Short-term Effects of LASI Surgery Versus Conventional Laparotomy for Colorectal Liver Metastasis
Short-term Effects of Laparoscopic-assisted Small-incision Surgery Versus Conventional Laparotomy in Treatment of Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastasis
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Surgical resection is still recommended as the optional treatment for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) patients. There are two main concerns for resectable colorectal liver metastasis which remain controversial: surgical time and surgical type. As for the former, synchronous resection of primary colorectal tumor and liver metastasis, with the reason of fare overall survival rate and absence of a second surgery, has gained wide population from gastrointestinal surgeons who believe it will bring benefits to CLM patients. With regard to surgical type, Open liver resection is the optimum choice for CLM patients no matter what the metastasis profile is. And for management of primary tumor, laparoscopic procedure is mature in surgical skill and has been evidenced equivalent overall survival rate compared with open resection. So, primary colorectal tumor resection could be either open or laparoscopic procedure. Therefore, the investigators team conducted the controlled trial to compare two surgical procedures in treatment of resectable colorectal liver metastasis. Patients will be randomly assigned into conventional laparotomy group for simultaneously resection of both primary colorectal tumor and liver metastasis, or laparoscopic-assisted small-incision group for resection of laparoscopic colorectal tumor combined with synchronously small-incision open resection of liver metastasis. The aim of this trial is to observing short-term operative effects after surgeries.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 colorectal-cancer
Started Nov 2013
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2016
CompletedNovember 17, 2015
November 1, 2015
3 years
January 19, 2015
November 15, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
30-day complications
Postoperative 30-day complications including anastomotic leakage, infection, and bile leakage
Postoperative 30 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Pain score
Postoperative 7 days
Hospital time
an expected average of 7 days
C-reactive protein
Postoperative 5 days
Study Arms (2)
Laparoscopic group
EXPERIMENTALLaparoscopic group, laparoscopic surgery or laparoscopic-assisted small-incision for resection of laparoscopic colorectal tumor combined with synchronously small-incision open resection of liver metastasis
Conventional group
NO INTERVENTIONConventional group, conventional laparotomy for simultaneously resection of both primary colorectal tumor and liver metastasis
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pathologically confirmed resectable upper rectal cancer, sigmoid cancer, and left colon cancer
- MRI/CT confirmed resectable liver metastasis after muti-disciplinary team assessment
- No evidence of other metastasis
- Organs function well to tolerance simultaneous surgery, especially liver function
- No special treatment before surgery
- Informed consent was written
You may not qualify if:
- Right colon cancer and transverse colon cancer
- Pregnant or lactating women
- A history of malignant tumor within 5 years
- There was contraindication for operation
- Discovery of metastasis in other organs in the operation
- With mental disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
West China hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610000, China
West China Hospital
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610000, China
Related Publications (8)
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
PMID: 21296855BACKGROUNDSiegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Jul-Aug;61(4):212-36. doi: 10.3322/caac.20121. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
PMID: 21685461BACKGROUNDVan Cutsem E, Nordlinger B, Adam R, Kohne CH, Pozzo C, Poston G, Ychou M, Rougier P; European Colorectal Metastases Treatment Group. Towards a pan-European consensus on the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Cancer. 2006 Sep;42(14):2212-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.012. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
PMID: 16904315BACKGROUNDKemeny N, Huang Y, Cohen AM, Shi W, Conti JA, Brennan MF, Bertino JR, Turnbull AD, Sullivan D, Stockman J, Blumgart LH, Fong Y. Hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 30;341(27):2039-48. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912303412702.
PMID: 10615075BACKGROUNDTomlinson JS, Jarnagin WR, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Kornprat P, Gonen M, Kemeny N, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH, D'Angelica M. Actual 10-year survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases defines cure. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 10;25(29):4575-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.0833.
PMID: 17925551BACKGROUNDLi ZQ, Liu K, Duan JC, Li Z, Su CQ, Yang JH. Meta-analysis of simultaneous versus staged resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases. Hepatol Res. 2013 Jan;43(1):72-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2012.01050.x. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
PMID: 22971038BACKGROUNDWei M, He Y, Wang J, Chen N, Zhou Z, Wang Z. Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy with or without synchronous colectomy for colorectal liver metastasis: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e87461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087461. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24489916BACKGROUNDArezzo A, Passera R, Scozzari G, Verra M, Morino M. Laparoscopy for rectal cancer reduces short-term mortality and morbidity: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1485-502. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2649-x. Epub 2012 Nov 25.
PMID: 23183871BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ziqiang Wang, MD,PhD
West China Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of the West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2015
First Posted
January 29, 2015
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
November 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 17, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11