Comparison of Two Types of Surgery in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer
Randomized Trial of Wide Mesorectal Excision Versus Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid Rectal Cancer
3 other identifiers
interventional
800
2 countries
3
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Surgery to remove the tumor may be an effective treatment for rectal cancer. It is not yet known whether one type of surgery is more effective than another for rectal cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of two types of surgery in treating patients who have rectal cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 colorectal-cancer
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 1999
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 6, 2001
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2003
CompletedAugust 26, 2013
December 1, 2006
January 6, 2001
August 23, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Local recurrence at 3 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Disease-free and overall survival at 5 years
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital
Hong Kong, China
Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital
Hong Kong, China
National Cancer Centre - Singapore
Singapore, 169608, Singapore
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Heah Sieu Min, MD
National Cancer Centre, Singapore