDorr LD, Wolf AW, Chandler R, Conaty JP. Classification and treatment of dislocations of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Mar;(173):151-8.
PMID: 6825326BACKGROUNDMcCollum DE, Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Dec;(261):159-70.
PMID: 2245542BACKGROUNDRobinson RP, Simonian PT, Gradisar IM, Ching RP. Joint motion and surface contact area related to component position in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Jan;79(1):140-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b1.6842.
PMID: 9020463BACKGROUNDMahomed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN, Phillips CB, Losina E, Lew RA, Guadagnoli E, Harris WH, Poss R, Baron JA. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85(1):27-32. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00005.
PMID: 12533568BACKGROUNDHafez MA, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB, Sherman KP. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Mar;444:184-92. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000201148.06454.ef.
PMID: 16446589BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Early termination leading to small numbers of subjects analyzed
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Carlos A Higuera, MD
- Organization
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carlos Higuera, MD
The Cleveland Clinic
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Alison Klika, MS
The Cleveland Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2014
First Posted
July 30, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 29, 2017
Results First Posted
March 29, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share