NCT01805336

Brief Summary

Since many years cognitive disorders are a main topic of clinical research in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) as there could be observed early on in the disease and could induce with time in patients significant socio-professional burden. Today assessment of cognitive dysfunction in MS is still based on traditional pencil-paper task tests which are not able to give a true representation of functional burden observed in patients in real life situations. The development of new tools close to these "life situations", i.e. more ecological, are needed to better assess and take in charge cognitive impairment in MS patients. One way to reach this goal is Virtual Reality (VR). VR offers a new human-computer interface paradigm that simulates a realistic 3D environment where the user become immersed and interacts with it. These last ten years VR has known a rapid development in the health domain and has been applied with success to motor rehabilitation, psychiatry and neuropsychology. In this last domain, virtual environment (VE) reproducing activities of daily living have been used to evaluate executive and memory functions as well as attentional or visuospatial processes. Among main VE developed, driving assessment system, navigation skills, cooking behaviors, virtual supermarket have shown better sensitivity to detect functional consequences of cognitive impairment in various neurological and psychiatric disorders than traditional evaluations. In Caen University Hospital, investigators used VE driving system and developed the use of the Virtual Action Planning in a supermarket (VAP-S ; Klinger et al 2004) where a user move to select and buy groceries and other things inside an interactive virtual supermarket using a shopping cart. In a preliminary study investigators have used this virtual interactive tool to evaluate executive functioning in small group of Parkinson's disease and MS patients. Analysis of initial data shows the feasibility of the VAP-S for use with these two kinds of diseases. According to these results investigators planned a new study in Relapsing-Remitting(RR)- MS patients where they compare the use of VE (driving system and the VAP-S) to traditional attentional and executive evaluation for estimate their respective sensitivity to detect cognitive/functional impairment in MS patients. Investigators hope to shown that VR will demonstrate its interest to assess cognitive functions in MS and to develop cognitive rehabilitation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 26, 2013

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 6, 2013

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 28, 2013

Completed
7.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 9, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 9, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

February 17, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

7.3 years

First QC Date

February 26, 2013

Last Update Submit

February 13, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Relapsing-Remitting MScognitive impairmentvirtual reality

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Scores for traditional tests

    For each test, scores will be compared between patients and healthy subjects.

    2 visits over 1 week

  • Scores for virtual reality tests

    For each test, scores will be compared between patients and healthy subjects.

    2 visits over 1 week

  • Correlation between traditional and virtual reality tests

    Links between scores for traditional tests and scores for virtual reality tests will assessed by calculating Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficents, among all participants.

    2 visits over 1 week

  • Z-scores for traditional and virtual reality tests

    For each patient and each score, z-score will be calculated. For traditional and virtual reality tests for which a correlation will be observed, the z-scores will be compared.

    2 visits over 1 week

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Score for cognitive complaint questionnaire

    Inclusion visit

  • Scores for fatigue, anxiety and depression questionnaires

    inclusion visit

Study Arms (2)

Arm A

OTHER

Inclusion : cognitive complaint,fatigue, anxiety an depression questionnaires. Assessment 1 : attentional function by traditional tests + executive function by virtual reality tests. One week later, Assessment 2 : attentional function by virtual reality tests + executive function by traditional tests.

Other: Assessment of attentional functions by traditional testsOther: Assessment of attentional functions by virtual reality testsOther: Assessment of executive functions by traditional testsOther: Assessment of executive functions by virtual reality testOther: Evaluation of cognitive complaint, fatigue, anxiety and depression

Arm B

OTHER

Inclusion : cognitive complaint,fatigue, anxiety an depression questionnaires. Assessment 1 : attentional function by virtual reality tests + executive function by traditional tests. One week later, Assessment 2 : attentional function by traditional tests + executive function by virtual reality tests.

Other: Assessment of attentional functions by traditional testsOther: Assessment of attentional functions by virtual reality testsOther: Assessment of executive functions by traditional testsOther: Assessment of executive functions by virtual reality testOther: Evaluation of cognitive complaint, fatigue, anxiety and depression

Interventions

For assessment of attentional functions, virtual reality tests include : Monotonous task of driving on motorways, Task of city driving with accident scenarios, Monotonous driving task with divided attention test ; all tests realized on a driving simulator.

Arm AArm B

For assessment of executive functions, traditional tests include : Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Task verbal fluencies, Sequence Numbers Letters subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) III, Commissions.

Arm AArm B

For assessment of executive functions, virtual reality test include : VAP-S.

Arm AArm B

The following questionnaires will be completed by the participant at the inclusion visit : cognitive complaint RBN-SEP questionnaire to assess cognitive complaint, EMIF-SEP to assess fatigue, STAI (State Trait Anxiety Inventory) to assess anxiety and MADRS to assess depression.

Arm AArm B

For assessment of attentional functions, traditional tests include : Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Test d'Evaluation de l'Attention (TEA), Attentional Network Test (ANT).

Arm AArm B

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients only :
  • Diagnosis of RR-MS in accordance with the Polman et al. criteria (2011)
  • Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) \< 6
  • Any disease duration
  • Patients and healthy subjects :
  • Men and women
  • Ages 30-60 years inclusive
  • Score of \> 130 on the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (DRS)
  • Score of \< 15 on the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
  • French native language
  • Licensed drivers (\> 2 years)
  • Experienced drivers (\> 5000 km / year)
  • Normal or corrected visual acuity greater than or equal to 6/10
  • Sign informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients only :
  • Any relapse or corticosteroids therapy within 30 days
  • Under guardianship
  • Patients and healthy subjects
  • Other neurological, psychiatric or developmental disease
  • Serious systemic disease
  • Sequelae of brain injury
  • Antidepressants or anxiolytics treatment within 4 weeks
  • Treatment known to interfere with cognition (e.g. psychostimulant) within 3 months
  • Alcohol \> 28 units / week
  • Addiction
  • Cognitive assessment within a year (including all or part of the assessment proposed in this study)
  • Sensory or motor failure incompatible with study tasks

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Department of Neurologie, Caen Hospital University

Caen, Basse-Normandie, 14033, France

Location

Inserm Unit 1075 Comete, Caen Hospital University

Caen, Basse-Normandie, 14033, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Delsanti R, Le Mercier E, Briant A, Derache N, Arnaud C, Branger P, Defer G. Can a virtual reality tool detect minor executive functions impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis? Rev Neurol (Paris). 2025 Sep;181(7):681-690. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2025.06.009. Epub 2025 Jul 23.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingCognitive Dysfunction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Multiple SclerosisDemyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNSAutoimmune Diseases of the Nervous SystemNervous System DiseasesDemyelinating DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System DiseasesCognition DisordersNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Gilles Defer, Professor

    University Hospital, Caen

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2013

First Posted

March 6, 2013

Study Start

March 28, 2013

Primary Completion

July 9, 2020

Study Completion

July 9, 2020

Last Updated

February 17, 2026

Record last verified: 2020-01

Locations