Trial to Evaluate Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery in Elderly Colorectal Cancer Patients
Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery in Elderly Colorectal Cancer Patients Who Were 75 Years Old or Over
2 other identifiers
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Elderly patients have poorer preoperative conditions than younger patients. Therefore, minimally invasive surgery should be an effective treatment method for elderly patients. The investigators conducted a randomized trial that compared laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in elderly patients who were 75 years old or over. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the effect of laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients. In our hypothesis of this trial, laparoscopic surgery is superior to conventional open surgery in short-term results, and same outcome in long -term results. Therefore, laparoscopic surgery would be recommended as standard procedure in an elderly colorectal patient.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 colorectal-cancer
Started Aug 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_3 colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 24, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2017
CompletedNovember 26, 2013
November 1, 2013
4 years
May 16, 2013
November 24, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Early complication rate
All complication due to surgical procedure within 30 days after surgery
30 days after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Overall survival
5 years
Recurrence-free survival
3 years
Length of postoperative hospital stay
9 days
Health-related QOL score
1 year after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Open surgery
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional procedure
Laparoscopic surgery
EXPERIMENTALMinimum invasive procedure
Interventions
New minimum invasive technique
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age of 75 years old or over
- Histologically proven adenocarcinoma
- Clinical tumor penetrates visceral peritoneum (T4a), no metastasis (M0) or lower T factor
- Elective operation
- Tolerable surgery under general anesthesia
- No bulky tumor larger than 8cm in diameter
- No history of laparotomy for colorectal resection except appendectomy
- Provided written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Synchronous or metachronous (within 5 years) malignancy in another organ except carcinoma in situ
- Multiple colorectal cancer that needs reconstruction two or more times
- Acute intestinal obstruction or perforation due to colorectal cancer
- Lower rectal cancer that required pelvic side wall lymphadenectomy
- Pregnant or lactating women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Yokohama City University Medical Center
Yokohama, Kanagawa, 232-0024, Japan
Related Publications (1)
Ishibe A, Ota M, Fujii S, Suwa Y, Suzuki S, Suwa H, Momiyama M, Watanabe J, Watanabe K, Taguri M, Kunisaki C, Endo I. Midterm follow-up of a randomized trial of open surgery versus laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3890-3897. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5418-z. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
PMID: 28205033DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Chikara Kunisaki, Professor
Yokohama City University, Gastroenterological Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2013
First Posted
May 24, 2013
Study Start
August 1, 2008
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
August 1, 2017
Last Updated
November 26, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-11