Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
IGNITE1
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
1 other identifier
interventional
541
13 countries
69
Brief Summary
This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, prospective study to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared with ertapenem in the treatment of adult complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Aug 2013
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
69 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 21, 2016
CompletedJanuary 11, 2022
December 1, 2021
1 year
April 29, 2013
January 26, 2016
December 21, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms at the Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-treat (Micro-ITT) Population
Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection \[cIAI\], unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures, persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (outcome was neither cure nor failure, or assessment was not available). Participants who were failures at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) visit (within 24 hours of last dose) were considered failures at the TOC visit. The number of participants with a clinical response classification of cure, failure, or indeterminate is presented.
TOC visit: 25-31 days after the first dose of study drug
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the TOC Visit
TOC visit: 25-31 days after first dose
Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC Visit
TOC visit: 25-31 days after first dose
Study Arms (2)
Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12h
EXPERIMENTALEravacycline was administered intravenously (IV) at a dose of 1.0 milligram per kilogram of body weight (mg/kg) every 12 hours (q12h) for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. Eravacycline treatment was to be stopped when symptoms of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) resolved, there was treatment failure, or the maximum allowed number of infusion days was reached.
Ertapenem, 1.0 g q24h
ACTIVE COMPARATORErtapenem was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 gram (g) every 24 hours (q24h) for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. Ertapenem treatment was to be stopped when symptoms of cIAI resolved, there was treatment failure, or the maximum allowed number of infusion days was reached.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female participant hospitalized for cIAI
- At least 18 years of age (and not over 65 years of age for participant in India)
- Evidence of a systemic inflammatory response
- Abdominal pain or flank pain (with or without rebound tenderness), or pain caused by cIAI that is referred to another anatomic area
- Able to provide informed consent
- If male: must agree to use an effective barrier method of contraception during the study and for 90 days following the last dose if sexually active with a female of childbearing potential
- If female, not pregnant or nursing or, if of childbearing potential: either will commit to use at least two medically accepted, effective methods of birth control (for example, condom, oral contraceptive, indwelling intrauterine device, hormonal implant /patch, injections, approved cervical ring) during study drug dosing and for 90 days following last study drug dose or practicing sexual abstinence
You may not qualify if:
- Unlikely to survive the 6-8 week study period
- Renal failure
- Presence or possible signs of hepatic disease
- Immunocompromised condition, including known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity (requiring anti-retroviral therapy or with CD4 count \<300), acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), organ (bone marrow) transplant recipients, and hematological malignancy. Immunosuppressive therapy, including use of high-dose corticosteroids (for example, \>40 mg prednisone or equivalent per day for greater than 2 weeks)
- History of hypersensitivity reactions to tetracyclines, carbapenems, β-lactam antibiotics or to excipients contained in the study drug formulations
- Participation in any investigational drug or device study within 30 days prior to study entry
- Known or suspected current Central Nervous System disorder that may predispose to seizures or lower seizure threshold
- Previously received eravacycline in a clinical trial
- Receipt of effective antibacterial drug therapy for cIAI for a continuous duration of \>24 hours during the 72-hour preceding enrollment (however, participants with documented cIAI \[that is, known baseline pathogen\] who have received at least 72 hours of antibiotic therapy and are considered treatment failures may be enrolled. Treatment failure is defined as persistent fever and/or clinical symptoms; or the development of a new intra-abdominal abscess after ≥72 hours of antibiotic therapy), or
- Receipt of ertapenem or any other carbapenem, or tigecycline for the current infection or
- Need for concomitant systemic antimicrobial agents other than study drug
- Refusal of mechanical ventilation, dialysis or hemofiltration, cardioversion or any other resuscitative measures and drug/fluid therapy at time of consent
- Known or suspected inflammatory bowel disease or associated visceral abscess
- The anticipated need for systemic antibiotics for a duration of more than 14 days
- Systemic malignancy that required chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation therapy or antineoplastic therapy within the previous 3 months or that is anticipated to begin prior to the Test-of-Cure (TOC) visit
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (69)
Unknown Facility
Florence, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Glendale, California, United States
Unknown Facility
La Mesa, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Torrance, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Aurora, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Carmel, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Unknown Facility
Camden, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Teaneck, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Weston, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Seattle, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Córdoba, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Pleven, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Rousse, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Sofia, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Varna, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Brno, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Kladno, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Mělník, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Olomouc, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Prague, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Ústí nad Labem, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Kohtla-Järve, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Tallinn, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Tartu, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Paris, France
Unknown Facility
Heidelberg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Lübeck, Germany
Unknown Facility
Magdeburg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Daugavpils, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Liepāja, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Riga, Latvia
Unknown Facility
Kaunas, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Klaipėda, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Šiauliai, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Vilnius, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Bucharest, Romania
Unknown Facility
Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Unknown Facility
Craiova, Romania
Unknown Facility
Timișoara, Romania
Unknown Facility
Kaluga, Russia
Unknown Facility
Kemerovo, Russia
Unknown Facility
Moscow, Russia
Unknown Facility
Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
Unknown Facility
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Unknown Facility
Smolensk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Tomsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Volgograd, Russia
Unknown Facility
Vsevolozhsk, Russia
Unknown Facility
Benoni, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Johannesburg, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Pretoria, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Worcester, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kharkiv, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Kyiv, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Odesa, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Uzhhorod, Ukraine
Unknown Facility
Zaporizhia, Ukraine
Related Publications (3)
Solomkin JS, Sway A, Lawrence K, Olesky M, Izmailyan S, Tsai L. Eravacycline: a new treatment option for complicated intra-abdominal infections in the age of multidrug resistance. Future Microbiol. 2019 Oct;14:1293-1308. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2019-0135. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
PMID: 31570004DERIVEDSolomkin JS, Gardovskis J, Lawrence K, Montravers P, Sway A, Evans D, Tsai L. IGNITE4: Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Prospective Trial of Eravacycline vs Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intraabdominal Infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Aug 30;69(6):921-929. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy1029.
PMID: 30561562DERIVEDSolomkin J, Evans D, Slepavicius A, Lee P, Marsh A, Tsai L, Sutcliffe JA, Horn P. Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline vs Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections in the Investigating Gram-Negative Infections Treated With Eravacycline (IGNITE 1) Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):224-232. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4237.
PMID: 27851857DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Chief Development Officer
- Organization
- La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Patrick T Horn, MD, PhD
Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2013
First Posted
May 1, 2013
Study Start
August 1, 2013
Primary Completion
August 1, 2014
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
January 11, 2022
Results First Posted
March 21, 2016
Record last verified: 2021-12