NCT01844856

Brief Summary

This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, prospective study to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared with ertapenem in the treatment of adult complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI).

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
541

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2013

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
13 countries

69 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 29, 2013

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 1, 2013

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2013

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2014

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 21, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

January 11, 2022

Status Verified

December 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

April 29, 2013

Results QC Date

January 26, 2016

Last Update Submit

December 21, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms at the Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-treat (Micro-ITT) Population

    Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection \[cIAI\], unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures, persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (outcome was neither cure nor failure, or assessment was not available). Participants who were failures at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) visit (within 24 hours of last dose) were considered failures at the TOC visit. The number of participants with a clinical response classification of cure, failure, or indeterminate is presented.

    TOC visit: 25-31 days after the first dose of study drug

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the TOC Visit

    TOC visit: 25-31 days after first dose

  • Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC Visit

    TOC visit: 25-31 days after first dose

Study Arms (2)

Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12h

EXPERIMENTAL

Eravacycline was administered intravenously (IV) at a dose of 1.0 milligram per kilogram of body weight (mg/kg) every 12 hours (q12h) for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. Eravacycline treatment was to be stopped when symptoms of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) resolved, there was treatment failure, or the maximum allowed number of infusion days was reached.

Drug: EravacyclineDrug: Placebo

Ertapenem, 1.0 g q24h

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Ertapenem was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 gram (g) every 24 hours (q24h) for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. Ertapenem treatment was to be stopped when symptoms of cIAI resolved, there was treatment failure, or the maximum allowed number of infusion days was reached.

Drug: ErtapenemDrug: Placebo

Interventions

Also known as: TP-434
Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12h
Also known as: Invanz
Ertapenem, 1.0 g q24h

Administered IV to maintain the blind.

Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12hErtapenem, 1.0 g q24h

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female participant hospitalized for cIAI
  • At least 18 years of age (and not over 65 years of age for participant in India)
  • Evidence of a systemic inflammatory response
  • Abdominal pain or flank pain (with or without rebound tenderness), or pain caused by cIAI that is referred to another anatomic area
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • If male: must agree to use an effective barrier method of contraception during the study and for 90 days following the last dose if sexually active with a female of childbearing potential
  • If female, not pregnant or nursing or, if of childbearing potential: either will commit to use at least two medically accepted, effective methods of birth control (for example, condom, oral contraceptive, indwelling intrauterine device, hormonal implant /patch, injections, approved cervical ring) during study drug dosing and for 90 days following last study drug dose or practicing sexual abstinence

You may not qualify if:

  • Unlikely to survive the 6-8 week study period
  • Renal failure
  • Presence or possible signs of hepatic disease
  • Immunocompromised condition, including known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity (requiring anti-retroviral therapy or with CD4 count \<300), acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), organ (bone marrow) transplant recipients, and hematological malignancy. Immunosuppressive therapy, including use of high-dose corticosteroids (for example, \>40 mg prednisone or equivalent per day for greater than 2 weeks)
  • History of hypersensitivity reactions to tetracyclines, carbapenems, β-lactam antibiotics or to excipients contained in the study drug formulations
  • Participation in any investigational drug or device study within 30 days prior to study entry
  • Known or suspected current Central Nervous System disorder that may predispose to seizures or lower seizure threshold
  • Previously received eravacycline in a clinical trial
  • Receipt of effective antibacterial drug therapy for cIAI for a continuous duration of \>24 hours during the 72-hour preceding enrollment (however, participants with documented cIAI \[that is, known baseline pathogen\] who have received at least 72 hours of antibiotic therapy and are considered treatment failures may be enrolled. Treatment failure is defined as persistent fever and/or clinical symptoms; or the development of a new intra-abdominal abscess after ≥72 hours of antibiotic therapy), or
  • Receipt of ertapenem or any other carbapenem, or tigecycline for the current infection or
  • Need for concomitant systemic antimicrobial agents other than study drug
  • Refusal of mechanical ventilation, dialysis or hemofiltration, cardioversion or any other resuscitative measures and drug/fluid therapy at time of consent
  • Known or suspected inflammatory bowel disease or associated visceral abscess
  • The anticipated need for systemic antibiotics for a duration of more than 14 days
  • Systemic malignancy that required chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation therapy or antineoplastic therapy within the previous 3 months or that is anticipated to begin prior to the Test-of-Cure (TOC) visit

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (69)

Unknown Facility

Florence, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Glendale, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

La Mesa, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Los Angeles, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Torrance, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Aurora, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Carmel, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Camden, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Teaneck, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Weston, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Seattle, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Córdoba, Argentina

Location

Unknown Facility

Pleven, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Rousse, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Sofia, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Varna, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Brno, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Kladno, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Mělník, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Olomouc, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Prague, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Ústí nad Labem, Czechia

Location

Unknown Facility

Kohtla-Järve, Estonia

Location

Unknown Facility

Tallinn, Estonia

Location

Unknown Facility

Tartu, Estonia

Location

Unknown Facility

Paris, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Heidelberg, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Lübeck, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Magdeburg, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Daugavpils, Latvia

Location

Unknown Facility

Liepāja, Latvia

Location

Unknown Facility

Riga, Latvia

Location

Unknown Facility

Kaunas, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Klaipėda, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Šiauliai, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Vilnius, Lithuania

Location

Unknown Facility

Bucharest, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Craiova, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Timișoara, Romania

Location

Unknown Facility

Kaluga, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Kemerovo, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Moscow, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Smolensk, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Tomsk, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Volgograd, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Vsevolozhsk, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Benoni, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Johannesburg, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Pretoria, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Worcester, South Africa

Location

Unknown Facility

Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Kharkiv, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Kyiv, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Odesa, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Uzhhorod, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Zaporizhia, Ukraine

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Solomkin JS, Sway A, Lawrence K, Olesky M, Izmailyan S, Tsai L. Eravacycline: a new treatment option for complicated intra-abdominal infections in the age of multidrug resistance. Future Microbiol. 2019 Oct;14:1293-1308. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2019-0135. Epub 2019 Oct 1.

  • Solomkin JS, Gardovskis J, Lawrence K, Montravers P, Sway A, Evans D, Tsai L. IGNITE4: Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Prospective Trial of Eravacycline vs Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intraabdominal Infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Aug 30;69(6):921-929. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy1029.

  • Solomkin J, Evans D, Slepavicius A, Lee P, Marsh A, Tsai L, Sutcliffe JA, Horn P. Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline vs Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections in the Investigating Gram-Negative Infections Treated With Eravacycline (IGNITE 1) Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):224-232. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4237.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

eravacyclineErtapenem

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Carbapenemsbeta-LactamsLactamsAmidesOrganic ChemicalsHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Chief Development Officer
Organization
La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company

Study Officials

  • Patrick T Horn, MD, PhD

    Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2013

First Posted

May 1, 2013

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion

August 1, 2014

Study Completion

August 1, 2014

Last Updated

January 11, 2022

Results First Posted

March 21, 2016

Record last verified: 2021-12

Locations