Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Two Different Dosing Schedules of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Compared to Ipilimumab in Participants With Advanced Melanoma (MK-3475-006/KEYNOTE-006)
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Three-Arm, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Two Dosing Schedules of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Compared to Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma
3 other identifiers
interventional
834
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of 2 different dosing schedules of pembrolizumab (MK-3475), every 2 weeks (Q2W) and every 3 weeks (Q3W), and compare the 2 schedules to treatment with ipilimumab in ipilimumab-naïve participants with unresectable or metastatic melanoma. The primary hypotheses are that pembrolizumab is superior to ipilimumab with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Aug 2013
Longer than P75 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 28, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 31, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 28, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 3, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 14, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 3, 2019
CompletedJune 2, 2020
May 1, 2020
1.5 years
May 28, 2013
December 9, 2015
May 22, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Progression-free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by Independent Radiology Plus Oncology Review (IRO)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression, based on blinded Independent Radiology plus Oncology review (IRO) using RECIST 1.1, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was defined as a 20% or greater increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or the appearance of new lesions. The primary analysis of PFS was performed at the time of the first protocol pre-specified statistical analysis, with data cut-off of 03-Sep-2014.
Up to approximately 12 months (through first pre-specified statistical analysis cut-off date of 03-Sep-2014)
Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) at 12 Months
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. The percentage of participants with OS (OS rate) at 12 months was reported for each arm. The reported percentage was estimated using a product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data; data were censored at the date of cut-off. The primary analysis of OS was performed at the time of the second protocol pre-specified statistical analysis, with data cut-off of 03-Mar-2015.
Month 12
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Objective Response Rate (ORR) According to RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by IRO
Up to approximately 12 months (through first pre-specified statistical analysis cut-off date of 03-Sep-2014)
Study Arms (3)
Ipilimumab
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive ipilimumab, 3 mg/kg intravenously (IV), once every 3 weeks (Q3W) for a total of 4 doses (up to approximately 3 months).
Pembrolizumab Q2W
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive pembrolizumab, 10 mg/kg IV, once every 2 weeks (Q2W) for up to approximately 24 months.
Pembrolizumab Q3W
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants receive pembrolizumab, 10 mg/kg IV, Q3W for up to approximately 24 months.
Interventions
10 mg/kg IV, administered Q2W or Q3W based upon randomization.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologically-confirmed diagnosis of unresectable Stage III or metastatic melanoma not amenable to local therapy (excluding uveal or ocular melanoma)
- At least one measurable lesion
- No prior systemic treatment (excluding adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy) for melanoma (first line) or one prior systemic treatment (excluding adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy) for melanoma (second line)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1
- Archived tissue sample or new biopsy sample
- Female participants of childbearing potential must agree to use effective contraception from Visit 1 to 120 days after the last dose of study drug; male participants must agree to use an adequate method of contraception starting with the first dose of study drug through 120 days after the last dose of study drug
You may not qualify if:
- Prior treatment with ipilimumab or other anti-cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA-4) agent or any anti-programmed cell death (PD-1 or PD-L2) agent
- Chemotherapy, radioactive, or biological cancer therapy within four weeks prior to the first dose of study drug, or not recovered from adverse events caused by cancer therapeutics administered more than four weeks earlier
- Currently participating or has participated in a study of an investigational agent or using an investigational device within 30 days of the first dose of study drug
- Expected to require any other form of systemic or localized antineoplastic therapy while on study
- On any systemic steroid therapy within one week before the planned date for first dose of randomized treatment or on any other form of immunosuppressive medication
- History of a malignancy (other than the disease under treatment in the study) within 5 years prior to first study drug administration, excluding adequately treated Stage 1 or Stage 2 basal/squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast, or other in situ cancers.
- Known active central nervous system (CNS) metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis; participants with previously treated brain metastases are eligible
- Severe hypersensitivity reaction to treatment with another monoclonal antibody
- Active autoimmune disease or a documented history of autoimmune disease or syndrome that requires systemic steroids or immunosuppressive agents
- Active infection requiring systemic therapy
- Known history of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
- Known history of or positive for Hepatitis B or C
- Known psychiatric or substance abuse disorder
- Regular user (including recreational use) of illicit drugs or had a recent history (within the last year) of substance abuse (including alcohol)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive, or father children within the projected duration of the study
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (14)
Robert C,Schachter J,Long GV,Arance A,Grob JJ,Mortier L,Daud A,Carlino MS,McNeil C,Lotem M,Larkin J,Lorigan P,Neyns B,Blank CU,Hamid O,Mateus C,Shapira-Frommer R,Kosh M,Zhou H,Ibrahim N,Ebbinghaus S,Ribas A,KEYNOTE-006 investigators . Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 19; PMID: 25891173
BACKGROUNDSchachter J, Ribas A, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, Daud A, Carlino MS, McNeil C, Lotem M, Larkin J, Lorigan P, Neyns B, Blank C, Petrella TM, Hamid O, Zhou H, Ebbinghaus S, Ibrahim N, Robert C. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: final overall survival results of a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006). Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1853-1862. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31601-X. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
PMID: 28822576RESULTLong GV, Carlino MS, McNeil C, Ribas A, Gaudy-Marqueste C, Schachter J, Nyakas M, Kee D, Petrella TM, Blaustein A, Lotem M, Arance AM, Daud AI, Hamid O, Larkin J, Yao L, Singh R, Lal R, Robert C. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: 10-year follow-up of the phase III KEYNOTE-006 study. Ann Oncol. 2024 Dec;35(12):1191-1199. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.08.2330. Epub 2024 Sep 15.
PMID: 39306585DERIVEDRobert C, Carlino MS, McNeil C, Ribas A, Grob JJ, Schachter J, Nyakas M, Kee D, Petrella TM, Blaustein A, Lotem M, Arance A, Daud AI, Hamid O, Larkin J, Anderson J, Krepler C, Grebennik D, Long GV. Seven-Year Follow-Up of the Phase III KEYNOTE-006 Study: Pembrolizumab Versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug 20;41(24):3998-4003. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01599. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
PMID: 37348035DERIVEDHamid O, Robert C, Daud A, Carlino MS, Mitchell TC, Hersey P, Schachter J, Long GV, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD, Arance A, Grob JJ, Joshua AM, Weber JS, Mortier L, Jensen E, Diede SJ, Moreno BH, Ribas A. Long-term outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma who had initial stable disease with pembrolizumab in KEYNOTE-001 and KEYNOTE-006. Eur J Cancer. 2021 Nov;157:391-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.013. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
PMID: 34571336DERIVEDRobert C, Hwu WJ, Hamid O, Ribas A, Weber JS, Daud AI, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD, Mitchell TC, Hersey P, Dronca R, Joseph RW, Boutros C, Min L, Long GV, Schachter J, Puzanov I, Dummer R, Lin J, Ibrahim N, Diede SJ, Carlino MS, Joshua AM. Long-term safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy and relationship with clinical outcome: A landmark analysis in patients with advanced melanoma. Eur J Cancer. 2021 Feb;144:182-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
PMID: 33360855DERIVEDLala M, Li TR, de Alwis DP, Sinha V, Mayawala K, Yamamoto N, Siu LL, Chartash E, Aboshady H, Jain L. A six-weekly dosing schedule for pembrolizumab in patients with cancer based on evaluation using modelling and simulation. Eur J Cancer. 2020 May;131:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.016. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
PMID: 32305010DERIVEDvan Vugt MJH, Stone JA, De Greef RHJMM, Snyder ES, Lipka L, Turner DC, Chain A, Lala M, Li M, Robey SH, Kondic AG, De Alwis D, Mayawala K, Jain L, Freshwater T. Immunogenicity of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced tumors. J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Aug 8;7(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0663-4.
PMID: 31395089DERIVEDRobert C, Ribas A, Schachter J, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, Daud A, Carlino MS, McNeil CM, Lotem M, Larkin JMG, Lorigan P, Neyns B, Blank CU, Petrella TM, Hamid O, Su SC, Krepler C, Ibrahim N, Long GV. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-006): post-hoc 5-year results from an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Sep;20(9):1239-1251. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30388-2. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
PMID: 31345627DERIVEDWang M, Chen C, Jemielita T, Anderson J, Li XN, Hu C, Kang SP, Ibrahim N, Ebbinghaus S. Are tumor size changes predictive of survival for checkpoint blockade based immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma? J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Feb 8;7(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0513-4.
PMID: 30736858DERIVEDHamid O, Robert C, Ribas A, Hodi FS, Walpole E, Daud A, Arance AS, Brown E, Hoeller C, Mortier L, Schachter J, Long J, Ebbinghaus S, Ibrahim N, Butler M. Antitumour activity of pembrolizumab in advanced mucosal melanoma: a post-hoc analysis of KEYNOTE-001, 002, 006. Br J Cancer. 2018 Sep;119(6):670-674. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0207-6. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
PMID: 30202085DERIVEDCarlino MS, Long GV, Schadendorf D, Robert C, Ribas A, Richtig E, Nyakas M, Caglevic C, Tarhini A, Blank C, Hoeller C, Bar-Sela G, Barrow C, Wolter P, Zhou H, Emancipator K, Jensen EH, Ebbinghaus S, Ibrahim N, Daud A. Outcomes by line of therapy and programmed death ligand 1 expression in patients with advanced melanoma treated with pembrolizumab or ipilimumab in KEYNOTE-006: A randomised clinical trial. Eur J Cancer. 2018 Sep;101:236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.034. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
PMID: 30096704DERIVEDPetrella TM, Robert C, Richtig E, Miller WH Jr, Masucci GV, Walpole E, Lebbe C, Steven N, Middleton MR, Hille D, Zhou W, Ibrahim N, Cebon J. Patient-reported outcomes in KEYNOTE-006, a randomised study of pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:115-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.08.032. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
PMID: 28987768DERIVEDRobert C, Schachter J, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, Daud A, Carlino MS, McNeil C, Lotem M, Larkin J, Lorigan P, Neyns B, Blank CU, Hamid O, Mateus C, Shapira-Frommer R, Kosh M, Zhou H, Ibrahim N, Ebbinghaus S, Ribas A; KEYNOTE-006 investigators. Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2521-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503093. Epub 2015 Apr 19.
PMID: 25891173DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
- Organization
- Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Director
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 28, 2013
First Posted
May 31, 2013
Study Start
August 28, 2013
Primary Completion
March 3, 2015
Study Completion
June 3, 2019
Last Updated
June 2, 2020
Results First Posted
January 14, 2016
Record last verified: 2020-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf