Assessment of Attentional and Executive Disorders in Multiple Sclerosis Using Techniques of Virtual Reality
SEPREV
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Since many years cognitive disorders are a main topic of clinical research in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) as there could be observed early on in the disease and could induce with time in patients significant socio-professional burden. Today assessment of cognitive dysfunction in MS is still based on traditional pencil-paper task tests which are not able to give a true representation of functional burden observed in patients in real life situations. The development of new tools close to these "life situations", i.e. more ecological, are needed to better assess and take in charge cognitive impairment in MS patients. One way to reach this goal is Virtual Reality (VR). VR offers a new human-computer interface paradigm that simulates a realistic 3D environment where the user become immersed and interacts with it. These last ten years VR has known a rapid development in the health domain and has been applied with success to motor rehabilitation, psychiatry and neuropsychology. In this last domain, virtual environment (VE) reproducing activities of daily living have been used to evaluate executive and memory functions as well as attentional or visuospatial processes. Among main VE developed, driving assessment system, navigation skills, cooking behaviors, virtual supermarket have shown better sensitivity to detect functional consequences of cognitive impairment in various neurological and psychiatric disorders than traditional evaluations. In Caen University Hospital, investigators used VE driving system and developed the use of the Virtual Action Planning in a supermarket (VAP-S ; Klinger et al 2004) where a user move to select and buy groceries and other things inside an interactive virtual supermarket using a shopping cart. In a preliminary study investigators have used this virtual interactive tool to evaluate executive functioning in small group of Parkinson's disease and MS patients. Analysis of initial data shows the feasibility of the VAP-S for use with these two kinds of diseases. According to these results investigators planned a new study in Relapsing-Remitting(RR)- MS patients where they compare the use of VE (driving system and the VAP-S) to traditional attentional and executive evaluation for estimate their respective sensitivity to detect cognitive/functional impairment in MS patients. Investigators hope to shown that VR will demonstrate its interest to assess cognitive functions in MS and to develop cognitive rehabilitation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 26, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 28, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 9, 2020
CompletedFebruary 17, 2026
January 1, 2020
7.3 years
February 26, 2013
February 13, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Scores for traditional tests
For each test, scores will be compared between patients and healthy subjects.
2 visits over 1 week
Scores for virtual reality tests
For each test, scores will be compared between patients and healthy subjects.
2 visits over 1 week
Correlation between traditional and virtual reality tests
Links between scores for traditional tests and scores for virtual reality tests will assessed by calculating Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficents, among all participants.
2 visits over 1 week
Z-scores for traditional and virtual reality tests
For each patient and each score, z-score will be calculated. For traditional and virtual reality tests for which a correlation will be observed, the z-scores will be compared.
2 visits over 1 week
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Score for cognitive complaint questionnaire
Inclusion visit
Scores for fatigue, anxiety and depression questionnaires
inclusion visit
Study Arms (2)
Arm A
OTHERInclusion : cognitive complaint,fatigue, anxiety an depression questionnaires. Assessment 1 : attentional function by traditional tests + executive function by virtual reality tests. One week later, Assessment 2 : attentional function by virtual reality tests + executive function by traditional tests.
Arm B
OTHERInclusion : cognitive complaint,fatigue, anxiety an depression questionnaires. Assessment 1 : attentional function by virtual reality tests + executive function by traditional tests. One week later, Assessment 2 : attentional function by traditional tests + executive function by virtual reality tests.
Interventions
For assessment of attentional functions, virtual reality tests include : Monotonous task of driving on motorways, Task of city driving with accident scenarios, Monotonous driving task with divided attention test ; all tests realized on a driving simulator.
For assessment of executive functions, traditional tests include : Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Task verbal fluencies, Sequence Numbers Letters subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) III, Commissions.
For assessment of executive functions, virtual reality test include : VAP-S.
The following questionnaires will be completed by the participant at the inclusion visit : cognitive complaint RBN-SEP questionnaire to assess cognitive complaint, EMIF-SEP to assess fatigue, STAI (State Trait Anxiety Inventory) to assess anxiety and MADRS to assess depression.
For assessment of attentional functions, traditional tests include : Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Test d'Evaluation de l'Attention (TEA), Attentional Network Test (ANT).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients only :
- Diagnosis of RR-MS in accordance with the Polman et al. criteria (2011)
- Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) \< 6
- Any disease duration
- Patients and healthy subjects :
- Men and women
- Ages 30-60 years inclusive
- Score of \> 130 on the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (DRS)
- Score of \< 15 on the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
- French native language
- Licensed drivers (\> 2 years)
- Experienced drivers (\> 5000 km / year)
- Normal or corrected visual acuity greater than or equal to 6/10
- Sign informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients only :
- Any relapse or corticosteroids therapy within 30 days
- Under guardianship
- Patients and healthy subjects
- Other neurological, psychiatric or developmental disease
- Serious systemic disease
- Sequelae of brain injury
- Antidepressants or anxiolytics treatment within 4 weeks
- Treatment known to interfere with cognition (e.g. psychostimulant) within 3 months
- Alcohol \> 28 units / week
- Addiction
- Cognitive assessment within a year (including all or part of the assessment proposed in this study)
- Sensory or motor failure incompatible with study tasks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Department of Neurologie, Caen Hospital University
Caen, Basse-Normandie, 14033, France
Inserm Unit 1075 Comete, Caen Hospital University
Caen, Basse-Normandie, 14033, France
Related Publications (1)
Delsanti R, Le Mercier E, Briant A, Derache N, Arnaud C, Branger P, Defer G. Can a virtual reality tool detect minor executive functions impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis? Rev Neurol (Paris). 2025 Sep;181(7):681-690. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2025.06.009. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
PMID: 40707327RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gilles Defer, Professor
University Hospital, Caen
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2013
First Posted
March 6, 2013
Study Start
March 28, 2013
Primary Completion
July 9, 2020
Study Completion
July 9, 2020
Last Updated
February 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2020-01